Music

6° London Hi 10°C / Lo 5°C

Even Jackson's burial gets caught in legal fight

Family struggle over plans for funeral and public memorial service that will allow thousands to grieve on streets of Los Angeles

By Guy Adams in Los Angeles

Michael Jackson had global appeal as tributes across the world showed: the Philippines

REUTERS

Michael Jackson had global appeal as tributes across the world showed: the Philippines

America expects its biggest funeral since Elvis. The world is ready for an outpouring of grief to rival the death of Princess Diana. But as fans of Michael Jackson lit candles outside his former homes, or queued to pay tribute at the Hollywood Walk of Fame, they were greeted instead with the sight of battle lines being drawn over the singer's disputed legacy.

Friends, family and former business associates unveiled legal teams yesterday as they prepare to duke it out over everything from the shady events that led to the King of Pop's sudden death, to the billion-dollar question of how the estate should be divided and who should gain custody of his three children.

Even Jackson's forthcoming burial is the subject of legal wrangles. His parents and eight siblings, who spent the weekend at their home in Encino, are hoping to co-ordinate a private service and public memorial event that would bring hundreds of thousands of mourners to the streets of Los Angeles.

Creating a fitting tribute is proving tricky, however. For reasons that remain murky, Jackson's immediate family have so far had no luck in persuading his former entourage to grant access to his will, the one document that could reveal details of how the performer wished his funeral to be conducted.

In the meantime, several blocks of the city are closed to traffic. Some fans continue to converge on the UCLA Medical Center, where the singer was pronounced dead at 2.26pm on Thursday, but the main focus of public grief shifted to Jackson's "star" on Hollywood Boulevard, where visitors queued in 33C heat to add to the growing ocean of flowers, candles and children's toys.

LA's civic authorities are ready to shut down the surrounding area for a public funeral. The most suitable date for that would be next weekend, which coincides with the annual fireworks and pageantry of the Fourth of July holiday, when America celebrates independence from Britain.

Getting Jackson's affairs organised in time seems ambitious, though. In an interview with his father Joe, People magazine quoted a relative saying: "The family has no access to the will. [Michael's lawyers] won't let the family see it ... The family has no idea what to do. They don't even know when to bury him. They don't know what to do about anything."

Confusion still reigns about events that led to Jackson's death. Until yesterday, the performer was widely reported to have been taken ill at home in Holmby Hills immediately after receiving an injection of Demerol, a synthetic painkiller similar to morphine, from his personal physician, Dr Conrad Murray.

Last night, however, Dr Murray's lawyer denied the charge, saying it was "absolutely false" and telling the Los Angeles Times that he had never "furnished or prescribed" the drug to Jackson or his children, who he had been treating for almost three years.

The lawyer, a criminal defence attorney called Edward Chernoff, said Dr Murray had "fortuitously" walked into the bedroom where Jackson had collapsed. After noticing that the star "wasn't breathing ... He checked for a pulse. There was a weak pulse in his femoral artery. [So] he started administering CPR." He predicted that laboratory toxicology tests on Jackson would support his client's version of events.

Mr Chernoff sat in on a three-hour interview Dr Murray gave to police late on Saturday. He told reporters that Dr Murray had been fully co-operative and had "helped identify the circumstances around the death of the pop icon and clarified some inconsistencies".

Those "inconsistencies" are likely to have included Dr Murray's response to Jackson's cardiac arrest. A tape of the 911 call suggests he decided to administer CPR while the singer was lying on a soft bed – even though CPR should always be carried out on a floor or other hard surface.

Despite his denials, Dr Murray has been widely held responsible for the cocktail of prescription drugs that the physically vulnerable star was reportedly taking at the time of his death. They included Dilaudid and Vicodin, two painkillers which are together with Xanax, a sedative, Prilosec, a heartburn pill, Soma, a muscle-relaxant, and Paxil, which treats anxiety.

Suspicion about Dr Murray's role was fuelled at the weekend by revelations concerning his tangled personal and financial history. His medical practice, Global Cardiovascular Associates, was recently served with more than $400,000 (£240,000) in court judgments and faces two further pending lawsuits and several unpaid tax bills.

Those legal affairs could soon become even more complex. Dr Murray is now in dispute with AEG, the firm promoting Jackson's comeback concerts, which had recently hired him to accompany the singer to London throughout the 50 gigs that were due to start at the O2 in just over a fortnight.

Mr Chernoff yesterday claimed that the concert promoter, which is already facing substantial losses from Jackson's death, now owes Dr Murray some $300,000 in "back-pay". AEG disagrees, with its lawyers saying they had not yet formalised their business relationship.

In the court of public opinion, Dr Murray continues to face an uphill struggle. Several of Jackson's former friends came forward at the weekend claiming that the star had for years surrounded himself with medical advisers who acted as "enablers", earning hundreds of thousands of dollars by prescribing painkilling drugs which he had been addicted to, on and off, since the mid-1980s.

Staff who attempted to intervene were frequently sacked. Grace Rwaramba, the nanny to Jackson's three children who was dismissed six months ago after one such "intervention", told yesterday's Sunday Times how she had been forced to pump his stomach "several times" to remove dangerous cocktails of drugs. "He always mixed so much of it..." she said. "There was one period that it was so bad that I didn't let the children see him ... He always ate too little and mixed too much."

