Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Logan ending explained by Wolverine director James Mangold

The two meanings behind that last line

Jack Shepherd
Wednesday 08 March 2017 12:41 GMT
Comments

Logan has finally reached cinemas around the world, offering a final and heartbreaking final chapter for Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine that has been rapturously received by critics.

Unlike many other superhero films, Logan focussed on the titular character saving Professor X and Laura, rather than the entire world.

** Spoilers for Logan ahead **

The ending, of course, was terrifically sad, seeing Logan die at the hands of X-24, a clone of himself filled with huge amounts of rage.

Speaking to Collider, director James Mangold spoke about the ending, and why Wolverine’s story ending this way was right for the character.

He begins by explaining how, thematically, dying by X-24’s claws acts as a ‘dark mirror’, that Logan is essentially fighting his worst self, a “younger, more capable, more savage, and without any sense of conscience or morality .”

Mangold continued: “There were several different interesting aspects to me, one is when that part of him, if you look at it for a moment from a psychological point of view, when that mirror image of him dies, it’s very interesting how that becomes in the last minute of the film that he’s alive, the moment where it’s almost like something’s been lifted from him.”

Logan - Trailer 2

“And of the many things I’m proud about the movie, I’m really proud about the way—I don’t expect you to intellectually engage that, but I expect you to feel it.

"I do think you feel that in the wake of that battle when he turns and Laura kneels beside him, that he is suddenly capable and something has gone away inside him and he’s capable of connecting with her and saying things that the guy who has run through the previous 121 minutes of this movie could not have said, until this point.”

Talking about Logan’s final line “So this is what it feels like”, Mangold credits his co-writer Scott Frank, going on to explain how it has two different meanings.

Apple TV+ logo

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days

New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled

Try for free
Apple TV+ logo

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days

New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled

Try for free

“One being for a man who has died 450 times in movies,” he told the publication, “and yet never dies because of his healing factor, he has no idea, it’s like a tunnel he goes into and never comes out the other side, so there was that very literal meaning in relation to death.

“But there was also this moment of him holding his daughter’s hand and seeing utter emotion in her eyes and feeling the purest kind of love which is family love, and letting it in for the first time in his life.”

Meanwhile, we discussed how Logan brings the X-Men series full circle and why Fox should ease up on releasing superhero films for a few years.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in