Review: 'Demons: our changing attitudes to alcohol, tobacco and drugs', By Virginia Berridge (Oxford University Press, £16.99)
A table published in the Lancet in 2007 ranked substances for harmfulness, and it made headlines when it placed alcohol ahead of crack cocaine and ketamine (“Special K”, to those who enjoy administering a horse tranquiliser on themselves). Tobacco was judged to be worse than cannabis, glue and solvents, LSD and ecstasy. Bar-room philosophers all over the land almost spilled their pints at the notion that they were hard-drug users.
It was, perhaps, meant to be provocative in that unworldly way scientists sometimes like to affect. They did not stray all that far away from public opinion, however: the most harmful drug by some margin was said to be heroin, followed by cocaine, and the least bad, amyl nitrate and khat, then just emerging as a feature among the Somali community. Had the table been produced a couple of centuries before, heroin’s opiate predecessors would not even have been eligible for inclusion: alcohol, specifically gin, would have topped the charts.
Virginia Berridge’s book is an entertaining – I hesitate to use the term addictive – account of our changing attitudes towards, and use of, all manner of substances, with a focus on the most durable pair, tobacco and alcohol. Her account reminds us of how what is now illicit used to be commonplace. Thus, William Wilberforce is revealed as an opium addict, one of many at the time who apparently functioned well into old age. He had a lot to choose from. As with the myriad legal highs today, numerous opium preparations were available, from pills, lozenges, tincture (the romantically named laudanum) through to – goodness me – opium enemas.
The question that is always asked, of course, is why alcohol and tobacco survived, albeit heavily taxed and regulated, while other drugs became demonised. Much of it seems to be fashion and culture. Snuff and pipe-smoking have long been out of fashion, while tobacco is ghettoised. “Rave” drugs and “legal highs” emerged to replace the treats of the hippie generation. Opium became associated with “low life” by about 1900, and infected with fear of “otherness” due to its popularity among Chinese seafarers in the east end of London.
The most rational drug choice today, as per Lancet’s list, would probably be khat: organic, relatively harmless, with no links to organised crime or street violence. But how many of us want to sit around chewing leaves? Then again, not so long ago it was quite usual to see ashtrays in offices and smokers in restaurants. Maybe in 20 years they’ll passing round the khat at fashionable dinner parties or raves.
After giving gay film R-rating despite no sex or violencefilm
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Mother fed her daughter tapeworms to make her skinny for beauty pageant
- 2 Richard Dawkins on babies with Down Syndrome: 'Abort it and try again – it would be immoral to bring it into the world'
- 3 Crystal Palace next manager latest: Palace consider Ally McCoist - EXCLUSIVE
- 4 ALS ice bucket challenge co-founder Corey Griffin drowns, aged 27
- 5 Tim Sherwood column: 'It started as a three-horse race but turned into the Grand National'
Jeremy Clarkson 'sees no problem' with his racist language on Top Gear, says BBC
Lucy, film review: Scarlett Johansson will blow your mind in Luc Besson's complex thriller
Emmys look set to overhaul the Oscars as Hollywood’s prize draw
Miley Cyrus concert banned on morality grounds in the Dominican Republic
Celebrity Big Brother 2014 line-up: Meet the contestants from Lauren Goodger to Kellie Maloney and Audley Harrison
Richard Dawkins on babies with Down Syndrome: 'Abort it and try again – it would be immoral to bring it into the world'
Scottish independence: English people overwhelmingly want Scotland to stay in the UK
Isis threat: Cameron wants an alliance with Iran
Michael Brown shooting: Chaos erupts on the streets of Ferguson after autopsy shows teenager was shot six times – twice in the head
Bin bag full of cats' heads discovered near Manchester's Curry Mile
Disgusting, frustrating, but intriguing: how the country really feels about its politicians