Books

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 15° London Hi 15°C / Lo 8°C

Britain 'knows little about Bible'

By Lewis Smith

The public is widely ignorant of the stories and people who provide the basis of Christianity, a survey has found, despite 75 per cent of respondents owning a copy of the Bible.

The National Biblical Literacy Survey found that as few as 10 per cent of people understood the main characters in the Bible and their relevance.

Figures such as Abraham and Joseph were a source of puzzlement and it was rare to find anyone who could name the Ten Commandments.

Many stories considered to be central to the Christian message were a mystery to most. As few as 7 per cent of respondents knew the story of Whitsun and only 15 per cent were familiar with the stories associated with Advent.

St John's College Durham in Durham carried out the survey and released preliminary findings yesterday. The full report is expected to be published in July.

Researchers found that 57 per cent of people knew nothing about Joseph or his brothers despite the hit musical Joseph and the Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat and 60 per cent were ignorant of the story of the Good Samaritan.

The Reverend David Wilkinson, from St John's, said the consequences of ignorance went far beyond being unclear about what church leaders might preach. He said a good grounding in the stories and characters of the Bible was essential to understanding history and culture because so much of art, music and literature was bound up with religious themes.

"There are depths to many pieces of music, many of Shakespeare's plays, particular pieces of art that draw from the imagery, the stories, the language of the Bible," Dr Wilkinson told the BBC.

The Reverend Brian Brown, a Methodist preacher and visiting lecturer at St John's, said he was startled by the lack of knowledge and understanding among people questioned, despite a third of them saying that the Bible was important to them.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

And why should they?
[info]reiksares wrote:
Sunday, 28 June 2009 at 11:33 pm (UTC)
The modern bible is a fraud put together by medieval clerical bigots. They ruthlessly removed the books of the so-called "apocrypha" (their term) because they didn't like the content. Christianity is simply a system of moral blackmail to hold the population in check, to work them into the grave for the profit of the landowners... and tell them that "God" wants all this and their "riches will be in heaven".

Stuff the "bible" and its promoters.
Bible and Mythology
[info]kwenchin wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 01:44 am (UTC)
The bible is as important as Greek and Roman mythology for understanding art and literature.
It's lucky that there are scholars around willing to trawl through this to add footnotes to books.

Bible
[info]willywonka66 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 02:52 am (UTC)
Praise be to the flying spaghetti monster!

The Bible has no relevance to a society that has grown up beyond medieval superstition.
It's impossible to fully understand our cultural heritage without this
[info]sarah_j_bs wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 03:41 am (UTC)
Suspending judgement on the truth / origins / validity of the Bible as a religious document - everyone must be able to agree on the significance of this book as one of the key foundation stones of our culture.

So many of our (Britain, Europe) greatest achievements in music, art, architecture, and literature were grounded in Christian symbolism. To completely reject that heritage out of hand, and to allow ourselves to forget those roots (even if we do not believe in the wider message in the same way) - is to be culturally bereft.

It is difficult to even comprehend art or cultural history pre-1850 without an understanding of the classics and basic theology. Shame if that were to become the exclusive preserve of a few stuffy academics...
Charity
[info]redroseandy wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 04:12 am (UTC)
There are so few Church goers that have ever read the Bible from cover to cover that they do not know the Bible either. How many Christians do you know that understand that they must give all their money to the poor?
Re: Charity
[info]bluesqueak wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 11:25 pm (UTC)
Hopefully very few - because that's not what it says if you read the whole of the Gospels. If you've read the Bible from cover to cover yourself, you should know that.

You seem to be referring to one story, that of the Rich Young Man who was told to give all his money away. He was being asked which he valued more when the chips were down: being rich, or following God. For everyone else, the message throughout was 'if you have two shirts, give one to your brother who has none.' In other words, if you have more than enough, share.

