Films

8° London Hi 10°C / Lo 6°C

Harry Potter vanquishes the big delay

By Chris Green

Rupert Grint, Emma Watson and Daniel Radcliffe arrive for the World Premiere of Harry Potter And The Half Blood Prince at Empire Leicester Square

Tim Whitby/Getty Images

Rupert Grint, Emma Watson and Daniel Radcliffe arrive for the World Premiere of Harry Potter And The Half Blood Prince at Empire Leicester Square

As the stars of the latest Harry Potter film posed for the cameras in London's Leicester Square tonight, leaders of the British entertainment industry said it could soon become the most successful film yet in a franchise which is already the most valuable in box office history.

The first five instalments have grossed almost $4.5bn (£2.7bn) in box office sales, outstripping both James Bond and Star Wars, and after being delayed for eight months Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince looks set to boost the Warner Bros coffers still further.

Justin Johnson of the British Film Institute said the film had already generated an "unprecedented" level of interest, with more than £215,000 worth of advance tickets already sold for the first month of screenings at the IMAX in London. It seems certain to overtake the previous film in the series, which took just over £400,000 at the IMAX.

He predicted that the final few films in the series were likely to be the most successful of all, due to the "snowball effect" of the franchise and its ability to suck in more and more followers the longer it continues.

"You can't help but think that this film could be an absolute smash," he said. "There's a whole generation of people now who've been brought up reading the books and watching the films, and as it goes on more people are tempted to start at the beginning and follow the series all the way through. It's just impossible to ignore Harry Potter really."

Rupert Gavin, the CEO of Odeon cinemas, said the excitement and anticipation surrounding the film was "very high" and that he expected it to build on the success of the previous instalments.

Producers Warner Bros have certainly pulled out all the stops this time around. The film's budget was $250m (£154m), double the amount spent making the first film, and the company has reportedly channelled a further $155m (£96m) into marketing and distribution.

The hype surrounding any Harry Potter film is huge, but fans' expectations for The Half-Blood Prince were raised even further by Warner Bros' decision to push its release date back by eight months. It was originally due to reach cinemas in November last year, but the company postponed it until this summer in the hope that children would be tempted to see it multiple times during the holidays.

In a statement released last August, Warner Bros' president and chief operating officer Alan Horn admitted that the decision had been taken to allow the company to make as much money as possible from the film, describing the summer season "an ideal window for a family tent pole release".

The company also felt that separating the film's release date from The Dark Knight, another of its huge blockbusters, made good business sense. It is hoping to repeat the success of the previous film, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, which was released in July 2007 and made more than £578m at the box office – almost as much as the first film, which grossed more than £600m and is still the franchise's most successful.

The decision did not prove popular with the film's director David Yates, who admitted in a recent interview that the delay was met with a "huge sense of disappointment" on set.

"It was not something I warmed to initially," he said. "At the time, I was so adrenalised, I was so caught up in the process of getting the film in on deadline and making the movie on a certain schedule, and then the decision to delay was a huge anticlimax. There was a huge sense of disappointment, I must say."

The announcement, which came just two weeks after the film's trailer was released, also sparked anger among the series' huge army of young fans, who began to send executives at Warner Bros hate mail voicing their disgust. One reportedly wrote: "I hope you choke on your own saliva."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

erection
[info]rexxxxxxxx wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 06:23 pm (UTC)
is it true that when men are hung they get a huge erection ?
or just urban myth

Anyone know?
erection
[info]septimusgrunge wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 06:47 pm (UTC)
it would seem you have a permanent one between your ears. Cretin, get back to your tacky hello mags.
Was it theme night?
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 08:25 pm (UTC)
Rupert Grint looks more like Elwood Blues than Ron Weasley in that get up and pardon me for thinking but is Daniel Radcliffe looking more and more hobbitified every time he appears in the news?
Harry Potter and the new messiah
[info]ratcatcher911 wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 09:06 pm (UTC)
If there's one thing that represents the ludicrous greed and artistic mediocrity that plagues our era it is Harry Bloody Potter.
Flanked on one side with the predictable clique of dusty old establishment luvvies and on the other by squawking mobs of dribbling fans, Daniel Radcliffe looks more like a modern parody of Jesus than an actor.
He is the new darling and we must all coo over how wonderful he is in this the latest "chapter" of overrated bullshit.
Well, I'm not cooing. The books are overwritten and unoriginal, they get bigger and longer every time because JK is so revered that no editor dares to cut a word. The result is a turgid splodge of Roald Dahl meets Jacqueline Wilson meets the Koran.
The films are just toe-curling. The usual RADA types wheeled out in comedy beards and fat suits to make us all jump up and down with glee at "the magic of it all". The truth is there ain't no magic, it is a cynical and blatant cash cow whose creators show pure contempt for their audience. And I don't blame them.
And I hear Emma Watson's threatening to get her tits out in future for "the right role" should it come along.
Well, slappa-my-thigh, I didn't see that one coming.
Beam me up, Scotty.
Re: Harry Potter and the new messiah
[info]seajay1504 wrote:
Wednesday, 8 July 2009 at 12:34 am (UTC)
Aw poor ratcatcher911 did your mummy and daddy not give you enough hugs when you were little?

There is nothing clever about demonstrating in public that you are intellectually lazy and a snob to boot. Do you really believe that you can so easily explain 450 million books sold?

If you are correct in your startling analysis then please enlighten us as to why no other book, however much it strives to be 'poorly written and unoriginal', comes within a hundred miles of selling this many copies?
Re: Harry Potter and the new messiah
[info]ratcatcher911 wrote:
Wednesday, 8 July 2009 at 07:59 am (UTC)
If talking about my "mummy and daddy" isn't intellectually lazy, I don't know what is.
Watch online movies free
[info]regieeallen wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 11:17 am (UTC)

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date