The Big Question: What more can Britain do to beat its addiction to plastic bags?
Why are we asking this now?
Because yesterday the Government's anti-waste body, Wrap, announced that plastic bag use in the UK had dropped from 13.4 billion in 2007 to 9.9 billion in 2008 – a reduction of 26 per cent, or 3.5 billion bags.
That's a pretty hefty reduction in just 12 months, isn't it?
Yes, indeed it is; the 3.5 billion bags which have been cut from use, laid end to end, would stretch to the Moon and back twice, or around the Earth 44 times, Wrap obligingly points out (which is a bizarre but undeniably impressive image). On the other hand, we are still using 10 billion bags a year – approximately 166 bags for every man, woman, child and infant in these islands. That's hardly a kicked habit.
So how many of those 10 billion can we cut?
There's the rub. In December, seven of the major supermarkets, which are the leading plastic bag sources, agreed that they would seek a 50 per cent reduction in single-use bags by May this year, as against May 2006. It is not clear yet how they are doing, but the rate of change indicated in the UK figures released yesterday certainly suggest that the target is achievable. But where do we go from there? In December, the Government hinted at a 70 per cent eventual reduction in UK plastic bag use (in Whitehall-speak, this is an "aspiration" rather than a target. Targets you have to meet. Aspirations, you aspire to). Could that be attained? Even if it could, we would still be using four billion bags a year. That's a long way from zero.
Why does all this matter?
Because plastic bags are one of the greatest scourges of the consumer society – or to be more precise, of the throwaway society. First introduced in the US in 1957, and into the rest of the world by the late 1960s, they have been found so convenient that they have come to be used in mind-boggling numbers: in the world as a whole, the annual total manufactured now probably exceeds a trillion – that is, one million billion, or 1,000,000,000,000,000. And according to the British Antarctic Survey, plastic bags have gone from being rare in the late Eighties and early Nineties to being found almost everywhere across the planet, from Spitsbergen, at latitude 78 degrees North, to the Falkland Islands at 51 degrees South. They are among the 12 items of debris most often found in coastal clean-ups. On land they are ubiquitous too. Windblown plastic bags are so prevalent in Africa that a cottage industry has sprung up harvesting bags and using them to weave hats, and even bags, with one group harvesting 30,000 per month. In some developing countries they are a major nuisance in blocking sewage systems.
What matters is what happens to them after use. Enormous numbers end up in landfill or incinerators, itself an enormous waste of the petrochemical products which have gone into their manufacture; but billions get into the environment, especially the marine environment, where their lack of rapid degradability makes them a persistent and terrible threat to marine life.
What threat do degrading bags present to nature?
Sea turtles mistake them for their jellyfish food and choke on them; albatrosses mistake them for squid and die a similar death; dolphins have been found dead with plastic bags blocking their blowholes. The British wildlife film-maker Rebecca Hosking was staggered by the plastic-bag-induced mortality of Laysan albatrosses on the Pacific island of Midway; she found that two-fifths of the 500,000 Laysan chicks born each year die, the vast majority from ingesting plastic that their parents have mistakenly brought back as food. As a result, Ms Hosking started a movement to turn her home town of Modbury into Britain's first plastic bag-free community, which many residents and retailers have enthusiastically joined.
So is a plastic bag-free Britain possible?
Perhaps. Who could have imagined half-a-century ago that Britain's public places would one day all become cigarette smoke-free? Of that we would all be using lead-free petrol? Who would have thought even a decade ago, come to that, that about two-thirds of us would by now be actively engaged in recycling? Major shifts in public behaviour can certainly occur.
So what would be needed to make such a change?
Above all, a general change in consumer attitudes, towards the "re-use habit" – employing reusable shopping bags. Older people will remember how this was entirely the norm before the late 1960s; households, and in particular, housewives – as they then were – had a "shopping bag", a sturdy receptacle which was used to carry items bought in the daily shopping expedition. But that was the very different pattern of household shopping then – the purchase of a much smaller number of items, on a daily basis, after a walk to small shops – which were local. Today the housewife is largely a vanished species, and many of us tend to drive to the supermarket once a week and fill up the boot with seven days' worth of provisions, for which plastic bags, of course, are fantastically useful. It's a hard habit to break.