Yes, it's good to know that this message can now be put aside.
Re: Charity
[info]redroseandy wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 04:24 pm (UTC)
The rich man was told to give his money away so that he could be made perfect, that is, receive all the gifts of the Holy Spirit. Saints are thin on the ground because so few Christians do so.
Re: Charity
[info]phillifent_r wrote:
Thursday, 2 July 2009 at 10:31 pm (UTC)
Seemingly this individual does not know that the Holy Bible is divided into two parts - the OldTestament and the New Testament. The first being a garbled history of the Jews and the second the being the basis on which the true religion - CHRISTIANITY- is founded. Hence it is not necessary to read the book from cover to cover. Silly stories such as the plagues on Egypt, walls of Jerico can be dismissed for what they are - total inventions written down hundreds, maybe even thousands of years after they were said to occur! Often to justify political and military adventures!
In the case of the New Testament, this wass written down within a short time after he death iof Jesus Christ(the human form of GOD)/ As Christ himself said: "..those are not with me are against me..! meaning that you either believe in Christ or you don't, there is no "compulsion" element however as there is in some other "later" religions. He also said "no man cometh to the Father but by Me" "By me" ie. by Christianity, showing that all other religions are false. We live in a country whose whole culture, art, history etc. is founded on Christianity. If other countries want to follow the left-hand path of false beliefs then let them, that matters not one jot to me.
Godbotherers and garbled history
[info]forthurst wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 05:20 am (UTC)
Even fewer people know or are interested in knowing such truth as might exist behind this book. For instance, how many people are aware that 'King Solomon' was actually Ramses II?

http://ancientegyptweblog.blogspot.com/2006/03/ramses-ii-was-king-solomon.html

the bible
[info]almostvoid wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 06:09 am (UTC)
it's GOOD to know how sane and relaxed Britain is in letting this book of horrors, infamy, gross delusional aspirations, homicidal hatred, the blood, the gore, the infamy if this convoluted phantasmagoric compendium to be so wonderfully ignored. May the rest of the world be inspired by your healthy indifference.
Ignorance of the bible is a pre-requisite
[info]chuckkw wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 06:53 am (UTC)
I live in Canada and get all the major US TV channels and hear from all their major "preachers".

People in the USA, that allegedly most Christian of nations, also know little about the bible.

If they'd take the time to read whole books of the bible, or even just whole chapters, they'd likely convert to atheism.

As it is, they read verses and take them in isolation.

The bible is largely self-contradictory, meaning you can pick and choose verses to make it say anything.

I say, read Leviticus. It hasn't been stricken from the Christian bible, in fact it is "The Law", the old Jewish law, Jesus implores his followers to follow. Leviticus is short, maybe taking 2 or 3 hours to read.

If it doesn't put you off, you're living in the dark ages.
Ignorance & the Bible
[info]bepositiveman wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 07:42 am (UTC)
It is interesting to note that those who have commented so positively to this item reveal themselves also to be ignorant of the content teaching & history of the Bible. If the contributors have nothing of value to say, why say anything?
So what were you expecting?
[info]mazaluk wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 08:49 am (UTC)
I note that the emphasis was on Christianity, which has increasingly lost its meaning and message in British society over the past 65 years.

Given that Christianity is based on the life and teachings of a Jewish rabbi, its no wonder that so many nominal Christians are confused by what Christianity is all about.

Perhaps it is time to either reafirm the Church of England as the state religion - or abolish it altogether?
Re: So what were you expecting?
[info]theelectrician wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 09:11 am (UTC)
"...Christianity is based on the life and teachings of a Jewish rabbi,..."

I wasn't aware that Jesus was a rabbi. Where does that come from?
That's just not true
[info]humble_sparrow wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 09:15 am (UTC)
Nearly everyone is well versed with the "Argos" and "Littlewoods" bibles

Nearly everyone regularly goes to the Church of consumerism, the big shopping centre and becomes ecstatic with Gods of celebrity.

To imply we live in a spirituality empty age is a nonsense and just not true :-)
Re: That's just not true
[info]skeptici wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 01:08 pm (UTC)
'Nearly everyone is well versed with the "Argos" and "Littlewoods" bibles'

I hate the Argos and Littlewoods bibles - they don't sell slaves.
Re: That's just not true
[info]humble_sparrow wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 09:35 am (UTC)
"I hate the Argos and Littlewoods bibles - they don't sell slaves."

