Films

Rain (AM and PM) 3° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Mad Max's visit to the movies could cost him $450m

Mel Gibson's surprise red carpet appearance with his new girlfriend ups the ante in his divorce case

By Guy Adams in Los Angeles

Mel Gibson arriving at the 'X-Men' premiere last week with Oksana Grigorieva

AFP

Mel Gibson arriving at the 'X-Men' premiere last week with Oksana Grigorieva

The leading man is one of the Hollywood's most bankable stars. His female counterpart is a mysterious Russian with the voice of an angel and an intriguing link to James Bond. The plot involves a spurned wife, a near billion-dollar fortune, and an increasingly messy divorce.

Mel Gibson's suddenly turbulent private life took another step towards summer blockbuster status last week, when he pitched up at the Los Angeles premiere of the new X-Men movie showing off a glamorous new girlfriend: a singer and former employee called Oksana Grigorieva.

The appearance, just a fortnight after the Oscar-winning actor's wife of 30 years, Robyn, unexpectedly filed for divorce, raised the ante in what – with at least $900m (£600m) at stake – promises to be the most expensive Hollywood split in history.

"Mel has been single for almost three years," was how his spokesman explained the pictures showing Gibson, 53, hand-in-hand on the red carpet with the 39-year-old brunette. "It's nice to see him getting out and enjoying himself."

Maybe so. But few things could have been better designed to rile Robyn Gibson, who separated from her husband in 2006 and filed for divorce citing "irreconcilable differences" after the actor was photographed on a Costa Rican beach embracing Ms Grigorieva.

Gibson seldom attends film industry events. Some wondered if Wednesday's appearance marked the start of a "re-branding" in advance of November's release of Edge of Darkness, his first film since a drink-driving arrest in 2006, when he derailed his career by telling a Jewish police officer: "Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world."

Others speculated that Gibson may be softening up his public for a bombshell announcement. The US TV show Access Hollywood has reported that he's actually been with Ms Grigorieva for three years, and the musician is reported to have informed friends that she is pregnant.

The Russian singer has "form" for stepping-out with action heroes who boast Irish ancestry: her 12-year-old son is the product of a long-term relationship with the former James Bond Timothy Dalton. Ms Grigorieva was brought up in Ukraine and emigrated to the UK at the age of 20 to be a care worker, but subsequently studied at the Royal College of Music and launched a career as a pianist and singer.

Further speculation surrounds what Gibson's church will make of the relationship. The actor is a member of a conservative Catholic sect that does not recognise the authority of the Pope and follows an antiquated ideology dating back to the 16th century.

The divorce's greatest impact on his daily life, however, is likely to be financial. Gibson has built up an enormous fortune, making the bulk of his wealth from The Passion of the Christ, which he produced and bankrolled. Costing $30m, the film was released in 2004 and became a commercial sensation, generating $611m at the box office, along with tens of millions of dollars in DVD sales.

Since almost every penny Gibson owns was generated during his marriage to Robyn, which lasted almost three decades, he is likely under Californian law to have to surrender half of the $900m fortune.

A crumb of comfort may come from the fact that this week's outing is unlikely to have damaged his financial prospects. "In California, there is nothing wrong with dating someone when you are separated," said the LA divorce attorney, Lynn Soodik, this week.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

The Daily Mail
[info]fourpie wrote:
Sunday, 3 May 2009 at 05:17 am (UTC)
The Daily Mail has shown the way. (Well 'News of the World' does not count.) I'm afraid celebraties are to be mainstream newsfodder from every news source available, because "it's what the public want". Its an escape from the fact that nothing is being done to bring bankers to book for their crimes, to alleviate environemntal destruction that threatens us all and all the other just causes that cry out for our attention, while we choose to look the other way.
Offensive Terminology
[info]pragueteacher wrote:
Sunday, 3 May 2009 at 07:46 am (UTC)
This is an article about absolutely nothing! Successful man separates from long term wife - finds a new woman who is younger than him - will give wife half of the wealth THEY have accumulated - SO? This is news?

