Pythons annoyed by 'inaccurate' portrayal of debate in BBC drama
Rob Sharp is a freelance journalist specialising in arts and culture. He was on staff at The Independent from July 2007 to December 2011, first as a features writer, and then as the paper’s arts correspondent. He has written for a wide range of newspapers and magazines. For more information visit his website, www.robsharp.com or email him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Monday 10 October 2011
It was supposed to be a tribute to one of Monty Python's most famous moments, when the comedians took on religious figures incensed by their 1979 satire The Life of Brian. But the writers and producers behind the BBC's forthcoming comedy drama Holy Flying Circus have angered rather than flattered them.
The programme, to be screened on 19 October, focuses on incidents including the 1979 television debate between Pythons John Cleese and Michael Palin, and the Bishop of Southwark and Malcolm Muggeridge.
Over 30 years later, Holy Flying Circus, written by Tony Roche, co-writer of In the Loop, is billed as a "fantastical reimagining" of those events. However, Cleese and Iain Johnstone, who produced the original TV debate, have now protested against historical inaccuracies in the show.
A source close to Cleese said he offered to meet Holy Flying Circus's producers, Talkback Thames and Hillbilly Television, at an early stage but the meeting never occurred. The source said Cleese had subsequently seen a copy of the script and was "disappointed by its content", given it was "not a fair reflection of the facts" and was "full of inaccuracies".
Another former Python Terry Gilliam, speaking in an interview published in The Independent today, said some members of the group disliked the idea of the new drama, "because it's not us". Johnstone said: "Michael Palin didn't want to be involved in the project. John would have liked to have been consulted but wasn't."
He added that he was "annoyed" he was originally told by the producers that Holy Flying Circus would be along the lines of Peter Morgan's meticulously researched 2006 play Frost/Nixon. He raised concerns about the script's accuracy, including the portrayal of the Pythons' dealings with the Christian watchdog Nationwide Festival of Light, which he felt was exaggerated.
"Why bother to put in made-up material? They could've researched it properly and it would've been just as funny," he said. Palin and Talkback Thames refused to comment.
Arts & Ents blogs
Apple's Tim Cook: Business isn’t just about making profit
Thousands of young people forced to go without food after benefits wrongly stopped under 'draconian' new sanctions regime
Ukraine crisis: New navy chief 'defects' and surrenders Crimean HQ as Putin claims ultranationalists forced intervention
Britain's top vet sparks controversy with call for ban on slashing animals' throats in 'ritual' slaughters for halal and kosher meat products
Ukraine crisis: Russia dismisses '3am ultimatum' as 'total nonsense'
If you're horrified by a flame-roasted dog, you should be shocked at a hog roast
- 1 The future of sex: The first female condoms were derided, mistrusted and shunned - but will their modern counterparts catch on?
- 2 South African rhino finally put down after roaming Kruger park for days with horn hacked off and bullet in brain
- 3 Italian pensioner hires an escort who turns out to be his son's girlfriend
- 4 Orgasm machine to deliver climax at the push of a button
- 5 Liam Neeson turned down James Bond role to marry Natasha Richardson