Maybe you are right but they have made slaves of us all and we do it voluntarily
To "The Electrician"
[info]mazaluk wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 09:29 am (UTC)
"Britain Knows Little About the Bible"

'nuff said?
This is encouraging news!
[info]sickofstupidity wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 10:12 am (UTC)
So most people in this country have a poor knowledge of the Bible?

Excellent - this is encouraging news! Hopefully, it is a sign that the proselytizers and brainwashers of the Christian faith, who for centuries have been allowed - and, indeed, encouraged and supported by a Christianized Establishment - to infect each new generation of British citizens with the mind-virus of their silly, dangerous Bronze Age superstitions, are finally conceding ground to the forces of modern scientific rationalism, skeptical atheism and critical free-thinking.

Of course, realistically, I suspect that the widespread ignorance of the Christian scriptures is less the result of a conscious intellectual opposition to religion on most people's part, and more a consequence of a general disinterest in ancient mythologies, due to their - correctly - perceived irrelevance to modern life. Indeed, why should people think that knowledge of the stories and characters of the Bible is any more important and useful to them than knowledge of the stories and characters of Greek, Roman or Norse mythology?

And as for 'Reverend' David Wilkinson lame justification that "a good grounding in the stories and characters of the Bible was essential to understanding history and culture because so much of art, music and literature was bound up with religious themes", this is just another of the - pathetically transparent - excuses that people like him have always used in order to insinuate Christian propaganda into the nation's consciousness. It might ring true if religion were taught in our schools as subject in art, music or literature, or even in cultural studies or ancient history (though many - in fact, most - of the events of the Bible are of highly dubious historicity, of course), but we all know that this is not what its proselytizers have in mind; their real intention is always to brainwash and convert people, by infecting them with, and then subjugating them to, the mind-virus of their faith - because that is what it has programmed them to do.

So let us congratulate the British people on their common sense in rejecting - or simply not caring about - this dangerous, superstitious nonsense. Long may their disinterest and skepticism continue!
Knowledge of the Bible.
[info]superkeith wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 12:39 pm (UTC)
But lack of interest in the Bible was fairly widespread seventy years ago when I was a child so it is nothing new. Part of the problem might be that there have been alterations, additions and mistranslations and the Catholic Church admits to being responsible for this. The Codex Siniaticus, the Oldest complete New Testament,which is housed in the British Museum does not contain the Christmas Story or the Virgin Mary or the massacre of the infants but above all it does not contain the resurrection. This is in common with the Codex Vaticanus and all the original Bibles, which of course were hand written so all these items were added later to conform with the doctrine. There was consternation when the Codex Siniaticus was discovered but the church was so committed to its version of the doctrine that they decided to ignore it and pretend it didn't exist.(See Prof Tischendorf). We know that Genesis is derived from the epic of Gilgamesh and the Enuma Elish(a Mesopotamian creation epic about multiple Gods). There are some 40 creation stories worldwide, many with better credibility than the Abraham versions. I find this very interesting and there is no reason why even Athiests cannot take moral lessons from some of the cautionary tales, just as they might from Aesop but the validity and provenance of all the religious books of all the organised religions are equally open to question and have always been subject to the suppression of evidence coupled with extremist threats.
Re: Knowledge of the Bible.
[info]theologist wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 08:08 am (UTC)
Alas, you are mistaken about Codex Sinaiticus; it contains the virgin birth (or virginal conception as it should more accurately be called) in Luke 1-2 and Matthew 1-2 (yes, those chapters are there) and the resurrection of Jesus in the closing chapters of Matthew, Luke and John (yes, those chapters are there too).
Just plain stupid!
[info]mazaluk wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 12:41 pm (UTC)
"sickofstupidity" lauds the general ignorance of a population devoid of moral and spiritual guidance.

Ignorance is not a cause for celebration, but rather a cause for mourning. The Bible is one of the greatest literary works in existence and lays the basis of behaviour in society and relationships between people and others, people and God and the individual and themself.

