Green Living

Showers (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 10°C / Lo 6°C

Asda is 'least green' of all supermarkets, watchdog finds

US-owned chain reacts angrily to 'inaccurate, misleading' report

By Martin Hickman, Consumer Affairs Correspondent

Milton Keynes' Asda

The fish counter at Milton Keynes' Asda: Consumer Focus discovered that the chain stocked only a small proportion of sustainably caught fish

ASDA's environmental performance has worsened in the past two years, making it the least green of the five major supermarket chains, according to a report from a publicly funded consumer watchdog.

Consumer Focus complained that Britain's second biggest supermarket chain stocked only a small proportion of sustainable fish and sourced a "dismal" 59 per cent of fresh produce from Britain, a seventh less than 2007.

Among other problems, Asda had reduced its range of organic produce by 38 per cent and was making little use of packaging certified by the Forest Stewardship Council, according to the report, Green to the Core?

In a rating from A to E, the survey downgraded Asda from a C two years ago to a D – the same as Aldi and Lidl.

Britain's biggest retailer, Tesco, "showed no progress since 2007", warranting a C along with the Co-op and Morrisons, according to Consumer Focus.

For the first time since the supermarket rating was launched by its predecessor, the National Consumer Council, three years ago, the top A score was achieved – by Marks & Spencer and Sainsbury's.

M&S had put doors on all freezers and was excelling on Fairtrade and animal welfare, while Sainsbury's scored highly on packaging, organics and sustainable fish.

Waitrose, which had the highest proportion of home-grown fresh produce on sale, 92 per cent, maintained its B rating.

Consumer Focus carried out checks of stores belonging to the chains in Manchester in July, when it said there was ample scope to stock local fruit and vegetables.

Assessors checked the availability and promotion of fresh produce, organics, higher welfare meat and eggs and sustainably sourced fish, and action on climate change and packaging.

Lucy Yates, the report's author, challenged supermarkets to help customers of all budgets to shop green by running money-off promotions and displaying recipes for seasonal British produce such as spinach and courgettes.

"Shopping green should not be hard," she said. "Our survey shows that when a grocer has the will to respond to consumer pressure on green issues, this works through to the shop floor."

Asda, owned by the US grocery giant Walmart, responded angrily to the report. "The Consumer Focus report Green to the Core? isn't worth the recycled paper it's written on," said Asda, which has 16 per cent grocery market share. "It's inaccurate and misleading."

The supermarket said that sourcing some products in the UK reduced emissions, and pointed out that it had cut carbon emissions in existing stores by 20 per cent since 2005 and slimmed down packaging.

Lidl said it was disappointed with its score, saying it had never given away plastic bags, did not air-freight fresh produce and recycled most store waste.

Aldi said it was continuing to test energy-saving measures, while offering customers "high quality products at low cost prices".

Friends of the Earth's supermarket campaigner, Helen Rimmer, claimed the report showed that some retailers were guilty of exaggerating their green credentials.

"Despite shouting loudly about their green initiatives, some of the biggest supermarkets are still failing to put planet-friendly food on their shelves," she said.

She called for the Government to create a supermarket watchdog, a recommendation of the Competition Commission's final grocery investigation last month.

How green is your supermarket?

A: Marks & Spencer; Sainsbury's

B: Waitrose

C: The Co-op; Morrisons; Tesco

D: Asda; Aldi; Lidl

E: None

A is most green and E least green. Source: Green to the Core? Consumer Focus

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

ASDA's reposnse in full to the report
[info]dominic_burch wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 08:32 am (UTC)
for those of you that want to understand why we believe this report is inaccurate and misleading read the blog from our head of sustainability Julian Walker-Palin www.aislespyblog.com.
Re: ASDA's reposnse in full to the report
[info]billdavy1949 wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 09:38 am (UTC)
Dominic,
It might be worth getting a spell checker while you are at it, or it that US spelling?
Re: ASDA's reposnse in full to the report
[info]dominic_burch wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 10:24 am (UTC)
good point well made! My rage at the report was making my hands shake as I typed...
Re: ASDA's reposnse in full to the report
[info]billdavy1949 wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 10:49 am (UTC)
Rage always make me think of Dylan Thomas' "Do not go gentle into that good night".

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
[info]mostlymumbling wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 11:16 am (UTC)
Consumers must also share the responsibility of checking that their shopping is environmentally friendly wherever possible. If non-sustainable products don't sell, supermarkets will have to change it for something that does.
Consumer Focus supermarket report
[info]cyclome wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 12:04 pm (UTC)
The measures seem very simplistic. Local food mqay not have the lowest carbon footprint. Organic food is not necessarily "good".
The politics of green
[info]chrisjarnold wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 12:30 pm (UTC)
I am surprised that the Co-op isn't at the top of the Green to the Core list and Sainsbury's' are which makes me doubt this survey. Being a government watchdog makes me doubt the value of the survey even more. Nothing run by the government is likely to be free from a hidden agenda, has the right people around the table, or has a well balanced and objective view. I'm open to being proved wrong. I think we have to be very careful of these kinds of reports as what makes a firm green is dependent on what you decide to define as green. Green is like politics, it has many different views. When a report like Green to the Core decides to define what's green it can corrupt the agenda. So proving that the government has even introduced politics into the green arena. And where do they sit in the debate between ethics and green - Fairtrade vs carbon footprint?
Despite being part of Wal-Mart I’m inclined to agree with some of ASDA’s comments on the report. At least ASDA can say they are the only supermarket with a green logo.
Chris Arnold, author Ethical Marketing & the new Consumer (www.ecoethicalmarketing.info)
The politics of green
[info]chrisjarnold wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 12:43 pm (UTC)
I am surprised that the Co-op isn't at the top of the Green to the Core list and Sainsbury's' are which makes me doubt this survey. Being a government watchdog makes me doubt the value of the survey even more. Nothing run by the government is likely to be free from a hidden agenda, has the right people around the table, or has a well balanced and objective view. I'm open to being proved wrong. I think we have to be very careful of these kinds of reports as what makes a firm green is dependent on what you decide to define as green. Green is like politics, it has many different views. When a report like Green to the Core decides to define what's green it can corrupt the agenda. So proving that the government has even introduced politics into the green arena, which can't be a good thing. And where do they sit in the debate between ethics and green - Fairtrade vs carbon footprint?
Despite being part of Wal-Mart I’m inclined to agree with some of ASDA’s comments on the report. At least ASDA can say they are the only supermarket with a green logo.
Chris Arnold, author Ethical Marketing & the new Consumer (www.ecoethicalmarketing.info)
Re: The politics of green
[info]therealmossy wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 01:23 pm (UTC)
Dodgy report doesn't help
[info]mallenbaker wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 03:49 pm (UTC)
If you look at the full report produced by Consumer Focus, the indicators used are laughable, and the ratings based on a trip to small numbers of supermarkets in Manchester. Really, we want to know which of these companies are serious about reducing their overall emissions, not just one token measure such as whether the fridges have doors on or not.

If it had been more robust, maybe the result would have been the same, but I doubt it.

More detail on why the methodology is poor at: http://www.mallenbaker.net/csr/post.php?id=299.
Re: Dodgy report doesn't help
[info]junkkmale wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 03:12 pm (UTC)
Indeed. Who watches the watchdogs?

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date