Terms such as 'ups the ante' - 'most expensive divorce' etc are sexist and offensive. It implies that Mel Gibson has to 'pay' for his divorce.

We are talking here about a wife that has given 30 years of her life to Gibson. Presidents and Premiers are happy to state that they could not have got where they are without their partners. Obama isnt only happy to say it, he is proud to say it - again and again.

So why this implication that its the man who made the money? The Passion of the Christ cost $30 million to make. His wife took an equal risk then. Her home, her lifestyle, her kids education, her car etc were at risk if it failed. It didn't fail, it was a success and now she has a right to half the profits of that success.

Oh and for the record, I'm a man.

Re: Offensive Terminology
[info]voodoojedizin wrote:
Sunday, 3 May 2009 at 09:08 pm (UTC)
But he did the work!!!
Re: Offensive Terminology
[info]vgnwtch wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 04:24 pm (UTC)
Yeah - bringing up however many there are in the Gibson brood and holding it all together while your partner's off filming, drinking, and generally making a spectacle of himself is a cakewalk.
Plot takes another twist
[info]pulpyotter wrote:
Sunday, 3 May 2009 at 09:02 am (UTC)
For shame, Indy.
[info]tatcawh wrote:
Sunday, 3 May 2009 at 09:45 am (UTC)
Not only is this a vacuous, pointless Sleb story more suited suited to a supermarket gossip rag, but the headline is directly contradicted by the last line of the article:

visit to the movies could cost $450m ... this week's outing is unlikely to have damaged his financial prospects

?!

Find the person responsible and sack them.
Re: For shame, Indy.
[info]bowesy wrote:
Sunday, 3 May 2009 at 08:22 pm (UTC)
agreed - not what you would want from this paper - sadly it seems it is more likely to be what you get these days

who really cares about this?
Anyone could live on $450 million
[info]lee_ji_me wrote:
Sunday, 3 May 2009 at 09:54 am (UTC)
wow, i really feel sorry for Gibson (not) - and I don't like the angle of ther article insinuating that it is a catastrophe that Gibson may have to part with $450 million to his ex wife
He was married for 30 years to her, she has 7 kids by him and she supported him and worked by him all those years - of course she is entitled to half of THEIR money.
As for the other point, isn't $450 million enough for anyone?
Mad Max
[info]leonore35 wrote:
Sunday, 3 May 2009 at 11:09 am (UTC)
Mad Max is approriate, Gibson is the Christian version of Tom Cruise with his Scientology. He can hardly be considered a 'serious actor' In Brave Heart (a preposterous film which many people believed was history) he was just Md Max in a kilt, in the Lethal weapon series he was still Mad Max in USA.
As for Passion well it was so biased against the Jews it almost amounts to racism. No doubt it went down well with neo Nazis
Still as has been shown so often in Hollywood you don't need to be an actor/actress to make losts of cash.
Re: Mad Max
[info]ggarlick46 wrote:
Sunday, 3 May 2009 at 10:52 pm (UTC)
Mel Gibson turns bigotry and ignorance into an art form in any film he directs,and he certainly does not let history get in the way of a good fairy story like Braveheart and The Patriot.
Putting a Stop the Gossip Rags
[info]soho44 wrote:
Sunday, 3 May 2009 at 02:57 pm (UTC)
To everyone who loves to complain about stuff like this, I have a challenge.

If you really believe that this isn't news, it's a waste of time, etc., then try this. Don't read this, watch it, or listen to it. This means lots of editing since a lot of "news" like this is recycled to fill 24 hours a day of airtime.

No matter how much you want to watch it and say this *** is NEWS?, don't do it. If everybody who feels this way stops, then the MSM won't put it out anymore.

The choice is yours.
Divorce payouts - no thanks
[info]corporeal4now wrote:
Sunday, 3 May 2009 at 08:32 pm (UTC)

The advantage of polygamy. He should go Muslim or Mormon :-)

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date