Leading article: What is needed is a real European defence policy
Thursday 09 December 1999
Suffice it to make two points. First, it did not require the existence of a European superstate to underline how pitiful was Europe's dependence upon American equipment and firepower during the Kosovo war - a dependence that has already had many senior officials in Washington insisting, "Never again." Second, fears that Europe is out to supplant Nato are absurd.
For one thing, with the best will in the world it will be a decade before we are in a position to act separately from the US. For another, the overwhelming majority of EU members agree with Britain that the Atlantic alliance must remain the cornerstone of Europe's defence. If France secretly sees the project as a means of ridding us of the Americans, it is virtually alone. What is more, the envisaged 60,000-strong force, capable of swift deployment in time of crisis, will in no sense be a European standing army. Ultimate control will lie not with the faceless bureaucrats of Thatcherite nightmare, deep in a Brussels command bunker, but with individual national governments, acting in concert.
None the less, as EU heads of government prepare to launch a historic defence initiative in Helsinki this weekend, one point made by Lady Thatcher cannot be overemphasised. For all the rousing statements of intent by Blair, Schroder and Chirac, defence spending across Europe is, if anything, falling, not least in Germany.
This trend must be reversed. Whatever "peace dividend" arose from the end of the Cold War has long since been exhausted. We cannot pretend, as some leaders re-assure their hostile electorates, that the problem can be solved by "getting more out of what's there". In vital areas such as command and control, smart weapons technology and, above all, transport, what is needed is simply not there; it must be acquired from scratch.
What matters now are not the ringing pledges we hear from Helsinki (however much they upset Lady Thatcher) but hard decisions about money, taken in national capitals in the months ahead. Without them, the finest defence blueprint will scarcely be worth the paper it is printed on.
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Snoop Dogg and Jared Leto buy a stake in Reddit as A-list invests $50m
- 2 Prince held a Facebook Q&A and this is the only question he answered...
- 3 'F*ck it, I quit': KTVA reporter Charlo Greene quits live on air in spectacular fashion
- 4 35,000 walrus gather ashore on north-west Alaska beach 'for a rest'
- 5 A teacher speaks out: 'I'm effectively being forced out of a career that I wanted to love'
Thrill of the chaste: The truth about Gandhi's sex life
Tom and Jerry cartoons now carry a 'racial prejudice' warning on Amazon
Great British Bake Off, semi-final, review: Richard remains the baker to beat as Chetna begins to flake
'Before They Pass Away': Endangered communities photographed 'like Kate Moss'
'Offensive' Banksy immigration mural in Clacton is scrubbed from wall by council
Exclusive: 'Putin's Russia has been my biggest regret,' says Nato's outgoing Secretary General
The Osborne Ultimatum: Chancellor’s benefits freeze bombshell will affect ten million households
There’s no excuse for Dave Lee Travis’s behaviour, but we need to keep a sense of proportion
Mark Reckless becomes second Tory MP to defect to Ukip in a month
Should gay sex be illegal? 16% of Britons think so
Former Tory donor Arron Banks ups his Ukip donation to £1million following William Hague 'nobody' comment
- < Previous
- Next >