Green Living

Rain (AM and PM) 11° London Hi 11°C / Lo 4°C

Green jobs: Meet the movers and shakers at the vanguard of the eco revolution

Three years ago, the Government's Stern Review proclaimed that tackling climate change would be a big business opportunity. But where are all those promised jobs? And has the economy really been stimulated? Robin Barton asks the dynamic go-getters at the vanguard of the new eco society how they have fared

Imogen Martineau, 33, is a member of the UN Environment Programme's sustainability team, based in Paris. She says: 'Climate change is the biggest issue we need to deal with'

JEAN GOLDSMITH

Imogen Martineau, 33, is a member of the UN Environment Programme's sustainability team, based in Paris. She says: 'Climate change is the biggest issue we need to deal with'

Green jobs. They sound good, don't they? First off, any job in a recession is welcome. Then you get the satisfaction of, well, let's not be shy about it, getting paid to save the planet. And finally there's the prospect of meeting all sorts of like-minded people and comparing tips on composting. Reality, of course, hits like a blast of biomass.

"We are on the edge of a low-carbon industrial revolution," claimed the Business Secretary Peter Mandelson in March – although he did scale back Gordon Brown's promise of 100,000 recession-busting "Green New Deal" jobs to just "tens of thousands" of new jobs in the approaching low- carbon economy. The definition of a "green job" is equally nebulous. At the executive end of the spectrum, they are jobs in sustainability and corporate responsibility. "Such jobs transcend all sectors of the economy," explains Andy Cartland, founder of leading recruitment agency Acre Resources. But a broader sweep might include cycle ' instructors and furniture restorers alongside hydrologists and climatologists. Indeed, you may already have a green tinge to your collar already without realising it.

As well as jobs in renewable energy, from installers of photovoltaic panels (or maybe you know them as solar panels) and wind turbines to scientists developing biofuel from algae (a technology in which the UK leads the world), there are green jobs in facilities management – has everyone switched off the lights for the night? – and the waste industry. In 20 years, chemical engineers currently employed to get oil out of the ground will be paid by governments to clean up after the oil companies. In the next 50 years, some believe many green jobs will be in climate-change mitigation, such as flood defences and carbon sequestration.

But that's all some way off. This summer, the green jobs revolution stalled on the runway when the Danish firm Vestas, the only major wind-turbine manufacturer in the UK, pulled out of the Isle of Wight. Citing the absence of a viable market in the UK and a growing market in the US, Vestas and its business logic can't be faulted: 425 jobs were lost in Britain but Vestas created 5,000 more in the US and China. The company decided it made greater economic and environmental sense to build its turbines close to where they would be used. Dan Ledger, a wind-turbine installer in the UK, explains further: "The irony is that the British public will be swamped with wind farms in the next five years and the seas off Cornwall will be covered in them, but they won't be made here. If the government had introduced new regulations five years ago during the building boom, it would have been different."

Legislation, says Cartland, drives much of the worldwide green jobs boom, from the £300m for green-jobs training provided by Obama's American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of February to the 285,000 jobs in Germany's clean-energy sector. Munich-based Siemens, Europe's biggest employer, expects to reap an additional £13bn worldwide over the next three years from assorted stimulus programmes, with green tech accounting for 40 per cent of ' the order book. But they see only 500 new skilled jobs in the UK's green sector. Instead, their factories will be in the Midwest of America, where the financial incentives are greatest.

There are lessons to be learnt from across the Atlantic. In a tale of two cities, Professor Joan Fitzgerald, an expert in green economic development from Northeastern University in Boston, Massachusetts, compares the fortunes of Austin in Texas, a high-tech city with a supportive political leadership and an educated workforce, with Ohio's Toledo, an old-fashioned, blue-collar manufacturing city. Which city is thriving today? After updating its industrial base, especially its glass manufacturing, Toledo now has 6,000 new jobs in 15 businesses in the solar-energy sector. Progressive Austin, a city that passed a renewable energy resolution a decade ago, is struggling. Expensively funded high-tech enterprises have delivered hundreds rather than thousands of jobs.

Back in Britain, Paul Cowley of Bristol's Sustainable Energy Installations is complaining how hard it is to find qualified workmen to fit photovoltaic panels: "They're few and far between, so most travel big distances." Yet, despite the recession and the botched introduction of a feed-in tariff, due next April, for home owners with wind turbines and solar panels to sell clean energy back to the national grid, Cowley believes the prospects for installers are good. By 2016, all new homes in Britain will have to be carbon- neutral, so, says Cowley, "the bread-and-butter work for electricians and roofers will change in the next few years."

