Big stores counting the cost of ban on GM food
Supermarkets in talks on how to educate public about benefits of science
RICHARD LAPPAS/PA
An anti-GM protester is arrested in Dorset. Britain's biggest supermarkets are considering reversing their ban on GM food as the price of non-GM ingredients soars
Britain's food giants have privately warned that they are struggling to maintain their decade-long ban on genetic modification and called for the public to be educated about the increasing cost of avoiding GM, The Independent reveals today.
As major producers such as the US and Brazil switch to GM, supermarkets are now paying 10 to 20 per cent more for the dwindling supplies of conventional soya and maize, according to a report by the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).
Tesco, Sainsbury's, Morrisons, Marks & Spencer, Somerfield, Aldi and Co-op met civil servants to explain their problems in finding non-GM supplies.
Warning of the price hikes, the report – quietly published online last month – said: "Retailers were concerned that they may not be able to maintain their current non-GM sources of supply as producers increasingly adopt GM technology around the world."
Despite legislation requiring GM food to be labelled in the UK's cafes, restaurants and takeaways, customers were already eating food saturated with GM fat without knowing, added the report.
Although fierce public opposition to so-called "Frankenstein foods" has fallen from its peak at the end of the 1990s and early 2000s, when retailers vowed not to stock anything with GM ingredients, changing genes in human food remains highly controversial.
Campaigners such as Friends of the Earth fear GM crops could damage human health and the environment and place control of the food supply in the hands of a few multinational chemical companies, warning of a "corporate takeover of agriculture".
Despite the potential public backlash, ministers believe it may now be the right time to consider its introduction as a way of meeting a UN target to raise global food production by 2050. Asked whether GM was the answer to his call last month for a new green revolution, Hilary Benn, the Environment Secretary, whose new food security strategy this autumn is expected to move closer to backing GM, praised "science".
Supermarkets and manufacturers can sell food made from GM ingredients grown elsewhere, but must state that products contain GM ingredients.
After meeting industry stakeholders, the joint FSA and Defra document – GM Crops and Foods: Follow-up to the Food Matters Report – reported that there "is some use of GM food ingredients in the UK, particularly in the catering sector where oil from GM crops is often supplied to customers who are working to lower prices, and bulk packs are suitably labelled. It was considered unlikely that relevant information regarding food produced using such oils is provided to the final consumer, as required in EC legislation."
The FSA noted that spontaneous concern about GM voiced by consumers had fallen steadily from a peak in December 2003, when 20 per cent of shoppers were worried, to 6 per cent last September.
Supermarket bosses are rethinking their approach. After delivering the City Food Lecture in February, Sir Terry Leahy, chief executive of Tesco, said that giving in to concern about GM could have been a mistake: "It may have been a failure of us all to stand by the science.
"Maybe there is an opportunity to discuss again these issues and a growing appreciation by people that GM could play a vital role in feeding the world's growing population."
At the time, International Supermarket News quoted an industry source as saying: "I am pretty certain that several parties involved are actively looking for the way out of their Canute-like positions. Maybe the reality of the costs of GM-avoidance is finally striking home."
The FSA/Defra document reported that many stakeholders noted "it may be timely to inform consumers of the issues surrounding GM and non-GM supply chains so that they have a clear understanding of current science, the status of non-GM market being reliant on only a few exporting countries, and the steady increase in GM production".
Tesco was unavailable for comment yesterday, but the British Retail Consortium, which speaks for the major grocery retailers, denied British shops would change their approach. "Retailers are not stocking GM products and there are no plans to change that – it's a response to customers' views," said spokesman Richard Dodd.
Pete Riley, director of GM Freeze, the anti-GM campaign, accused the Government of being "desperate" to back GM, adding that it had pressurised Defra and the FSA into producing a "scaremongering" report. Supermarkets could work with growers to produce a long-term, non-GM supply, he said, adding any store that broke ranks by introducing GM would be "brave".
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Reduce your global impact.
Comments
My biggest concern is that the push for GM crops is driven not by a well meaning desire to produce more food for a growing world population, but by an avaricious desire by a few multinational companies to increase their profits regardless of any collateral damage they may cause to either people or the environment.
The World already produces enough food to feed us all - almost ten times over - but 80% of it is basically thrown away as animal feed.
Food shortages, starving people and hungry children are everyday concious and political choices that we deliberately make. Yes you, me - everyone of us - deliberately choose to allow others to starve.
GM foods are all about profit, power and control, and very little else. Please spare us all your appeals to our wallets... your emperor wears no clothes.
GM is big business, rich lobby groups with influence to force onto 3rd world consumers.
Its all wrong to put profits before all - greedy and evil people...
Also the countries that grow the least food tend to have the most starving children because they have less food per person. Trying to make others feel guilty does not make you right.
GM foods provide cheap food , better quality and greater output per hectare
http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/p
From the article:
"Researchers say the culprit in glyphosate resistance and weed shifts is continuous use of glyphosate in Roundup Ready cropping systems."
For other GM crops it is pest-resistance through having a BT gene inserted which should lower pesticide use - but same story, within 10 years or so pests are back bigger and better than ever, or else new pests have filled the niche. Meaning that in some places pesticide use now exceeds the amount that was being applied pre-GM.
Incidentally, all this was predicted by environmentalists, so maybe you should start listening to them rather than the GM companies and politicians who are being supported by them.
As for better quality, I don't know where you get that, even GM companies don't claim the food is nicer, altough there was a type of tomato developed that had extnded shelf life. It is no longer grown in the US as apparently it didn't taste very nice so no one would buy it. Occasionally stories are printed about this or that "wonder food" which is being engineered which never seem to actually make it to the market. IN any case, we have plenty of real food to keep us healthy, so no need for the fake stuff.
