Green Living

Partly Sunny with Showers 9° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

Electric dream machines: Are they really the future of motoring?

Motorists will be given £5,000 to switch to electric cars, but are they really the future of motoring?

By Martin Hickman

The standard G-wiz has a 40-mile range and 50mph top speed

GETTY IMAGES

The standard G-wiz has a 40-mile range and 50mph top speed

Motorists are to be given up to £5,000 to buy less polluting electric cars in a long-awaited official drive to a low-carbon future.

Under the £250m incentive scheme, drivers will receive Government subsidies to buy a new generation of cars that can be charged up by normal power sockets in homes and garages.

Ministers promised that the funding – first announced as a concession for approving Heathrow's third runway in January – would make green cars practicable for everyday drivers.

"Cutting road transport CO2 emissions is a key element of tackling climate change. Less than 0.1 per cent of the UK's 26 million cars are electric, so there is a huge untapped potential to reduce emissions," said the Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon.

"The scale of incentives we're announcing today will mean that an electric car is a real option for motorists as well as helping to make the UK a world leader in low-carbon transport."

Opposition politicians and transport and environmental campaigners gave the plan, revealed by the Prime Minister in The Independent last week, a lukewarm welcome, accusing the Government of doing too little too late to move to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from petrol and diesel cars.

Britain has agreed to cut CO2 emissions by 80 per cent by 2050. The Climate Change Committee, an independent body established under the Climate Change Act to advise the Government on setting carbon budgets, has recommended an initial 42 per cent cut by 2020. The committee is chaired by Lord Turner of Ecchinswell – Adair Turner, the former director general of the Confederation of British Industry.

Launching the programme at Knockhill Racing Circuit in Fife, where he drove an electric Mini, Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, said: "Britain has taken a world lead in setting ambitious targets for carbon reduction. Low-carbon vehicles will play a key role in cutting emissions."

He added that the Government money would spur British industry to invest in low-carbon technology.

In the past two years the Government has committed £123m towards research and development into low-carbon technology and £20m to encourage local authorities and the Royal Mail to run electric vehicles. Under its new £250m scheme, which will take effect from 2011, the Government will back "plug in" cars, rather than existing hybrid models such as the Toyota Prius.

Most of the money – £230m – will provide motorists with grants of between £2,000 and £5,000 to buy wholly electric and hybrid cars. A further £20m will fund charging points in two or three "electric cities", making longer journeys feasible.

Ministers hope that the scheme will go a long way to tackling the limited range and high cost of electric cars. At present there are few electric-only models available, the most popular of which is the G-Wiz, which must be charged every 75 miles and has a top speed of 51mph. But over the next year, new models from Mini and Smart – and a plug-in Prius – are expected.

According to statistics from the Department for Transport, of the 28 million cars on Britain's roads in 2007, the latest year for which figures are available, just 2,000 were electric and 16,000 hybrid. The new scheme would fund around 65,000 new electric cars – more than three times the existing number, but still only 0.3 per cent of the total.

Motoring organisations warned that the infratrastructure for electric cars would have to transformed to make them viable. "For electric vehicles to revolutionise our cities we need infrastructure, incentives, clean electricity and affordable, practical vehicles," said the AA's president Edmund King.

While welcoming the new funding, motor traders and manufacturers called for Government support to ensure that the beleaguered car industry remains intact during the downturn and can build more energy-efficient cars when the economy improves.

They also called for motorists to be offered incentives to scrap older, polluting cars and buy new ones. A similar scheme has recently been successfully introduced in Germany, and a version may form part of the Chancellor Alistair Darling's Budget next week.

Paul Everitt, chief executive of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, said: "The motor industry is in the middle of its greatest economic challenge and immediate action to preserve the UK sector in the short-term is essential if we are to stake our claim in the global development of low-carbon technology for the future."

Opposition politicians responded to the latest announcement by claiming that they would take tougher action to reduce transport pollution. The Conservatives pledged to build a national network of electric charging points, improve the national grid to cope with extra demand from electric vehicles, and divert £200m from road charging into other green transport schemes.

In a speech on green technology yesterday, the shadow Chancellor George Osborne complained that Britain was lagging behind Germany, France, Japan and the US. "Instead of leading the world on green technology, Britain is trailing far behind. So we must all take the Prime Minister's latest announcement on electric cars with a pinch of salt."

According to the Liberal Democrat Transport spokesman Norman Baker, the announcement was like adding "a small dab of green paint to the rusty hulk of the Government's failed transport policy". He said: "Discounts on electric cars are all very well for those who can afford to buy a new car but it cannot hide the fact that the Government has forced up rail fares and destroyed many local bus services."

At the request of The Independent, the Campaign for Better Transport suggested another way of spending the Government's £250m. It proposed allocating £100m for buses, trebling the Rural Bus Subsidy Grant, £50m for 15 sustainable travel towns, £50m for another 50 train carriages spread across the 10 most congested lines, £30m for 50,000 cycle stands, and £20m for car clubs at new developments and workplaces.