Why have we seen such a dramatic drop in plastic bag use this year?
Because the leading supermarkets and other retailers are making a major effort to wean us from the habit, with a whole host of initiatives, ranging from "bags for life" schemes to bag-free checkouts. It is clear that habits are starting to change; reusable bags are more visible than they were even two years ago. Wrap's Dr Richard Swannell said yesterday: "When you go into supermarkets or go down the High Street, there is a real plethora of people with reusable bags."
Should the Government be putting a tax on plastic bags?
The Government is considering the idea, and Gordon Brown has said that if actions by the retailers do not achieve the desired result, then direct intervention is a possibility. What people have in mind is the example of Ireland, where in 2002 a levy of €0.22 – the PlasTax – was introduced on all plastic bags, the first of its kind in the world. This quickly prompted a quite astonishing reduction of 90 per cent, from 1.2 billion bags a year to fewer than 200,000, and an enormous uptake in the use of cloth bags – with the revenue from the tax ring-fenced for environmental clean-up schemes.
What is the Government going to do next?
In the Climate Change Act, which was introduced late last year, the Government gave itself the power to bring in a plastic bag levy. You might well think that it wouldn't give itself a power it wasn't eventually going to use. Certainly, kicking the habit completely may well require stronger action. To get a sense of the scale of the problem, check out the website Reusablebags.com, which has a "clock" showing how many plastic bags have been produced so far in 2009. At 6pm last night, the figure was 76.37 billion.
Will Britain soon be a plastic bag-free nation?
Yes...
* The trend in plastic bag use is definitely falling, which suggests we are moving in the right direction
* The Government intends to drive bag use down even further
* Ministers may bring in a tax, which in Ireland has reduced usage by 94 per cent, which will help further
No...
* We are now too attached to the weekly supermarket shop, which plastic bags facilitate
* It is unrealistic to expect everyone to return to the habits of the 1960s
* Plastic bags are simply too convenient for people to give up altogether, and they certainly hold heavy shopping better than paper ones
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Reduce your global impact.
Comments
Anyway, the collapse of the consumer society over the coming years will fix both problems.
I would think the plastic wrapping on products needs to be reduced first, my plastic bags have at least a second use.
However, I do have a question prompted by this, if in another, related area: 'What threat do degrading bags present to nature?'
A lot of alternatives, and also with packaging, now seem to involve biodegradability in various forms. What do these things biodegrade to, and what are the consequences? By my reckoning it can often be Co2 or, worse, methane, and that is surely a concern in greenhouse terms?
Further reading:
http://www.independent.co.uk/environmen
Aldi and Lidl do this over here - how long before the other supermarkets are brave enough to follow their example???
Soon, I hope
Although degradable plastics of various types are now being dangled temptingly in front of us, all promising an environmental El Dorado, oxo-biodegradable plastic is the only one which you can programme to degrade to a pre-set timescale, from as little as six months onwards. Yet apart from the Co-op and Tesco and a handful of fast-food chains, it is not widely used in the UK, though it is becoming popular overseas, particularly in developing countries.
Bags and packaging made of 'oxo-bio' will degrade completely after a short lifespan with no messy fragments for animals or marine life to gobble up. The degradation process is automatic, so it will literally 'disappear' at the end of its short life, even if it is not collected and disposed of.
This is one reason why it has become popular in countries with a big plastic waste problem, but difficulties in clearing their rubbish and waste products. Remarkably, perhaps, for a plastic, the oxo-bio variety is completely free of methane even if dumped in a landfill and you can also recycle it together with other plastics, which should be helpful for environmentally conscious local authorities when the recycling market picks up.
The next viable alternative is hydro-biodegradable plastic, which quite a number of companies are using. It does degrade, but it takes time and you can't "tell" it when to degrade in advance. It also leaves fragments once it has degraded and, sadly, it emits CO2 too quickly and copious amounts of methane in a landfill. Recycling? Forget it! Hydro-bio can't be effectivly recycled.
