Wednesday Law Report: Grant of interim relief in public law case
7 October 1998 Regina v Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, ex parte Monsanto plc Queen's Bench Divisional Court (Lord Justice Rose and Mr Justice Bell) 31 July 1998
Wednesday 07 October 1998
The court refused an application for interim relief by Monsanto plc against Clayton Plant Protection Ltd, pending a decision of the European Court of Justice as to the correct interpretation of Article 4(1)(b) of Council Directive 91/414 (EC).
Monsanto had developed and marketed Roundup, currently the world's best- selling herbicide, since its approval. The patent had run out in 1991 and protection for Monsanto's data had expired in 1996. The data had then become available for use by other generic manufacturers seeking "me too" approval for glyphosphate-based herbicides.
In 1997 Monsanto was granted leave to move for judicial review of the manner in which the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food ("MAFF") granted "me too" approvals pursuant to Part III of the Food and Environment Protection Act 1985 and the Control of Pesticides Regulations 1986, and also of the grant of a "me too" approval to I Pi Ci.
It was Monsanto's case that MAFF, in granting "me too" approvals in reliance on old data, were in breach of Article 4(1)(b) of Council Directive 91/414 (EC) by failing to require data "in the light of current scientific and technical knowledge". I Pi Ci gave an undertaking not to market pursuant to their approval, the proceedings were stayed, and questions as to the correct interpretation of Article 4(1)(b) were referred to the European Court of Justice, which was unlikely to give its decision before the year 2000.
Monsanto was subsequently granted leave to move for judicial review challenging the grant of a "me too" approval to Clayton in respect of its product Rhizeup. It was common ground that those proceedings should also be stayed pending the decision of the European Court, and the question arose whether Monsanto should be granted interim relief in the form of a stay of the operation of the approval of Rhizeup. Clayton had proffered ceiling undertakings limiting the sales of Rhizeup.
Gerald Barling QC, Sarah Lee and Mark Hoskins (S.J. Berwin) for Monsanto; Peter Mantle (Legal Department, Ministry of Ariculture, Fisheries and Food) for MAFF; Martin Howe QC and Lindsay Lane (Addleshaw, Booth & Co, Manchester) for Clayton as intervenor.
Lord Justice Rose said that it was common ground that in deciding whether to grant the relief sought, the court must have regard to the principles enunciated by Lord Diplock in American Cyanamid v Ethicon Ltd  AC 396.
Although those principles were to be applied in the present case, that had to be done in the context of the public law questions to which the judicial review proceedings had given rise.
There was plainly an issue to be tried in the present case, but Monsanto had no sustainable claim for relief based on the inadequacy of damages, whereas it was doubtful that damages would provide an adequate remedy for Clayton.
With regard to the balance of convenience, where an order for interim relief would have the effect of restricting free competition, there was a strong presumption against the making of such an order; there was no suggested hazard to health or to the environment, which was an important objective of the Directive, from the use of Rhizeup; applications for "me too" approval should not be discouraged by the prospect that the costs thereof might be irrecoverable for a period of years if a competitor obtained interim relief, particularly when its patent and data protection had expired; it was in the public interest that the decision of a public body should be respected until set aside; and the purpose of the licensing provisions was to serve the public interest, not to protect private commercial interests, which were catered for by patent and data protection.
The best TV shows and films coming to the servicetv
Watch the new House of Cards series three trailerTV
Oscars 2015It was the first time Barney has compered the Academy Awards
Oscars 2015 From Meryl Streep whooping Patricia Arquette's equality speech to Chris Pine in tears
Oscars 2015 Mexican filmmaker uses speech to urge 'respect' for immigrants
TV ReviewThe intrigue deepens as we delve further but don't expect any answers just yet
Razzies 2015 Golden Raspberry Awards 'honours' Cameron Diaz and Kirk Cameron
Arts & Ents blogs
- 1 This restaurant has misunderstood the concept of 'cheese and biscuits'
- 2 Raif Badawi, the Saudi Arabian blogger sentenced to 1,000 lashes, may now face death penalty
- 3 Delhi bus rapist blames dead victim for attack because 'girls are responsible for rape'
- 4 PornHub turns masturbation into energy in bid to save the planet
- 5 Have sex with your iPad thanks to the new sex toy no-one asked for
Broadchurch series 3: David Tennant and Olivia Colman to return for third season, ITV confirms
Poldark star Heida Reed says show is not that racy: 'I don't think a single bodice gets ripped'
House of Cards season 3: Claire Underwood is based on an eagle, says Robin Wright
Game of Thrones season 5 spoilers: What we can expect according to George RR Martin's books
Fifty Shades of Grey movie shows first sex scene 'after 40 minutes'
New theory could prove how life began and disprove God
This is what it's like to be dead, according to a guy who died for a bit
End of the licence fee: BBC to back radical overhaul of how it is funded
'Jihadi John': CAGE representative storms off Sky News accusing Kay Burley of Islamophobia
Ukip would cut billions from Scottish budget to fund English tax cuts
Nearly 100,000 of Britain's poorest children go hungry after parents' benefits are cut