Its climate change and roads campaigner Richard George said: "While electric vehicles have a role to play in reducing transport's carbon footprint, we're still waiting to hear how the Government plans to provide enough green energy to make this an environmental initiative. Throwing £5,000 at people to buy a new car feels more like a bail-out for the motoring industry than the sustainable transport strategy we need."

The green cars

G-Wiz

The market leader. Its fragility was revealed by a Top Gear crash test. Seating for two adults and two small children. Old-fashioned batteries in the £8,500 version give a 40-mile range and 50mph top speed. A more advanced £15,000 version will travel 70 miles and can be recharged in 90 minutes.

Mini E

The E sacrifices two seats to the battery stack. Performance is brisk – this Mini will reach 62mph in 8.5 seconds and go on to 95 mph. It has a range of 150 miles. Some 500 have been supplied on lease to customers in California and New York at $850 a month. Made in Oxford and Munich, 40 may be leased in the UK, says Mini owner BMW.

Chevrolet Volt

A version of this, the Vauxhall Ampera, should follow the Chevy's launch in the US in 2011. As a "series plug-in hybrid" it generates its own electricity as well as taking it from the mains, and uses a small petrol motor to power items such as air conditioning. Healthy UK demand will help the case for making it at Vauxhall's Ellesmere Port works. Practical, but range still limited to 40 miles.

Smart Fortwo EV

Currently undergoing trials, it may go on sale next year. Expect a top speed of 70mph, a range of 70 miles. Price to be determined.

Tesla Roadster

Lotus helped develop this sexy model, which hits 60mph in a Ferrari-bashing 3.9 seconds and has a range of 250 miles. The snag? Its price – £96,000. It is available to order now; UK deliveries next month. Tesla are also said to be planning a saloon.

Aixam Mega City

This is a French take on the concept and has similar performance to the basic G-Wiz. It's conventional rather than stylish, and the finish is a little rough. Available as a two- or four-seater.

Reviews by Sean O'Grady

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Electric Cars
[info]alexweir1949 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 06:49 am (UTC)
Using electric self-drive taxis would be a more interesting scenario. They could be remotely driven to their next customer by a drone-like pilot sitting at base. Such a scheme could eliminate or minimise resistance to using such vehicles.

Mr Alex Weir, Gaborone and Harare
Tansfield Group PLC - World Leader In Electric Cars
[info]mike4626 wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 03:37 pm (UTC)
[info]madeinnations wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 07:03 am (UTC)
There are lots of other electric cars worth a look - like the Warren Buffet sponsored BYD e6, the Mitsubishi iMiev, the French Venturi Fetish, and the stunning British Lightning GT (at lightningcarcompany.co.uk) to name a few.
Graham Rankin, madeinnations.com
Electric cars
[info]jockmoron wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 07:12 am (UTC)
Of course there's a future for electric cars, it's the only future. Internal combustion engine cars are the equivalent of the steam engine just before the Second World War. They have reached the pinnacle of their development, the fuel on which they run is rapidly depleting and they are poisoning our planet.

It's as stupid to question the future of electric cars as it was for canal owners to question the future of the railways in the early nineteenth century or typewriter manufacturers to question the future of word processors. The internal combustion engine car is dead, thank goodness. Get over it. Keep the best ones in your garage for an occasional outing to indulge in some nostalgia, if you must, like a steam railway enthusiast, but for goodness sake everyone grow up and accept the inevitable.

However it also true that the future is one that is less reliant on the private motor vehicle whatever powers it; let's use what money we do have on investment in an efficient, modern and reliable public transport. Encouraging people to trade in their old cars and supporting a backward looking and incompetent car industry is plainly stupid and a waste of money that could be spent much more profitably elsewhere.
Electric Cars
[info]exportskip wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 08:36 am (UTC)
I will buy an electric car IF the manufacturer makes it with the ability to upgrade the power source. I don't want to lay out on a new car and in two years time find that more powerful, wide-ranging models are available. I would like to upgrade my car rather than replace it with a new one (it's not very green to keep buying cars every couple of years). Despite the recession, we are still facing pretty serious environmental issues.
It's an illusion
[info]humble_sparrow wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 08:41 am (UTC)
The future of motoring should be less motors, more walking, using bikes, public transport, not more cars in different guises.

Sorry world, we were born to sweat a little so our heart muscles function properly, fatty tissue is just not good for us.

There's half a zillion of the blighters already and nobody can move for them and there is going to be more of them ?

Sure, battery machines are better in the city because they are cleaner but obviously the pollution and carbon cost is just transferred somewhere else.

It's an illusion - simply as that :-)
I want personal transport
[info]mullerman wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 09:29 am (UTC)
I do not want to sit on a bus next to a snot dribbling drug addict thank you!
Re: I want personal transport
[info]humble_sparrow wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 03:46 pm (UTC)
So the well heeled travelling middle classes who use the railways are all drug addicts with infectious diseases and Parkinson type symptoms ? In fact you might work with such people, I am sure of it.