Are we ready for the green industrial revolution? Although innovative companies such as Elektromotive (see box, page 9) manufacture in the UK, these sorts of stable, long-term jobs and their valuable hands-on skills are thin on the ground. "We are good at finance but aren't performing so well in manufacturing," agrees Cartland. And installers of green technology like Ledger complain they are wrapped up in red tape before they set foot on a ladder. But, with world energy consumption set to double by 2030 according to the International Energy Agency, perhaps it's time to brush off the CV and start swotting up on biofuels.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

ALL NON JOBS
[info]truedenier wrote:
Sunday, 15 November 2009 at 07:52 am (UTC)
Imogen Martineau says "Climate change is the biggest issue we need to deal with". Of course she would say this. It's probably carries a nice big fat salary paid for by bloody hard-working taxpayers.
Agreement!
[info]herbtibb wrote:
Tuesday, 17 November 2009 at 09:17 am (UTC)
Totally agreed - yes the issue of Climate Change needs to be deal with - but unfortunately I have a feeling that her smug look suggests she earns way to much money to put forward obvious reports!
[info]psmccool wrote:
Tuesday, 17 November 2009 at 09:38 am (UTC)
Perhaps Ms Martineau is looking so happy because she does something positive and useful all day long? perhaps she works with a sense of optimism, and believes that she might be making a positive difference every day? Imagine that? Imagine not being bitter? Imagine not being resigned to the status quo? Imagine thinking it was worth trying to do something?
Well done Ms Martineau, I wish you success in reducing energy inefficiency at the UN and personal fulfilment from enjoying your job.
[info]ric1234 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 November 2009 at 01:39 pm (UTC)
I say well done to her for doing something real positive. Its nice to see a hardworking person trying to change the world one small step at a time. And more importantly to see a giant such as tesco supporting those efforts... More than i can say for many people or companies.

[info]ric1234 wrote:
Tuesday, 17 November 2009 at 01:55 pm (UTC)
Bukky Adegbeyeni said "The high point of my job has been working on the zero-carbon store in Ramsey, Cambridgeshire, which generates as much energy as it uses"..

I like the idea of generating as much energy as the store uses... thats cool.
Blah blah blah
[info]nickthelight wrote:
Tuesday, 17 November 2009 at 04:15 pm (UTC)
" Climate change is the biggest issue we need to deal with...."

Not true; AIDS is a far more important issue, and has been with us longer. Of course she's going to say that, it's her job!

Besides, 'UN Environment Programme's sustainability team' is that even a job? sounds like a free meal ticket and a nice expenses package.
My rant at the AGW lobby.
[info]drmace wrote:
Wednesday, 18 November 2009 at 12:37 am (UTC)
I assume the UN has never heard of Richard Lindzen, Wolfgang Knorr or any of the other eminent scientists that all agree that the original work done by Naomi Oreskes ( the basis of the UN's original "consensus" on AGW) was beyond doubt, absolutely floored and Al Gore lied.

Question - When are we going so see both sides of the argument in a balanced debate because this is no where near settled science?

Perhaps Imogen Martineau should research her beliefs. For example, if the world stopped wasting resources on bio fuels (produces millions of tons of N2O - 300 times worse than CO2), there would be more than enough food for the world and greanhouse gas immissions would instantly be reduced. It is not THE solution but it is A solution.

Does Imogen even know how cap and trade works and who makes all the money from the trading?

How many of you have seen the Draft Copenhagen Treaty they want to sign in our name? Read it!
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/copenhagen_climate_treaty_framework_draft.html

Compensation into the £billions per year to the third world from us? £trillions in total. Where will that money come from? Our taxes will rise hugely. Copenhagen will cost not only us, but our children and grandchildren. Why because it will be 0.6c warmer and we can grow more or the sea will rise 20cm and we may have to "adapt"? Is it worth it?

Please read it and be aware. Lets have a debate and make sure it is worth spending the money before we sign. Brown won't care about us he has not in the past (Lisbon Treaty??).

Who!?!
[info]ppthoms wrote:
Wednesday, 18 November 2009 at 04:54 pm (UTC)
How did Guy Smith make it on there? As a farmer I frequently hear or read Guy Smith's comments and he is no fan of the environmental movement and is pretty dismissive to put it politely.. And then you have someone from Tesco, their CSR policies are no more than a sop to public opinion while their business practices are eminently unsustainable. The Independent seems to have missed all the people driving real change.
As for the climate change deniers on the comments - they will be telling us the world is flat and George Bush was good for us next!

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date