What we surely need is a plastic which does degrade; does so quickly without harming the environment and which can also be recycled if you live in an area with effective recycling facilites. Other countries seem to have latched on to oxo-bio. Why can't we?
For instance, there is the equivalent of 4 plastic carrier shopping bags in each pack of Sanitary pads and Incontinence products that shifts off the shelf and out the store and into the waste stream, and 10 fold in disposable nappies. None of these products are recyclable. By developing products that are devoid of crude oil derived plastics, as in the case of Natracare feminine hygiene products which are totallky plastic free, we are taking responsibility for the products impact post consumer as they are biodegradable. I fear that focus on the plastic shopping bag has done very little to divert the same amount of zeal towards avoiding purchasing products made from high percentages of materials derived from crude oil such as polyethylene (your plastic shopping bag) polypropylene, the nice soft covers used in sanitary pads and baby nappies, wipes, dishclothes, and of course those fabulous water bottles, plastic food trays and boxes! Lets also distinguish between degradable and biodegradable so consumers are not misled.
If they start charging for it, I'll have to buy plastic bin liners instead. So the amount of waste plastic bags is the same, but I'll have to spend money on it. Not a good idea.
We should encourage minimal use and increase reuse rather than forcing people to start buying plastic bin liners.
-DON'T throw away the little transparent ones you use to wrap your supermarket fruit and veg. If treated gently, the labels come off without damaging the bag, which can be used up to a dozen times and then, once they are soiled or split, wrapped round meat or fish remains to stop them stinking out the general rubbish.
-DON'T use either plastic or paper for carrier bags, neither is strong enough for a big shop. Fair Trade cotton is available from the Coop and is both easier and much more pleasant to use.
"If they give you lined paper, write the other way."
Brian Walker
Shops would make more money through selling reusable bags. Shoppers only need to buy 2 or 3 and keep them in the car or remember to take them to the shop (they manage to travel from the shop with full bags, so surely than travel to the shop with empty ones).
All it takes is a blanket ban by the government so as to ensure continued level playing field between all shops.
Seriously, if it takes this much effort to simply reduce (not even eliminate) plastic bag use, given the far bigger causes of climate destablisation that we need to address, the human race is well and truly screwed!
Detailed analysis of these "new" currently available alternative products by measuring weight of bags, bulk of bags and the transport and storage implications result in frightening statistics for the UK.
If a reduction of 75% of the 13 Billion lightweight bags estimated to be used annually were to be achieved, and an educated estimate based on an examination of the resultant spread of the alternative products purchased is made then the following facts would be the inevitable result
1. The weight of carrier bags would increase from 139,000 tonnes per annum to 413,000 tonnes per annum
2. The weight of transit cardboard and corrugated packaging for carriers would increase from 9,200 tonnes to 34,500 tonnes
3. The bulk of carriers would increase from 362,000 cubic meters per annum to 2.355,708 cubic meters per annum
4. The number of full ( unlikely) pallets thundering through our streets would increase from 996,000 pallets to 6,478,000 pallets per annum.
Furthermore no account is taken in these calculations of all the extra black refuse sacks, swing bin and pedal bin liners, nappy bags, dog dirt bags, sandwich and food bags that would need to be BOUGHT by the public to replace the lightweight bags they currently use. In Eire, where the "plastax " was hailed as a success, the public now cannot buy fresh fruit, vegetable, bakery or deli products without being saddled with polystyrene collation trays or clam shell plastic trays, all of which is between 7 and 12 times as heavy as the small plastic produce bags we use in the UK. Don't be fooled - Eire has a waste mountain as a result of this tax.
In all other spheres of industry, the mantra is to use less resource and lighter products to meet a product demand without compromising on performance. This is EXACTLY what the lightweight supermarket bag does. Use them and reuse them where hygienically possible, recycle them at the over 4,000 collection points in the UK, but understand fully the unintended consequences of our misconceived desire to salve our green conscience by foolishly demonising the lightweight plastic bags - a product which is cheap, raw material efficient, lightweight , waterproof , reusable and 100% recyclable.
The politicians and the pen pushers who expound these theories should do a little simple arithmetic before they catch their spaceship home.
Plastic is simply fantastic.
A concerned Scot.