Oh dear, I'd love to see you say that straight to their faces.

Getting a bike is the perfect one man personal transport system and one does not have to come in contact with the dirty masses at all if one chooses, although personally I am not frightened of talking to most people from all walks of life, obviously you are.

Don't be afraid we are quite harmless and we won't bite you :-)
Re: I want personal transport
[info]wormery wrote:
Sunday, 19 April 2009 at 12:24 pm (UTC)
Get a bike? Yeah right - and see you in hospital or the cremetorium...
Fancy a spin?
[info]another_mark wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 09:32 am (UTC)
According to the times there are no cars which will qualify for the Government scheme. Mission accomplished; publicity, brownie points and we won't have to borrow any more money.

Link
Re: Fancy a spin?
[info]bryonyvk wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 11:10 am (UTC)
Times is wrong then, full electric or hybrid electric cars do qualify. Presently, yes there are very few about but many more are set to be in showrooms by 2011. If you go onto one of the green-car relted websites there are many models which will qualify when they become available and some are quite reasonably priced.
It's an illusion
[info]acidpen wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 10:59 am (UTC)
i agree totally.

Also who wants a car that races up to 60mph in 4 seconds but runs out of juice after 50 miles. The problem is the whole transport system these cars are trying to compete with, the whole system needs to be redesigned not just the vehicles.
Article error - Chevrolet Volt has infinite range!
[info]googlepeakedoil wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 02:05 pm (UTC)
The Chevrolet Volt does not have a range of 40 miles - it has a range of 40 miles in "pure electric mode". It has a 1 litre petrol/diesel engine that will get 60miles to the gallon - but this runs at an efficient speed (like a diesel electric train) only charging the batteries. The batteries drive the electric motor. So with a 10 gallon tank the car has a 600mile+ 40 electric range. The idea is that commuters going less than 40 miles need NEVER buy petrol/diesel. But then you are not limited if you wanted to drive to Scotland or something.
Re: Article error - Chevrolet Volt has infinite range!
[info]r_lawson wrote:
Friday, 17 April 2009 at 10:50 pm (UTC)
So it's range isn't infinite then. It's 600 miles.

The engine may well run at an efficient speed whatever that is (a modern combustion engine is almost as efficient when the revs are varied as they are if constant thanks to engine management systems. Today braking is the biggest inefficiency of a car and guess what - electric/hybrid cars need to brake too!) but the 10 gallon/600 mile element is pure fantasy. Hybrids in petrol/diesel mode or in mains charge mode are less than half as efficient than cars that power the wheels mechanically. Thats due to the losses in the generator, battery and electric motor or the transmission losses in mains charge mode.

So if a hybrid is only half the efficiency of a normal car, a normal car will be able to do 1200 miles on 10 gallons. Yeah right. I think someone has fallen for the marketing bullshit here.


Re: Article error - Chevrolet Volt has infinite range!
[info]googlepeakedoil wrote:
Monday, 20 April 2009 at 12:01 pm (UTC)
The Volt like pretty much all hybrids of course features regenerative braking also.
Braking accounts for maybe 15% of energy tops - and that's in city driving. The biggest waste is oversized engines, and oversized cars, poor streamlining (eg Range Rovers and landrovers, trucks and most 4x4s tick all those boxes).
Electric motors and batteries are around 90% efficient. An internal combustion engine is 30-40% efficient. There's plenty of diesel's out there (eg. the smart car) that get circa 80mpg - so 60mpg is perfectly plausible. The point was the article stated a 40 mile range for the car. This is grossly misleading!
[info]thelivingvines wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 09:16 am (UTC)
How are they not plugging the Honda Clarity? hydrogen powered cars are a much more realistic option given that they have the potential to fit in with our current lifestyle choices as they are, without having to plan our lives around when and where we'll next be able to charge our cars. This ridiculous PR exercise makes the government look as clueless about the breadth of environmental technology as ever.
Electric Dream Machines
[info]1_pink_tulip wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 01:52 pm (UTC)
So what will happen to all the petrol and diesel engine cars? Will they just pile up in junk yards for us to whizz past and see in our super green new electric cars? And what about the resources used to make these new machines? Would it not make more sense to convert all existing cars to electric, thereby saving our exponentially declining resouces? Or is that common sense?!
Don't get me wrong, I think it is a great idea, but what are the environmental costs of making all these new machines when there are plenty of cars around that could be converted?
Sorry to be a wet blanket
[info]madmax48 wrote:
Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 10:06 pm (UTC)
Electric cars are merely an effective means of moving pollution from one place to another. yes they have no emissions, but where is the electricity coming from. They use more fossil fuels per miles driven than petrol or diesel cars. So unless you come up with an endless supply of renewable energy, they are just a feel-good fraud on the public.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date