Robert De Niro: 'You talkin' to me? Oh, OK, then...'
It's been painful to watch Robert De Niro's decline from Travis Bickle to starring with a cartoon moose. Time to get serious again, the actor tells Kaleem Aftab – starting with his latest film
Friday, 25 July 2008
Getty images
Robert De Niro: "I don't know if it's time to be doing this, and also all the other trade unions will be affected by the strike. With the economy as it is at this time, it doesn't seem like a great idea."
Robert De Niro seems to be taking stock of his career, both on screen and off. The 64-year-old is one of the most feted actors in the history of cinema, but even he seems to have realised that filmgoers are weary of watching the mesmerising star of Raging Bull and Taxi Driver going through the motions in lacklustre comedies.
Now, with his reputation in some danger of being lost, he's decided return to more serious work. A wish to set the record straight might also explain why his turn in Barry Levinson's What Just Happened? seems almost autobiographical.
Trying to maintain a career at the top of an industry as transient as the movies is the theme of What Just Happened?. De Niro plays Ben, a movie producer who, in spite of his reputation as a big hitter, knows that his career is on the slide. (Sound familiar?) His latest production, starring Sean Penn, is destined to flop and his next payday is in doubt because Bruce Willis won't shave his beard. Ben's desperately concerned about how he's going to pay his alimony cheques and maintain his Hollywood lifestyle.
One of the main gripes in this Hollywood satire concerns the power actors have in the film industry. Perhaps surprisingly, it's a concern De Niro shares. "Stars have a lot of power because the ultimate question in Hollywood is, 'Who's in it?'" he says. "The second question is who is directing it, or what team is putting it together – the director/producer combination. If they're very, very famous, their decision about whether they do a film or not will decide if the film will go ahead."
De Niro is certainly one of those actors with the clout to get the green light for a picture, but the New Yorker feels that this power can easily be abused. It's this concern that has led him to announce that he doesn't believe actors should follow through on the strike currently mooted by the Screen Actors Guild.
He says: "I don't know if it's time to be doing this, and also all the other trade unions will be affected by the strike. With the economy as it is at this time, it doesn't seem like a great idea. Issues always come and need to be resolved every few years and if we can't make an agreement today, then we should continue to negotiate and when the matter is settled impose the deal retroactively."
He wishes that actors could be more like directors, a fraternity he joined in 1993 when he made A Bronx Tale. "The Directors Guild of America made an agreement by doing their homework and discussing the issues. Directors, because of their occupation, have to be problem-solvers and so it is no surprise to me that they could agree [without going on strike]."
Given that What Just Happened? takes such a dim view of actors, it's worth pointing out that, if it wasn't for De Niro, the film would probably not have been made. It's based on the memoirs of the producer Art Linson, and De Niro read the book because he's cited in it. He enjoys recounting the episode: "I am taking part in a reading of a script and I bring some friends of mine along. I can't remember exactly what project it is, as it's been a while since I read the book. I got input from some people I brought along as I had a feeling it wasn't right, and so I didn't do the movie. He writes about that, but in a funny way. But I'm the one that said to Art Linson, 'You should write a screenplay about your life.' The characters in the film are based on his experiences."
Perhaps they are – but De Niro's character seems also to draw heavily on his own life, and especially on his relationships. A 12-year marriage to Diahnne Abbott, with whom he had one son, ended in 1988. He has twin boys from his relationship with Toukie Smith. He's now married to Grace Hightower, who bore him another son in 1998; the relationship seemed to be heading to the divorce courts in 2001 before a rapprochement.
In the film, his character is estranged from his current wife, played by Robin Wright Penn; they are seeing a therapist to help them separate. He is also paying alimony to a former wife. De Niro says: "There are characteristics that are very similar. It's not me, but there are many things [that are the same]. If there are things I take from my own life, it's because I feel that they are useful to the character that I'm playing. But I do that with every character I play."
