Law Report: Action is struck out for delay: Roebuck v Mungovin - House of Lords (Lord Goff of Chieveley, Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle, Lord Lowry, Lord Browne-Wilkinson and Lord Slynn of Hadley) 3 February 1994
The House of Lords unanimously allowed an appeal by the defendant, Michael J Mungovin, and restored Judge Taylor's order striking out a claim by the plaintiff, Robert Clifford Roebuck, for want of prosecution.
The plaintiff was injured in a road accident in August 1984. He issued a writ and statement of claim in April 1986. In July 1986, the defendant admitted liability but put damages in issue. During a period of nearly four years the defendant sought to obtain particulars as to the quantum of the plaintiff's claim. In April 1990, the defendant's former solicitors received an affidavit giving specific discovery but still lacking any proper quantification of the plaintiff's claim. In May 1990, the defendant's solicitors wrote to the plaintiff's solicitors, seeking further information. There was some correspondence until May 1991.
In July 1991, the defendant's solicitors issued an application to strike out. Judge Taylor, sitting as a High Court judge, struck out the plaintiff's claim. The Court of Appeal allowed the plaintiff's appeal, holding that, although the delay by the plaintiff had prejudiced the defendant, the correspondence after May 1990 amounted to a representation that the defendant intended to proceed to trial, that as a result the plaintiff had incurred expense and the defendant was thereby estopped from obtaining a striking out order by his acquiescence in the earlier delay.
Piers Ashworth QC, who did not appear below and Howard Elgot (Wansbroughs Willey Hargrave, Leeds) for the defendant; John Toulmin QC and Anne Wakefield (Simpson Curtis, Leeds) for the defendant.
LORD BROWNE-WILKINSON said that Allen v Sir Alfred McAlpine & Sons Ltd (1968) 2 QB 229, which was approved by Birkett v James (1978) AC 297, established that if there had been inordinate and inexcusable delay by the plaintiff causing serious prejudice to the defendant, then the court 'can in its discretion' dismiss the action.
In County and District Properties v Lyell (1991) WLR 683 the Court of Appeal laid down a fixed rule: whenever the defendant had induced the plaintiff to believe that the case was to go to trial he must be taken to have made a representation that the action was to be allowed to proceed to trial and if the plaintiff had incurred more than minimal costs in reliance on that representation the defendant would be estopped from striking out the claim on the ground of the plaintiff's delay.
The numerous appeals to which the 'estoppel' had given rise suggested that law the was not soundly based. Lyell's case should be overruled. Where a plaintiff had been guilty of inordinate and inexcusable delay which had prejudiced the defendant, subsequent conduct by the defendant which induced the plaintiff to incur further expense in pursuing the action did not, in law, constitute an absolute bar preventing the defendant from obtaining a striking out order. Such conduct of the defendant was a relevant factor to be taken into account by the judge in exercising his discretion whether or not to strike out the claim, the weight to be attached to such conduct depending on all the circumstances of the case.
In cases like the present, where the defendant's actions were minor as compared with the inordinate delay by the plaintiff and could not have lulled the plaintiff into any major expenditure, a judge exercising his discretion would be likely to attach only slight weight to the defendant's actions. It was for the judge in each case in exercising his discretion to decide what weight to attach in all the circumstances to the defendant's actions.
To mark Tolstoy's 186th birthdaybooks
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Lego breaks out of the toy box and heads for the gallery
- 2 A bottle of wine a day is not bad for you and abstaining is worse than drinking, scientist claims
- 3 Piers Morgan attempts to save the Union by promising to go back to the US if Scotland votes 'No' to independence
- 4 Tyler, The Creator says having new U2 album automatically downloaded on his iPhone was 'like waking up with herpes'
- 5 Grandmas keep accidentally tagging themselves as Grandmaster Flash on Facebook
Lauren Bacall's last ever performance on Family Guy airs in UK tonight
Fifty Shades of Grey movie: New picture of Anastasia Steele unveiled
X Factor 2014 review: Simon Cowell and Cheryl Cole clashed over Rouge Kiss
Lego breaks out of the toy box and heads for the gallery
Doctor Who, Listen, review: Possibly Steven Moffat's most terrifying episode
Daniele Watts: Django Unchained actress detained by Los Angeles police after being mistaken for a prostitute
George Galloway on Scottish independence: The political class is doing what Hitler couldn’t – destroying Britain
Scottish independence: Nationalist leader Jim Sillars threatens pro-union companies with 'day of reckoning' after independence
Scottish independence: Yes campaign feels the heat as Alex Salmond's NHS claims come under furious attack
Scottish independence: Britain faces 'constitutional crisis' at next election
£23m Birmingham cycle scheme is attacked by Tory councillor for not catering to the elderly