"sick of stupidity" exemplefies the disease in society that is rotting away at moral codes and instead leaving us with alcoholics, drug addicts, promiscuity and increasing criminal behaviour.

Christianity is by no means a perfect religion (which religion is) but it does offer moral guidance in an increasingly perplexing world.

Perhaps "sickofstupidity" has something to offer in place of the moral and spiritual guidance of religion? If so, I would like to hear it.
Re: Just plain stupid!
[info]sickofstupidity wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 06:50 pm (UTC)
""sickofstupidity" lauds the general ignorance of a population devoid of moral and spiritual guidance."

Ignorance is not a cause for celebration, but rather a cause for mourning. The Bible is one of the greatest literary works in existence"

Bollocks! The Bible is a hotpotch of mythical fables, folk stories and morality tales, cobbled together from numerous different authors, written,and amended over many years, in different narrative styles, in ludicrously archaic language, and much of it is self-contradictory and inconsistent. Tolkein wrote better mythical fables and folk stories, de Montaigne wrote better philosophy, and Douglas Adams wrote better jokes! In short, the Bible, as a work of 'literature', is, in terms of both content and style, a complete *mess*, and there isn't a single publisher who would touch it with a bargepole today if it landed on their desk as a new manuscript - of fiction, of course!

" and lays the basis of behaviour in society and relationships between people and others, people and God and the individual and themself."

You are speaking as someone who obviously believes in an Invisible Magic Friend called 'God', of course. As someone who does *not* share your delusion, I can dimiss those assertions as the meaningless, delusional nonsense they are.

""sick of stupidity" exemplefies the disease in society that is rotting away at moral codes and instead leaving us with alcoholics, drug addicts, promiscuity and increasing criminal behaviour."

Really? Those are rather sweeping accusations to make about someone's personal morality purely on the basis of their lack of belief in YOUR god! I might say that *you* exemplify the disease of *religious delusion* that is rotting away *people's minds* and *hearts* and leaving us with a bunch of arrogant, self-righteous, preachy, pious, sanctimonious, narrow-minded, ignorant, intolerant, bigoted *idiots* who have been fooled by the mental condition that afflicts them into thinking that they are better than the rest of us, and actually have the right to tell us all how wicked and sinful we are and how we should live more moral lives, when many of these people are some of the most cruel, mean-spirited and frankly *nasty* human beings one can ever be unlucky to meet!

"Christianity is by no means a perfect religion (which religion is) but it does offer moral guidance in an increasingly perplexing world."

Self-righteous, delusional nonsense. Look to your own nature for moral guidance (if you still know where your religious self ends and your own nature begins...), not to the deranged blatherings and ignorant superstitions of desert-dwelling tribesmen from the Bronze Age!

"Perhaps "sickofstupidity" has something to offer in place of the moral and spiritual guidance of religion? If so, I would like to hear it."

I doubt that you would have the patience to listen to it, the intellect to understand it or the humanity to embrace it. I despair of people like you, mazaluk, I really do. By trying to infect the rest of the human race with the same stupidity and ignorance that afflicts them, the religious pose a serious threat to our long-term survival, let alone to our collective sanity! Thankfully, increasing numbers of us are finally waking up to the threat, and taking the battle to them...

Religion is a virus. It will rot your brain and poison your heart. Seek treatment!
Makey-uppy
[info]mazaluk wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 04:21 pm (UTC)
umm...........do you know that Simon Gardner is a figment of his own imagination and only exists in his dreams?

He came from nowhere and will go to nowhere and noone will remember him..........his footprint will disappear. Who was he? What was his life? What was his reason for being born? A mere collection of bones and organs................no soul, so no reason to tread on the earth......................his existance was merely a waste of time............but then, perhaps not?
Re: Makey-uppy
[info]skeptici wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 05:49 pm (UTC)
Quoting Mazaluk: "The Bible is one of the greatest literary works in existence and lays the basis of behaviour in society"

No wonder "society is a mess" when the "bible lays the basis of behaviour in society".