What is becoming clear as De Niro speaks is that this role is, in part, a way to answer his growing band of critics. Born in New York in 1943, the actor who grew up admiring Marlon Brando, Montgomery Clift and James Dean is famed for his method approach to acting. Even when De Niro was regularly being nominated for Oscars, and twice winning, there were accusations that he was exactly like one of these characters he and his new film are lambasting, needing everything to be perfect to perform.
Asked if he's "difficult", De Niro looks incredulous. "Difficult, what do you mean by that? You can have integrity but that doesn't mean you are difficult. There is a difference. I don't like it when any actor – or anybody, it could be someone in the crew – brings their own craziness to the set. When you make a movie, everyone should leave their own personal problems at home. When they start bringing those to set, filming can be very difficult. Anyone who's made a film will tell you how difficult they are. You don't need any extra drama. Put the drama into the story, in the characters."
In the past decade, we haven't seen De Niro put much drama into many characters. He's seemed content to coast in comedies, replacing his mischievous smirk with a gurning mug, living on past glories. When we meet, he's just picked up a lifetime achievement award at the Karlovy Vary Film Festival in the Czech Republic, and one can't help but wonder whether these awards signal an acceptance that he'll never again hit the heights as an actor. De Niro also recently presented a screening of Martin Scorsese's New York, New York; when it came out in 1977 it was one of De Niro's least praised roles, but it's a masterpiece compared to some recent turns.
The decline set in soon after he stopped working with Scorsese in 1995. That was the year of Casino and Michael Mann's Heat. Then came a few middling efforts, the most startling of which was seeing De Niro out-acted by Sylvester V C Stallone in CopLand. But then, in 1999, Analyze This took more than $100m at the US box office and De Niro became convinced he was the king of comedy – and the decade of sending himself up began. This was the period when he made Showtime, The Adventures of Rocky & Bullwinkle and Meet the Parents.
But De Niro argues that being able to laugh at yourself should be viewed as a positive rather than a negative, and uses the appearance of Willis in What Just Happened? as an example: "Bruce was great. He had a really good sense of humour about himself." Then, in a comment that could just as easily have been about himself, he adds: "He could make fun of himself and the idea of who he is and his status as an actor."
The less demanding nature of his work in the past decade has left De Niro free to focus on other projects, such as running the Tribeca Film Festival (New York's rival to Sundance), as well as owning hotels and restaurants. These ventures seemed to excite him more than acting – although again he wonders how he can be criticised for taking time to run a festival that promotes young film-makers and independent film-making. "It brings together people who are really interested in film-making in one place where they can meet and share ideas. It's not just for the general public, although they do come too; it's a place with a heavy concentration of film-makers."
In April, the actor left his longtime agents CAA. Soon, an email began circulating, purportedly from a CAA staffer and saying why the company would not miss De Niro. It claims that the actor is unsatisfied with his current pay-cheques and attributes this to the fact that the star had chosen to send himself up rather than protect the De Niro brand, in the way Jack Nicholson did. He would also only act in films if he were guaranteed a producer credit. When I ask about the email, De Niro starts: "I don't think that the email..." before tailing off and beginning again: "Who knows where that email came from. I don't know what to say. I'd hate to think that the email actually came from someone at CAA because that would be beneath them. It's like getting an obscene phone call; you just don't know where it came from."
As for the view in the email that he's been coasting in comedies that are simply easy paydays, De Niro puts his case strongly. "Comedies are harder to do than people think. Also, it depends on what type of comedy I'm asked to do. It can be gruesome when the director doesn't know how to make you funny or what your sensibility is, or you fail to have a mutual understanding about what you both think comedy is. It can be slapstick funny, or another funny.
"The thing is not to get into a situation or work with a director who tries to make you do comedy that's something you can't do. You have to work with a director who respects what you can do and encourages you instead of imposing something on you that you can't do."
The change in agency is a signal that De Niro now wants to refocus on acting. The big question is whether he can become respected again. De Niro seems to think so. I'm not so sure. None of De Niro's acting heroes had a successful acting career into their sixties. Brando pretty much gave up acting after Apocalypse Now, doing a film only when he needed a payday. Dean died before his career even got started, and Clift was only 45 when he had a heart attack.
