Letter: Art-house variety

Matthew Leyland
Tuesday 16 February 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Sir: Emma Cook complains that the National Film Theatre offers "little diversity" in its programming (Irritations of Modern Life: Art- house Cinemas, 10 February). However, to take one example, films being shown on 10 February included: My Name is Joe; Body Politics Part One: The Feminine; The Stationmaster's Wife; Les Diaboliques; and Rush Hour. That is: British Socialist Realism; the Avant-Garde; New German Cinema; French Noir; and contemporary Hollywood.

On the contrary, it is the modern multiplex that shows a distaste for variety, filling its screens with nothing but $100m blockbusters (and the odd British film - as long as it stars Gwyneth Paltrow), and evincing a great fear of anything without special effects or with subtitles.

Blockbuster cinema can be wonderful - who isn't thrilled to the core at the thought of a new Star Wars? - but there's so much more to the medium.

And the reason anyone would disapprove of There's Something About Mary is that it's a deeply unfunny film.

MATTHEW LEYLAND

London E4

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in