Quoting Mazaluk: "...the disease in society that is rotting away at moral codes and instead leaving us with alcoholics, drug addicts, promiscuity and increasing criminal behaviour."

Do you seriously think society was morally better before Christianity lost its grip on society? What nonsense! Alcoholics, drug addicts, promiscuity and criminal behavior have always existed - regardless the culture and its state endorsed cult(religion). In medieval Christian Europe, entire families lived on alcohol - even the children. Throughout the middle ages, Monks were noted to be the BEST brewers. Nuns were even permitted 6 pints of ale per day; Priests were allowed more - including stronger drinks. Later, there was the 30 year gin problem - during the gin epidemic, the English population of almost 7 million was consuming 18 million gallons of gin per year. All of this when the Churches were full and non-believers were sentenced to hard labor and executed - when non-believers weren't permitted in government.

Of course, some bible verses are against drinking alcohol, some also praise it. Jesus even liked to party - on one occasion, "he even turned water into wine" (because the Off License was shut). The bible even recommends giving alcohol to the depressed - something modern scientific finds wouldn't recommend.

Strangely enough, alcohol and drug abuse in recent years has increased - but let's not forget, drug use and alcohol abuse seem to have increased while our government headed by Christian Tony Blair (who mixed god with politics) was in power - perhaps there is a correlation somewhere?

Did violent crime leading to death exist when Christianity really ruled the roost? Of course it did. Here's what one Parish document from the 17 th century reveals:

# Two Duels, first fot [fought] with frying pan and pitchforks: 1
# Second between a 3 footed stool and a brown jug: 1
# Knocked on the head at Cockfight: 2
# Knocked on ye head with a quart bottle: 1

The reason crime and the other behaviors you mentioned seem more apparent today, is because news is instant and often repeated in the press; long after the event - making it appear that crime is rampant and widespread. Of course, thats not to say that crime hasn't increased - because it has. However, that has more to do with an increase in population, need, overcrowding and immigration [not that all immigrants bring crime with them]. More people=more potential crime - it's that simple.

On the other hand, it could be because our country has had a God fearing government other the last few decades - headed by God fearing Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. Hmmm... maybe there is a correlation between Christian led governments and increase of crime and alcohol/substance abuse?

Still, it's only a minority of people who commit crime [mostly those who believe in some sort of supernatural deity - according to prison stats]. Considering the UK has a population of over 60 million, most of us are good decent people - regardless our beliefs or lack of.

On a personal note: this atheist doesn't drink alcohol or take drugs [unless prescribed by a doctor]. I've also never been in trouble with the law. So mazaluk, I'd be grateful if people like yourself would stop spouting BS and ignorant propaganda. Thank you.



"Prisons are dangerous places - they are brimming with "sinners". Churches are brimming with "sinners" - they must also be dangerous places. I prefer to stay away from both. Don't you?" - Skeptici
THE BIBLE
[info]terry_hamblin wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 10:48 pm (UTC)
Actually, I have read the Bible all the way through several times and I think I understand most of it. It actually pre-dates medieval times, and most of those commenting on it are talking through their hats. It certainly confirms what the article says, that most people are totally ignorant of the Bible, which is why we live in such an awful society.
Which Bible?
[info]lasvegasrich wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 11:37 pm (UTC)
People should realize that the New Testament was written in Greek, a language not spoken by Jesus Christ. According to the History Channel here, there was editing of the gospels over the next few centuries. You then had many translations which would have changed the intent of the original writers. Plus different Christian religions have their own versions. Quoting from the Bible is a fool's game.
good
[info]butterflyfishhm wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 12:18 am (UTC)
Was this survey taken all across the UK, just in England itself, or what? I need to know where the sane people are in case the right-wing theocracy ever takes hold, and I have to escape the US.
Refined reading
[info]mazaluk wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 07:48 am (UTC)
Perhaps if the angry Bible-haters adhered to the laws of Leviticus, the world could be a better place to live in.
Biblical Literacy
[info]pmphillips wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 07:20 am (UTC)
Lots of words written about a rather small article. I am glad that people are engaging with the Bible - even those who reject it out of hand. Lots of the criticism seems a little narrow-minded. I don't mind people saying the bible is irrelevant but all this junk about medievalism and Jesus not speaking Greek and the Church manipulating the story and rejecting apocryphal gospels is a kind of popular re-hash of bad scholarship. Perhaps it would be best to discuss the situation rationally?
We have to go beyond calling one another delusional or assertions that our religion (Christianity or Secularism/Humanism/Atheism) is the bees-knees. There is no proof either way and all the anecdotal evidence I can give can then be rejected by the anecdotes you bring. What's the point of trading insults rather than accepting that both sides are speaking from conviction and understanding and seeking to persuade one another on a more rational basis?
Re: Biblical Literacy
[info]jwwood09 wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 08:40 am (UTC)
Atheism is a belief, even if you are stating what you do not believe in, for example God. Nice one Pmphillips.
Re: Biblical Literacy
[info]hanery wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 12:04 pm (UTC)
Humanists and atheists have a worldview, just as religion does. Its not a unified or homogeneous worldview sure- just as no there is no such thing as the one 'Christian' or 'Islamic' view. It does have presuppositions and a framework to interpret the world. One need only read the works of prominent atheist philosophers to see how atheistic philosophy differs from a religious one; i.e. why are we here, how we should live etc....