The likely controversy over the substances in Jackson's system has persuaded his family to order a second autopsy. They hope to get results of toxicology tests before the LA County Coroner's office, which said that results to its official investigation may take between four and six weeks to arrive.

Jackson's mother, Katherine, whom he remained close to throughout his life, yesterday hired one of his lawyers to represent the family's legal interests. Londell McMillan, a founding partner of international law firm Dewey & LeBoeuf, represented Jackson in last year's resolution of a breach of contact lawsuit filed in London by a Bahraini prince.

McMillan has had several high-profile celebrity clients, including Prince, and is the publisher of The Source, a hip-hop magazine. As well as protecting the financial interests of the singer's estate, he will co-ordinate the family's efforts to gain custody of his three children, Prince Michael, 12, Paris, 11, and Prince Michael II, seven, who is also known as Blanket.

The two eldest children are the offspring of Debbie Rowe, Jackson's second wife and former nurse. The youngest was born to a surrogate mother, who was picked from a catalogue. A judge will be called on eventually to decide who should bring up the children, and legal experts are divided as to whether Rowe or Katherine Jackson has the most persuasive claim.

The family has yet to publicly discuss the issue, but released an extended joint statement at the weekend, disclosing their sense of loss.

"In one of the darkest moments of our lives we find it hard to find the words appropriate to this sudden tragedy we all had to encounter," it read. "Our beloved son, brother and father of three children has gone so unexpectedly, in such a tragic way and much too soon. It leaves us, his family, speechless and devastated to a point where communication with the outside world seems almost impossible at times. We want to thank all of his faithful supporters and loyal fans worldwide, you – who Michael loved so much.

"Please do not despair, because Michael will continue to live on in each and every one of you. Continue to spread his message, because that is what he would want you to do. Carry on, so his legacy will live forever."

Meanwhile organisers of last night's Black Entertainment Television awards, which recognises the best in music, acting and sports, revamped the show to honour Jackson and his artistic legacy. Previously announced acts, such as Beyonce and Ne-Yo, changed their planned performances while other artists who had not planned to attend, including Usher and Justin Timberlake, tried to catch last-minute flights to the Shine auditorium in Downtown Los Angeles to participate.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Drugs
[info]leonore35 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 07:40 am (UTC)
In view of his medical condition about which there seem to be divided opinions, it seems unlikely that MJ would have been able to do 50 concerts in London without collapse.
I hope his life of drug dependence and its consequences will not be lost on those 1000s of young people experimenting with drugs today
Re: Drugs
[info]nightside242 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 12:11 pm (UTC)
This doesn't really prove anything about drugs, as these were available on prescription. The only thing it really proves is that if you have money, you can feed an addiction to drugs without people complaining about it or going to jail (which, admittedly, wouldn't have happened in this case), because the doctors will proscribe them for you all day long if they're getting money. I'm not sure that this would have happened in a health servie such as the NHS, where doctors are under no financial incentive to keep proscribing drugs, but I'm absolutely not an expert in that area.
The vultures are circling...
[info]mr_scummy wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 07:43 am (UTC)
"Friends, family and former business associates unveiled legal teams..."

So, as usual, the only people guaranteed to win from this mess are the lawyers.
Sad in so many ways
[info]theelectrician wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 08:40 am (UTC)
No one could deny his artistic and creative abilities and energy but his life was, unfortunately, sad and pathetic in many ways. Now that he has died, his ending and the final goodbyes are turning into a sad and pathetic circus. Where is compassion, where is love, where is dignity? There seems to be none, except perhaps in the private moments of those few who were truly his friends but their voices are small and their dignity will not be noticed.
Back to reality.
[info]proximaking wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 09:37 am (UTC)
Given that he is dead surely all anyone should be bothered about is getting those kids back to their parents and away from that lunatic disfunctional family of his. Michael Jackson was no more their father than pigs can fly. Am I the only one to forget about all the hype and remember the most important things? He almost certainly didn't abuse young boys but one thing is crystal clear he has abused his "children" by keeping them away from their mothers and fathers. If a white family did this to a set of black kids there would be hell to pay and the Law would step in forthwith and demand they be raised within their own ethnic group as the social worker mantra goes, ....... funny how it never happens the other way round. Aren't most people appalled at what Madonna has done in breaking up kids from their families? Why the reserve then about what the Jackson family has done and will try to continue doing to those children? The Law should step in in this case and in the case of Madonna, these children whatever their colour have rights and they should be protected from maurauding rich people of whatever colour. The director of Everychild hit the nail on the head when she slagged Madonna off and it is about time people started slagging the Jacksons off too, ..... the emperors have no clothes.

It just proves that it doesn't matter who you are?
[info]sol3sunrise wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 02:39 pm (UTC)
You can be a world superstar or an ordinary Joe. Families will always fight over arrangements and wills and who knows best. But surely a lawyer who has information regarding a clients last wishes should be decent enough to share these with the next of kin at least.

And - if a birth mother can happily sign away her children to someone/anyone, what right does she have to want them back when they become heirs to a potential legacy of millions of dollars? None surely!? I just hope and pray they now get the love and care of a family who will put their needs first for a change and give them as normal an upbringing as is possible in the circumstances.
death
[info]johnnywi wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 07:08 pm (UTC)
Jackson abused so much his whole life. It's a wonder he lived as long as he did

Most popular in Arts & Entertainment

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date