It's now up to De Niro to prove his doubters wrong. On the criteria he'll use to choose roles, he says: "If you're an actor, the director and the script are the most important things. Then you ask, 'Who else is going to be in the movie?' All those things are important. You can't have total control of everything, but you can have an idea about where it will go."
De Niro has chosen to achieve this by going back to directors and actors he knows best. The next time we'll see him on screen, he'll be renewing his acquaintance with Al Pacino in the police crime thriller Righteous Kill. Just one scene with De Niro and Pacino together in 1995, in Heat, was the talk of cinema; today audiences are crossing their fingers that the two great actors will not embarrass themselves.
The way The New Yorker talks about the film suggests that we're about to see De Niro back at the top of his game. And yes, it was a project De Niro pushed to get made. "It was something that came along and I mentioned it to Al and he was interested," De Niro says. "In Heat, we only had one scene together, which is my favourite scene in the movie; I thought it was well written and was a great scene to watch, so I wanted to build on that." They should have plenty of scenes together this time as they play two veteran New York detectives in Joe Avnet's film.
De Niro also confirms that the day he'll work with Scorsese again is coming ever nearer. Without revealing any details of what will be their ninth film together, he says: "We're planning on it, but it takes a lot of time to get everything in place. I don't know when it will be, but I think the production will start this time next year." He also reveals that there are plans for a 10th and perhaps final collaboration.
It's not just as an actor that De Niro is looking forward. His growing allegiances as a director are reflected in plans to make two sequels to his 2006 CIA thriller The Good Shepherd. He says: "I would like to do another story from 1961 until 1989 and the fall of the Berlin Wall. That is what we were talking about now. Then I'd like to do a third film from 1989 to the present. I'd like to make it a trilogy."
De Niro is excited at the prospect of working with these actors again. He says: "I like to direct actors a lot. One thing you always have to be aware of is that the casting is 95 per cent of it. If you get the right actor, most of your problems are solved and you just need to make little adjustments along the way – like, when I did A Bronx Tale, I used actual young kids from the neighbourhood where it was set. I didn't want to use young kids who'd done some commercials and worked on other films who knew nothing about that world and that culture. Because they're young, they cannot understand the complexity. If I couldn't have got certain actors in The Good Shepherd, Matt Damon and a couple of others, I would not have done the movie. To make a film is so much hard work, and if you don't have the right combination it's not going to work."
The return to more serious acting is a signal of intent from De Niro that he's not going to let his reputation go without a fight.
'Righteous Kill' opens on 19 September; 'What Just Happened?' opens on 10 October

Comments
14 Comments
KB is dead-on about his comment on Brando. Cynically (and a part of MB was very cynical indeed) he did a flick or two to keep his island life, and "The Freshman" was an amazing performance by someone who still could dominate a screen and not just because of his size.
DeNiro chose less than ideal material lately, but then again, he has given the public so much over the years that in a way, if he pulled a "Brando" to make an easy buck or two, who are we to judge? I am glad he's planning a return to more serious acting, though, lest he be remembered in the wrong light...also, because he is in the lucky position of being ABLE to find quality roles at an older age, I should hope he will take them.
As for retiring, the world has enough "ageism" already, so blathering on about making these guys quit is a bit distasteful. If they got it, I say, let them use it...the same goes for actresses, who have had a hard time for decades getting plum roles once past "a certain age".
