The New Cold War, By Edward Lucas
Why the West must wake up to the threat posed by Putin and the Kremlin
Thursday 07 February 2008
Edward Lucas intends to issue a wake-up call. His book's urgency is fulled by the belief that, while the Russian bear has been sharpening its claws, the West has slept. Our first mistake, he argues, is ever to have regarded Russia as "normal". Our second has been to take our eyes off the ball, so obsessed with the "war on terror" that we have failed to understand the implications of Kremlin policy and pronouncements, as personified by Vladimir Putin.
Taken together, the elements Lucas identifies as comprising the Kremlin's menace to Russia provide strong evidence for his case. They include the curbs on free speech and fair elections, and possible involvement in the murders of Anna Politkovskaya and Alexander Litvinenko. Most worrying is the reintroduction of enforced psychiatric treatment of dissidents. If most people support Putin, so goes the argument, those who disagree must need their heads examining.
If the "old" Cold War involved the threat of nuclear annihilation, the "new" one is centred on energy. Europe is already dependent, to a greater or lesser extent, on imported gas from Russian pipelines. The future problem may not only be a hostile disruption to supplies, but also that Russia is likely to need to keep more gas production for itself.
The Kremlin is impatient. Lucas convincingly argues that a version of Soviet history is being peddled that glorifies the Soviet Union, rubbishes the Yeltsin years and denigrates the West. In a new teachers' manual, Stalin is presented as a great leader who had to take a few harsh decisions. The book comes with Putin's blessing – unsurprisingly, given its assessment of recent years, when "practically every significant deed" is connected with him.
Putin's popularity at home demonstrates that the majority of Russians do not necessarily share some of the values that we take for granted. A fundamental difference in attitude has been highlighted by the Litvinenko affair, with the implication that the old adage still stands: "You can't make an omelette without breaking eggs." During the 1990s, the few who knew how to take advantage of a collapsing economic system transformed themselves into super-rich oligarchs, while average workers saw the roubles in their pocket crumble to dust.
Is it any wonder if the stability that Putin has brought is now valued so highly, and if the freedom to spend and travel matters more than the freedom to dissent?
Bloomsbury, £18.99. Order for £17.09 (free p&p) on 0870 079 8897
BBC Trust agrees to axe channel from TV in favour of digital moveTV
Final Top Gear reviewTV
FestivalsFive ways to avoid the portable toilets
Jurassic WorldThe results are completely brilliant
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Tunisia hotel attack: Locals form 'human shield' to protect hotel from gunman Seifeddine Rezgui
- 2 Greece crisis: Alexis Tsipras accepts troika bailout proposals with conditions
- 3 German ethics council calls for incest between siblings to be legalised by Government
- 4 French woman dies in freak bungee jumping accident
- 5 Facebook rainbow profile pictures likely being tracked by social network
The Rolling Stones announce biggest ever touring rock exhibition with Saatchi Gallery
Glastonbury 2015: The best bits you missed from Lionel Richie and the Dalai Lama to The Libertines' secret set
Glastonbury 2015: The picture of a man crowd surfing in a wheelchair is brilliant, but it wasn't taken at Glastonbury
Fifty Shades of Grey author EL James' Twitter Q&A didn't exactly go as planned
Guillaume Tell gang-rape scene causes uproar at the Royal Opera House
The moment a Queen's Guard soldier lost it and drew his gun at annoying tourist
Greece crisis: IMF was pushed around by Angela Merkel and Nicholas Sarkozy – and now it is being humiliated
Greece crisis: The wider lesson is that it’s time to abandon this failed experiment in currencies
'I wish the BBC would stop calling it Islamic State' – David Cameron unleashes frustration at broadcaster
Pentagon accuses Russia of 'playing with fire' over nuclear threats towards Nato
They are neither a 'state' nor 'Islamic': Why we shouldn't call them Isis, Isil or IS