How dirty tricks dossier forced Oxford's female poetry professor to quit
REX
Ruth Padel denies being involved in a smear campaign against Derek Walcott, but says she is resigning to do 'what is best for the university'
Ruth Padel resigned from her position as the chair of poetry at Oxford University last night following growing accusations that she had become involved in a smear campaign against one of her opponents for the prestigious position.
Padel was elected the first female Oxford professor of poetry earlier this month after her rival, Derek Walcott, withdrew from the race after a dossier detailing sexual harassment claims that were made against him in the early 1990s was sent anonymously to more than 200 Oxford academics.
Walcott, 78, who was born in St Lucia, accused his critics of engaging in "character assassination", whilst his supporters alleged that a dirty tricks campaign had been waged to make sure he was not elected to the post.
Initially Padel distanced herself from the smear campaign and claimed she had "nothing to do with any behind-doors operations". But it later emerged that she had alerted at least two journalists to the accusations against Walcott before the elections took place.
A number of academics, including some of her supporters, subsequently called on her to resign saying the election process for the post – which remains the most important academic poetry position in the country – had been brought into disrepute.
It is thought to be the first time anyone has resigned from the position since it was first introduced more than 300 years ago. In a statement released last night, Padel said she would no longer take up the post, in order to protect Oxford University's reputation.
"I wish to do what is best for the university and I understand that opinion there is divided," she said. "I therefore resign from the chair of poetry. I hope wounds will now heal and I wish the next professor all the best."
Padel is due to make a longer statement on her reasons for quitting today at the Hay Festival. But last night she maintained that she did not mean for Walcott to withdraw from the running and denied being involved in the anonymous smear campaign. "I genuinely believe I did nothing intentional that led to Derek Walcott's withdrawal from the election," she said. "I wish he had not pulled out. I did not engage in a smear campaign against him, but, as a result of student concern, I naively – and with hindsight unwisely – passed on to two journalists, whom I believed to be covering the whole election responsibly, information that was already in the public domain."
When the frontrunners for the position were announced earlier this year, there was excitement amongst Oxford's literary elite that the chair of poetry would go to either a woman or non-white poet for the first time. The frontrunners were thought to be Padel, Walcott and Arvind Krishna Mehrotra – a respected Indian poet. It appeared almost certain that whoever won would be a radical departure from their overwhelmingly white, male predecessors.
Priyamvada Gopal, professor of post-colonial studies at Cambridge, said: "What disappoints me is that there was a genuine point to be made about opening these sorts of traditional posts up to a wider demographic but now that debate has been mired. It has also trivialised the issue of sexual harassment at academic institutions."
Those who had called on Padel to resign welcomed her decision last night. "It was the right thing to do," said A C Grayling, professor of philosophy at Birkbeck College. "Right from the beginning it was clear that there was a concerted effort to make sure that the election contest concentrated on the character of Derek Walcott rather than his ability as a poet. It was nothing short of a smear campaign."
Padel's resignation now throws the appointment of a new chair of poetry into uncharted territory. A spokesman for Oxford University said: "We respect the decision that Ruth Padel has taken. This has been a difficult chapter for all concerned and a period of reflection may now be in order."
Insiders say there will not be a rush to pick a new candidate, despite the fact that the current chair, Christopher Ricks, is meant to be leaving in October. "There will be a period of waiting for the dust to settle," one source said. Oxford will now have to restart the election process but no timetable has been laid out.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
The allegations made in the article are unsubstantiated, one also involves a substantial financial claim related to the production of a play while the other involves a single, anonymous student.
Sadie Gray wrote about the topic yesterday but managed to avoid mentioning the column by John Walsh, a rather curious omission give the key role played by her colleague in the withdrawal of Derek Walcott from the contest.
Did Ruth Padel provide the information about the allegations of sexual harassment to John Walsh? Why was he allowed to repeat such ancient allegations supported only by his claims about a report in The HArdvard Crimson.
Given the poor journalism during the development of the current economic crisis and the political crisis in the UK, how fascinating to see that the low standards and dubious writings with clear ulterior motives can also be found amongst journalists covering the arts!
Will John Walsh provide a complete and honest account of his actions? CAn Sadie Gray and now Jerome Taylor write about this topic without mentioning the role played by John Walsh?
The university should now do what it can to persuade Derek Walcott to run again.
At the end of the day, the chair should go to the best poet. I hope that the Oxford literary elite care enough about their subject to ensure that it does.
Oxford prides itself with tradition but continuing sexual harassment in academic instutions, red brick ones in particular, is one tradition that should be stamped out!
The only question that should have been relevant, and should be relevant is: Who is the best poet?
To me, the answer is resounding.
I'm finding it hard to understand how one can claim belief of one's own intentions without also accepting that one is totally schizophrenic. One doesn't have belief regarding one's intentions, one has intentions.
Double talk is usually a reliable indicator of madness or lies.
in a trench coat and knee deep in fog
tells the bastard's story of sex and students
and walks away writing
poems about nearly extinct cats
imprinted on her silk scarves
all for her , for her
all the cats for her!
Ha ha ha!
she cries as she folds
into the wet
I've won after all
maybe I should turn blonde
and straighten my nose?
Everyone's watching now
time to work on those abs
All the dark boys and girls will attend
all the glam rock Ezra Pound Fascists
will attest to the glory of the
world of poesy
under her winged blessings!
It's like winning the cheerleading contest or
who can eat the most hotdogs!
And there she is
sweet as a poem about
whatever it is one writes poems about
when one cannot write poems about
what one should really write poems about.
Don't worry, she'll survive
and the myths and stories will be told about her
until tomorrow comes!
Tra la!
Maybe the biggest bar to being an Oxford Professor should be an intemperate willingness to shoot your mouth off on any subject without considering whether, when in print, your words will convey a positive impression of the academic staff at the Univesity.
Join the Facebook group to urge his immediate election...
the decency line allegedly did straddle
through revealing erections
she prejudiced selections
not knowing her career she would addle
The Independent cannot allow itself to be used by a journalist to further the ends of a friend to secure a position, especially not if it involves a smear campaign. By their silence on his involvement while purporting to report on the story Sadie Gray and Jerome Taylor are also involving themselves in the smear campaign.
Other newspapers such as the London Evening Standard have run stories on his role, why the deafening silence from The Independent?
I'm all for truth coming out, but in an ethical manner. She could have addressed her concerns directly to the election committee, but didn't, probably because they would have been swept since the allegations are decades old and Walcott was already "punished" at the time. Therefore, it should have no bearing on his eligibility today.
Instead, she chose to secretly alert journalists then lie about it when confronted initially. Eventually, she says "passed on" student concerns to the press. I'm sure no students expressed any concerns to her and this was just another lie to cover her motives.
She is a f**king disgrace to professional women everywhere.
Your wellies mired in excrement
You underhandedly dug out
To see the opposition leave
Both devious in temperament
And open in discouragement
You saw your chance and swiftly went
Adept at teaching to decieve
To tell the press - to use your clout
Now here's your pay - admonishment
So paddle off then Ruthie dear
Serves her right. If you can't get there on talent, don't resort to grubby tactics as it will come back to bite you.
Maybe it was a fanatical obsession with gender equality that motivated the smear campaign.