If You Don't Let Us Dream We Won't Let You Sleep, Royal Court, London
Thursday 21 February 2013
Anders Lustgarten's play begins, promisingly enough, as a dystopian satire which takes us on a darkly absurd extrapolation of the “market knows best” approach to austerity.
A government official (played by Meera Syal) meets with business representatives to discuss a new proposal. The financially burdensome culture of dependency can be eradicated, they decide, by the introduction of “Unity Bonds” that will give the investor a return if the number of people committing crimes or receiving treatment for drug addictions, say, falls to a certain level, thus shifting the cost of social repair (and the incentive to bring it about) to the private sector.
Performed by a game, multi-tasking cast in Simon Godwin's starkly stripped-back 75-minute production, the play moves forward in abrupt jumps as it shows how meeting targets rather than answering human needs is now more than ever the priority. If, for example, the goal is to reduce waiting lists, then “one rather efficient way to achieve that is not to let people on them”, as an old lady (Susan Brown) discovers when she is refused treatment at the hospital where she worked as a nurse for forty two years.
Lustgarten's disgust is bracing as he begs to differ, big-time, from David Cameron who is heard, in a 2012 speech, professing that “where they work properly, open markets and free enterprise can actually promote morality”.
But this author's skills as a polemicist, seemingly a stranger to self-doubt, still far exceed his talents as a dramatist, as is exemplified by unabashed clumsiness of the long final scene where of a group of activists in a squatted courtroom prepare to put the entire capitalist system on public trial.
Lustgarten is right to castigate the cosiness of much political drama but this play operates within a comfort zone of its own. A sacked young ex-trader, who is allowed to put up only token-sounding resistance, is treated by the affectionately guyed activists to slabs of Wikipedia on different cultural concepts of debt, including the doctrine of “odious debt” which holds that if the debt has been incurred for sectional rather than national interests, the people aren't obliged to pay it back. But would that cover the bank bail out?
And are they right to see austerity as a con-trick designed to effect a massive redistribution of wealth? Conveniently ending before the debate proper begins, the play never subjects these contentions to sufficiently rigorous scrutiny.
If You Don't Let Us Dream, We Won't Let You Sleep is at the Royal Court Theatre until 9 March, 0207 565 5000.
film Sex scene trailer sees a shirtless Jamie Dornan turn up the heat
Maisie Williams single-handedly rises to the challengeTV
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 Venezuela Expo Tattoo 2015: Extreme body art from 'Vampire Woman' to 109mm earlobes
- 2 Saudi preacher who 'raped and tortured' his five -year-old daughter to death is released after paying 'blood money'
- 3 Ball pool for adults opens in London
- 4 Game of Thrones season 5 trailer: The first full-length look is here
- 5 Rashida Jones speaks out against male-centric porn saying 'women should have sex and feel good about it'
Venezuela Expo Tattoo 2015: Extreme body art from 'Vampire Woman' to 109mm earlobes
Game of Thrones really doesn't want Danny Dyer - EastEnders star rejected three times
Game of Thrones season 5 trailer: The first full-length look is here
Sia apologises for 'Elastic Heart' music video that sees Shia LaBeouf wrestle 12-year-old Maddie Ziegler
The secret joke hidden in Silence of the Lambs' most famous line
9 reasons Greece's experiment with the radical left is doomed to failure
Have we reached 'peak food'? Shortages loom as global production rates slow
Greece elections: Syriza and EU on collision course after election win for left-wing party
British grandmother Lindsay Sandiford faces execution by firing squad in Indonesia
Liberal Democrat minister defends comments suggesting immigration causes pub closures
King Abdullah dead: We can't afford not to hold Saudi Arabia's royals to account