Director's anger over comedy film's 'disability' warning
Sunday 16 November 2008
Latest in News
On Facebook
Arts & Ents blogs
Motek’s creators speak about their intimate London shindigs
One of the few resolutions I made this year was to try and avoid larger club nights in favour of sma...
Tyrannosaur and Drive: The difference between loneliness and being alone
The prospect of loneliness is probably one of the biggest fears that humans have to contend with. Mo...
The Woman in Black: From page, to stage, to film
Director James Watkins and screenwriter Jane Goldman discuss how they kept up the constant high leve...
Disabled actors last night condemned a move by British film censors to label a new film featuring a disabled cast with a warning stating that the film contains "disability themes".
Special People, a British, feature-length film with a cast of mainly disabled actors playing disabled characters, was given the label by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) along with a 12A rating.
The director, Justin Edgar, is angry about the "unnecessary" labelling. "I was really surprised to get this certificate," he said. "I couldn't understand why a film censor thought it was necessary to make people aware that the film had disabled people in it."
The movie – a comedy which follows a film-maker on the verge of a nervous breakdown who is enlisted to teach a class of wheelchair-users about film-making – has garnered awards and been selected for festivals around the world.
Sasha Hardway, one of the stars, who has previously acted in Stephen Poliakoff's Friends and Crocodiles, felt that the warning may have put people off watching it. "The film is not based around disability," Hardway said. "It's got disabled characters but the film is based around their characters not their disability. If you put 'contains disabled themes', people are going to think it's about illness and that it will be negative or depressing."
After pressure from the director and the film company, the label was removed, but not until after the company had paid for promotional material which still contains the label.
Campaigners for disabled rights questioned the need for such a caveat to appear on films at all. Ian Macrae, the editor of Disability Now magazine, said: "It's the exact equivalent of putting a warning on a Spike Lee film saying, 'This film contains black people.' It's medieval thinking."
Sue Clark, a BBFC spokeswoman, said: "These guidelines are there to give the public an idea of the issues we considered when classifying films. It's not designed to make any valued judgement."
- 1 BANNED: The most controversial films
- 2 Boos in Berlin for Jolie's war drama
- 3 Mona Lisa's 'twin sister' is discovered – 500 years late
- 4 The artist vandalising advertising with poetry
- 5 The Ten Best History Books
- 6 How to pick a Bafta winner! Don't miss the vital clues
- 7 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 1 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 2 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 3 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 The Top 50 Independent Schools at A-level*
- 6 Younger Castro steers Cuba to a new revolution
- 7 Mona Lisa's 'twin sister' is discovered – 500 years late
- 8 Pucker up: The art of kissing
- 9 Scottish town where green is beyond the pale
- 10 Lonely? Shy? Sad? Well now you're 'mentally ill', too
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Day In a Page
Jim Gamble: We are losing the race to protect our young


Comments