Do we really want a world where nature is dominated by government and mega-corporations, where plants and animals have disappeared, and the climate is rubbished, all to feed ever increasing numbers of poorly educated and indoctrinated wage and dole slaves?
I say NO and personally will stick with that. What my wife and adult children, friends and acquaintances do is up to them, the info is there, it's up to them to access and use it if they think it's relevant. Not my place to force my opinion and activities onto others.
The situation is perfectly fine right now. The GM ban is entirely of the making of the supermarkets. Supermarkets can sell GM foodstuffs as long as they are labelled. The consumer is then free to buy them or not. I expect many people would buy the cheaper GM product, while many others would pay more for the non-GM product. That's how capitalism is supposed to work.
What they want, though, is to remove the need for labelling to make their lives easier. To justify this there will be some spurious appeal to rationality - essentially "there's no evidence that it makes a difference so you shouldn't be able to make the choice". But being free to choose only what someone else deems rational is no choice at all. Without this principle, which they are so ready to sacrifice for a quick profit, they wouldn't be in business at all since many of the choices they offer the consumer are either neutral (homeopathy, most anti-aging products) or harmful (booze, cigarettes, premium added value ready meals).
I'm all fo science, but not using science to overrule morals, ethics and commercial benefit for one type of stakeholder (supermarkets).
In peace.
Now is the time to stand our ground and not have GM foods foisted upon us.
Personally I do not have any objections to the ecological aspects which seem to worry a lot of people, but the economic aspect is what worries me. Particularly, as the seeds remain the property of the big businesses foisting a continuing cost onto producers .
Also, we fail to use all the agricultural land available - there is plenty of options available to increase food supply without playing into the hands of big businesses.
Care to name three ways to increase food supply without "playing into the hands of big businesses" as I don't believe you have any real solutions.
i am happy to say that with the help of my kids my family grows most of its own veg. we freeze a lot of it and preserve it in many ways. we live in the city, of course, we need to buy things too but i refuse to buy anything any more or trade with any companies that are part of this NWO "do as we say" agenda.
read this and weep http://www.prisonplanet.com/bill-to-b
SDchamp.
These people want to own all food. GM has shown its failure time and time again. The US and Canada have been taken over by these lying companies, and just like vaccines, there have been no long term studies done on these foods. When you own the regulators , these things happen.The propaganda is that you are a "luddite" or not "scientific" if you wont accept the crap the promote.
How hese people can look at hemselves in he mirror amazes me.
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?cont
FACT - monsanto has falsified reports about the safety of these products for years. any scientist who has spoken out about them has lost their job.
FACT - countries have been deliberately contaminated with gm crops.
FACT - many farmers and their families have been literally "run off their land" by monsanto as the outrageous price hikes of their patented seeds once farmers become dependent on them.
FACT - monsanto's gm seeds need lots and lots of pesticides and fertilizers that go hand in hand with the seeds produced by monsanto. convenient, i must say.
FACT - a study is conducted every year in switzerland as to the nutritional content of "conventionally" (i have no idea what is conventional about pumping chemicals into and on to land to make things grow from it) grown produce, organically grown produce and bio dynamically grown produce. the bio dynamic is always head and shoulders over the organic and the organic is head and shoulders over the "conventional".
FACT - it has been proven numerous times that organically grown products are better for our health and our environment.
FACT - a farmer needs to obtain an expensive certification to grow orgainic produce but any one is allowed to spray chemicals willy-nilly over the land. go figure!
why is our government and media so intent on forcing us to eat food that is not only bad for our health but bad for our home? why is our government and media hell bent and handing all food production over to a megalomaniac of a company that wants to control all the food crops of the world and therefore who eats? a company that has been proven time and time again to have falsified reports as to the safety of these products.
IMO the people who champion these crops and all the bovine hormone rubbish and the antibiotics that are pumped into dairy cows (please not that majority of these products come from monsanto, and that monsanto created agent orange and has deliberately, not by accident, but deliberately contaminated parts of the planet and always manages to weasel it's way out of it's responsibility with, it seems, an incalculable amount of help from the FDA and the US government)
should be moved to an island somewhere well away from everyone else - them their families and all the elected officials that go against public desire and force these despicable products on us. then they should be the test for these products, them and all their generations should grow and eat nothing but GM produce and we will do a study for the next 5 - 10 generations (when you appreciate that what we have on this planet by way of flora and fauna is a culmination of 4.5billion years of intelligent design i think a study of products with the possible detrimental effect on our environment such as gm products of any less of a time frame than that would be just stupid and possibly arrogant) and if in 5 - 10 generations time everything is just dandy - people are healthy, life is flourishing then fine, i'll eat my hat. but if it isn't, if it tuns out to be some sort of a lie foisted upon us in order to exert more control over us by making us dependent on multinationals for what our great green earth does for free and makes us and our environment sick then we nuke the whole lot and we don't go down that road again.
but alas i guess we can't expect our elected representatives to think long term.
so if UK manufacturers really want safe food, they could shop with us, and we ARE trying hard to out the soy and Canola before they contaminate our lands too badly to be saved.
Gm has produced Less yield more often, Gm companies allow no one they cannot "control" to do any tests. 42 day trial on chickens is NOT a good test to know that GM Soy is safe for eg..yet our criminally corrupt and insane FSANZ is looking to appro that soon. accepting data from Dow/Mon whoever is plain stupid! they LIE they Falsify, they Mislead, they profit!