Posted by K Douglas | 30.07.08, 12:15 GMT
Hi, Interesting take on DeNiro, just a pointer.
brando didnt give up acting post APOC NOW, coz he was brilliant in A dry white Season and the Freshman and had decent star turns in DOn Juna and the Score.
ofcourse he acted in some trashy films also, and they were for the money. but thats brando he always did it for the money so that he could lead his life the way he wanted to...
if people cant see the genius at work in A dry white and the freshman which he did when he was 63 and 64, then they need help.
cheers,
Posted by KB Rai | 28.07.08, 06:14 GMT
'a dose of reality'??? if you (and the journalist of this article) had bothered to check your sources you'd know that there was never a CAA email, it was only a anonymous post left on a well known hollywood blog, that quickly turned into a case of chinese whispers and taken seriously, even the blogger and CAA have confirmed they had nothing to do with it- because it was such a chicken post- so taking reviews from it for de niro's upcoming films or his attitude is idiotic.
Deniro can do what he wants- If he wants to make millions from comedies or go back to serious scorsese film-making he can, because he's Robert Deniro- and 30 odd years of making classic films, classic characters, reinventing acting and thrilling millions with his work entitles him to this.
Posted by s1971 | 27.07.08, 17:56 GMT
Wish all these other women could get done with him so I can have a turn. He does comedy great indeed he does and he does everything else he's ever done good. It's nice when there's some powerfully vibrant grown ups around.
Posted by gaias child | 27.07.08, 05:40 GMT
De Niro jumped the shark. This interview doesn't really contain an explanation of why he made such lousy choices in films and roles over the past decade. He didn't chose good scripts, good directors or show any taste.
Pacino, on the other hand, did not sell out. He has been busy making the kind of films De Niro might have done, had he not chased the paycheck.
Posted by Mimi | 26.07.08, 15:24 GMT
And now, a dose of reality:
1) Righteous Kill was one of the films mentioned in that CAA email as being paycheck dreck. Also mentioned was "What Just Happened," which is yet another film about Hollywood actors, by Hollywood actors, seemingly sending themselves up, but in reality, playing to their narcissism.
2) The Tribeca Film Festival as the home for young film makers and artists? Yes, that's why they premiered the most recent versions of Indiana Jones, and Star Wars, and this year, Speed Racer. It's always been about one thing, and one thing only: De Niro's ego, and the social ambitions of his partner, Rosenthal. Before he starts accusing CAA of any wrong doing, he'd do well to look at his partner, and her seeming inability to tell any three people the same story about anything.
3) Good Shepard II? III? The first one was a failure at the box office. But maybe nobody (Hi Jane!) told him that.
Posted by Stevie | 26.07.08, 06:16 GMT
What goes up comes down too.
Life is short, and being a star of any kind is shorter.
Look on the bright side of the life; some have already achieved a lot, even by their own standards.
It is time for some good old logs to act maturely and learn from their mistakes and dont make a big mess of it for what is left of; just retire and make it easier for themselves and others
Posted by Mack | 26.07.08, 01:33 GMT
The last great deniro movie i watched was heat. The michael mann heist movie that also starred al pacino another actor who in recent years has been in some dreadful movies, the worst being s1m0ne. My favourite robert deniro movie is probably either taxi driver or goodfellas and his best performances have definately come from his collaborations with the genius that is martin scorsese. I am looking forward to a return to form for both these actors and hope this movie is where we see these once great actors become great again.
Posted by simon lomax | 25.07.08, 23:56 GMT
He's right when he talks about casting the right people. John Huston used to say the same thing. Cast your actors well and you can keep the directing down to a minimum.
Anotherr example: Clint Eastwood rarely goes beyond 2 takes in a shot. Which keeps the actors on their toes, allows you to use rehearsals in the final cut. And puts you way ahead of schedule.
Posted by Tom | 25.07.08, 22:22 GMT
Bobby DeNiro, you're the BEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm looking forward to seeing you and Al Pacino work together again, especially in the upcoming movie 'Righteous Kill.' All of the comedies you played in were superb! I purchased the DVDs when they became available, just to have in my library. I don't know what this reporter is talking about (downer). Variety in any field is the spice of life and is enriching to the person and the people that person affects. Continue to spread your wings in all areas of the movie business.
Again, you're the BEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'd love to meet you one of these days!
Posted by Marquita | 25.07.08, 21:59 GMT
14 Comments