A fight at the Opera
Lowry centre fears for its future when Royal Opera House moves north
Digg
del.icio.us
Facebook
Reddit
Google
Stumble Upon
Fark
Newsvine
YahooBuzz
Bebo
Twitter
Independent Minds
The Lowry arts centre trustees are angry at the proposal for a northern base for Royal Opera House productions such as Lohengrin, above
enlarge
It was heralded as the most exciting and costly new arts venture for a generation – the chance to bring world class opera and ballet to audiences far beyond the orbit of Covent Garden. But now, before the curtain has even gone up, the proposed scheme to create a permanent new base for the Royal Opera House (ROH) in Manchester has run into trouble.
Trustees of the Lowry arts centre, the glittering showpiece project which was completed just eight years ago with the help of £116m of public money, have demanded that the ROH plan be scrapped.
The Lowry chief executive Julia Fawcett yesterday wrote to the Culture Secretary Ben Bradshaw warning him that by going ahead with a new home in the city, the ROH would decimate its audiences and cost the centre £1.5m a year in lost ticket sales. Ms Fawcett said independently commissioned research demonstrated that The Lowry faced a 10 per cent shortfall in its total funding due to lost sales – threatening the jobs of the centre's 250 staff.
Under the ROH's plan, championed by the former BBC head of news Tony Hall, now the chief executive at Covent Garden, the organisation would spend £100m of public money refurbishing the Palace Theatre in Manchester to create its new northern home. It would then require up to £15m a year of public subsidy through the Arts Council of England and Manchester City Council to host a maximum of 16 Royal Opera performances and 31 by the Royal Ballet.
"We support the desire to extend the arts on offer in the north-west but we cannot support a proposal which threatens the very viability of The Lowry," said Ms Fawcett. The unprecedented statement followed an anguished meeting of the trustees last week in which the implications of the plan were discussed and the scheme was unanimously rejected.
The chairman of the board of trustees Rod Aldridge said that it would be "bad for Manchester, bad for the arts and bad for the taxpayer". He added: "It would destroy what we have achieved and would put the £116m of public money invested in the Lowry at severe risk."
The trustees want the plan to be radically overhauled with the Palace becoming the permanent home for opera and the Lowry the centre for ballet and dance.
But the ROH said it would press ahead with the proposals expressing "disappointment" at the warnings emanating from Salford which it said did not reflect the state of discussions among the parties. A spokeswoman said: "To deny the current proposal at this stage without those wider discussions taking place is premature, and the Royal Opera House remains convinced that there will be a solution that will bring great benefit, both artistically and economically, to Manchester and the greater north-west region."
While the vision, outlined last autumn, created excitement among opera and ballet audiences in the north of England, there are mounting concerns over the cost of the project as the state of public finances worsened. The replacement of Andy Burnham as Culture Secretary, a strong supporter of the plan and a Greater Manchester MP, with Mr Bradshaw has also changed the political dynamics behind the proposal.
It has led to some wondering privately whether the scheme could be shelved for a generation, just as it was when a similar plan was floated in the 1980s. A report commissioned by the Arts Council of England, which lavished praise on the scale of the ambition and the potential cultural benefits, published in March found that the scheme as it stood was "not yet viable".
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
Even accepting that expense on an already overfunded sector of the arts, why give a London based organization the premier opera venue in the North? Of course, Manchester City Council will love it, because their aim to make Manchester an international city of culture has everything to do with attracting Londoners and nothing to do with serving the interests of Manchester people. Still, it would be nice to see a Manchester company benefit from that investment, rather than serving the colonial interests of the ROH, and the investment interests of city councillors.
shegelu ? The ROH?s presence may attract people from further afield than London, which would be in keeping with Manchester?s rightful promotion as an international city and, like it or not, international cities cater for ?relatively well heeled people?. Furthermore, Opera North started life as an offshoot of the ENO and is now regarded as a successful northern achievement. The same could happen to the ROH in Manchester if it gets full support from all concerned instead of being treated as a coloniser or part of some wicked southern conspiracy. For a country of 60m people, we aren?t exactly awash with opera companies.
Isn?t it time to face up to the fact that the Lowry was built in the wrong place? The region?s premier theatre belongs in the city centre where other businesses such as restaurants and bars can share in the success. London and New York have similar concentrations of theatres ? they bring people in and feed off each other. It?s the Lowry that should have to justify its existence, not the Palace.