Leading Article: Mr Portillo may bring a new public morality
Saturday 11 September 1999
The prurience of the British press is still much in evidence, however, the tone of the leader columns has been broadly sympathetic to Mr Portillo, even in newspapers that until a few years ago would have thought nothing of declaring war on "poofters" in public places. In the 1980s, "gay rights" were a synonym for "disgusting left-wing propaganda". Now, The Sun and the Daily Mail speak almost approvingly of Mr Portillo's confessions.
We have gay Labour ministers, and nobody blinks. The Tories cannot be far behind. Those who refuse to change are failing to note that they are living in a different world. In the 1997 elections, those who openly declared themselves to be gay did not suffer electorally, even in areas with conservative values. In Michael Portillo's hitherto safe Tory constituency, the gay Stephen Twigg was elected in Mr Portillo's place.
The decision whether to declare oneself as gay must remain a personal matter. The hounding of public figures into declaring themselves - all for the sake of a dubious exclusive - is despicable. If somebody wishes to keep their sexuality private, then they should be allowed to do so, as public figures elsewhere in Europe have long been able to do.
More importantly, however, questions of sexual preference should be seen as morally neutral. Enormous changes have already taken place in the past 20 years. Already, there is an obvious generational difference. Many who grew up in a society where homosexuality was a prosecutable offence are still marked by the attitudes of that time. But social attitudes are changing radically - and look set to change further.
We must reach a point where being gay is simply not an issue. In this respect, both politicians and media can play a role. Until only a few years ago, diplomats were considered to be vulnerable if they were homosexual, because of blackmail. Now, that case is weakened: how can you blackmail somebody who does not regard their behaviour as a guilty secret?
The more that people in public life are open about their personal life, the better it will be. There should be more Portillos and less condemnation.
Arts & Ents blogs
Sherlock's Benedict Cumberbatch 'first sexy Holmes', says Mark Gatiss
Liam Neeson turned down James Bond role to marry Natasha Richardson
Jared Leto: Best Supporting Actor Oscar sparks backlash from transgender community
In Kony's shadow: Shocking photographs reveal brutality of Lord's Resistance Army
Captain Phillips actor Barkhad Abdi struggles financially despite Oscar nomination
Apple's Tim Cook: Business isn’t just about making profit
Thousands of young people forced to go without food after benefits wrongly stopped under 'draconian' new sanctions regime
Ukraine crisis: New navy chief 'defects' and surrenders Crimean HQ as Putin claims ultranationalists forced intervention
Britain's top vet sparks controversy with call for ban on slashing animals' throats in 'ritual' slaughters for halal and kosher meat products
Ukraine crisis: Russia dismisses '3am ultimatum' as 'total nonsense'
If you're horrified by a flame-roasted dog, you should be shocked at a hog roast
- 1 The future of sex: The first female condoms were derided, mistrusted and shunned - but will their modern counterparts catch on?
- 2 South African rhino finally put down after roaming Kruger park for days with horn hacked off and bullet in brain
- 3 Italian pensioner hires an escort who turns out to be his son's girlfriend
- 4 Orgasm machine to deliver climax at the push of a button
- 5 Liam Neeson turned down James Bond role to marry Natasha Richardson