Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Prom 52, LSO/Gergiev, Royal Albert Hall, London

Michael Church
Tuesday 25 August 2009 11:37 BST
Comments

How do you musically represent the explosion of an atom bomb?

Last year John Adams showed us in his new opera ‘Dr Atomic’: a succession of shattering brass triads in G sharp minor, with an extra hyper-romantic chord thrown in. Alfred Schnittke’s way, half a century ago, was to bombard his audience with everything in his orchestral armoury - string and trombone glissandi, cluster-chords, roars on percussion, and tremolandi all round. But the ‘Nagasaki’ oratorio which Valery Gergiev and the London Symphony Orchestra brought to the Proms didn't give us Schnittke the mature and playful ‘polystylist’: this was Schnittke the student, and it showed.

He wrote this work as his graduation piece at Moscow Conservatory, and added in poems on Nagasaki by Japanese poets, plus a longer poem by a Russian: it was castigated as ‘Expressionism’ and as ‘forgetting the principles of realism in music’, and it got only one further performance in the rest of his life. He later conceded that it was ‘naïve but sincere’: no question of that in the LSO’s performance, but a successful oratorio requires more than sincerity. Like any young composer searching for his voice, we hear Schnittke trying on several for size: first that of Brahms, then Stravinsky, before settling, alas, for a huge wind contingent and Carl Orff choral effects. And, as in music by Orff, the lumbering vocal lines criss-crossed in the air like winds on a bare mountain. The most moving of the poems was sung by the young Russian mezzo Elena Zhidkova - far more beautifully than this bombastic piece deserved. Why did Gergiev waste so much precious time, money, and talent on its revival?

He redeemed himself in the second half of the programme with a magnificent performance of Shostakovich’s Eighth Symphony. This work too had fallen foul of the Soviet authorities, but the world has long acknowledged it as a masterpiece. Gergiev gave it a poised monumentality from the start, letting the bleakness of the initial theme work its labyrinthine way towards gallows humour in the second movement, and demonic power in the third; from the famous cor anglais solo, to the long stretch of string stillness, to the three cymbal-crashing chords which are the leitmotiv - everything was beautifully sculpted. This was an immensely subtle rendering, leading to a final affirmation of passionate tenderness.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in