It is a belief system, and does bring significant implications for how you view the world- actually almost everything. It not just like not collecting stamps. Whether or not I collect stamps has no effect or contingency on any part of my life of worldview. This is why Humanism is now included in RMPS (Philosophical, Moral and Religious Studies) in schools, and why atheists and Humanists pushed for it to be recognized as such. One group of atheists in America is trying to set up an online correspondance course on atheist thought and how it relates to philosophy, art, literature (etc).
Re: Biblical Literacy
[info]simon_gardner wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 02:07 pm (UTC)
Now you are changing tack completely. Frankly, the term ?belief system? has become so degraded that it is virtually meaningless and can mean pretty much anything and nothing - as you amply demonstrate.

But disbelief, however, is quite simple. As is ?belief?. Disbelief is not any kind of a belief. It never has been and it never will be.

Atheist bus ? Canadian Atheist bus ? Atheist buses in Barcelona, Madrid & Malaga ? Bus Kampagne, Germany ? Bus humaniste (français), Québec, Canada ? Campagna Bus, Italy ? Dutch Atheist billboard campaign ? Finland Atheist bus ? Seattle atheist bus, USA ? Washington DC atheist bus, USA ? Atheist trains Ireland ? Atheist trams in Zagreb, Croatia banned ? Atheist Bus Madison, Wisconsin, USA ? Indiana Atheist Bus, USA ? Chicago Atheist Bus, USA ? Atheist Bus Austria stopped ? New York City Atheist bus
Re: Biblical Literacy
[info]sickofstupidity wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 12:14 pm (UTC)
Atheism is no more a 'belief' than baldness is a hairstyle.
Worldviews
[info]pmphillips wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 11:27 pm (UTC)
Of course the way the article is written, you'd think all this talk of Bible ignorance was valid. So what stories did over three quarters of respondents remember? Stories about Jesus - especially his death and resurrection. They remembered miracles and stories of how God took people scorned by the world and gave them dignity. Of people driven to the edge but who knew they were still loved.
You know, as contributors to this blog have shown, it's easy to deride the Bible and those of us who spend our lives studying it and its influence and coming to quite different conclusions to the Dan Brownesque stuff peddled on this blog commentary.. But in the end such derision takes us nowhere. Nihilism in the end leads to nothing, to obliteration, to dis-everything. I think humanity deserves better.
Re: Worldviews
[info]manaan89 wrote:
Saturday, 4 July 2009 at 10:20 pm (UTC)
The true bible is hidden in the vatican where no one can see it and is in hebrew, yet no acknowledged christian scholor is learned in hebrew and the translated versions of the bible have been fabricated, i don't blame the bible, but rather those who alter it and therefore make people neglect it

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date