Nature

4° London Hi 9°C / Lo 3°C

Save the whale (again): Secret plan to lift hunting ban

Twenty years ago, commercial whaling was outlawed. But hush-hush meetings between officials have paved the way for its return

By Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor

Two minke whales are dragged aboard a Japanese whaling ship

AP

Two minke whales are dragged aboard a Japanese whaling ship

Governments are preparing to breach the worldwide whaling ban, legitimising commercial killing of the giant creatures for the first time in more than 20 years.

Key whaling and anti-whaling nations have thrashed out a plan at a series of unpublicised closed-door meetings to allow Japan to kill the leviathans for gain, after outlawing it for two decades. It is to be presented to a special meeting of the official International Whaling Commission (IWC) early next month.

Environmentalists say that the plan amounts to “waving the white flag” to Japan and they fear that it will usher in a new era of legal whaling around the world.

All commercial whaling has been banned since 1986 after the governments who make up the IWC voted by a three-quarters majority for a moratorium on the practice which drove species after species to the brink of extinction.

But Japan has continued to slaughter in the Southern Ocean around Antarctica, by exploiting a loophole in the international law which allows whales to be killed for “scientific” purposes.

Conservationists have harried these annual whale hunts on the high seas with their own ships, but the IWC has been powerless to stop the killing, even though Japan has steadily increased it beyond anything that could be justified for scientific research, and has sold the whale meat for food; this winter it is aiming to catch 935 minke and 50 fin whales.

The international body has remained powerless and deadlocked for decades, and even though both whaling and anti-whaling nations have assiduously recruited other countries to join them, neither side has been able to accumulate enough votes to give it victory under the IWC’s complex decision-making processes.

A year ago, as The Independent on Sunday exclusively reported at the time, the IWC began a series of closed meetings to try to find a compromise.

Since then a working group of 28 nations has met twice – in St Petersburg, Florida, in September and in Cambridge in December – and its leaders have thrashed out a package-deal proposal to put to a meeting of the full commission in Rome in two weeks’ time.

The proposal is so sensitive that the document containing it is officially classified as a “non-paper”, and only two people – the chairmen of the IWC and of the working group – formally take responsibility for it. But sources say it has been thrashed out by Japan and five leading anti-whaling nations, including the United States.

The package would accede to a long-standing Japanese demand by allowing it to hunt minke whales near its coasts for an initial five-year period. It presents two options for dealing with “scientific” whaling – phasing it out over five years or effectively legitimising it – but Japan has already ruled out ending the practice, leaving only legitimisation on the table.

Patrick Ramage, of the International Fund for Animal Welfare, yesterday denounced the plan as “a political fix to give Japan what it wants” and accused conservationist nations of “waving the white flag”.

Mark Simmons, of the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, said that the package amounted to a “de facto lifting of the moratorium”. He feared that other nations would seek similar deals, leading to a worldwide revival of legal whaling.

But Alvaro de Soto, a Peruvian diplomat who chairs the working group, called the package “eminently practical”. He added: “If it is followed it will require compromise, possibly painful, by all concerned, which we profoundly hope they will be willing to make.”

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Saving the Whale, and the IWC!
[info]patrickramage wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 03:28 am (UTC)
A nice piece by Mr. Lean that gets much right. I of course have my own leanings, but to suggest conservation-minded countries have kept pace with the Government of Japan in vote recruitment is to either misunderstand, mislead or both. Certainly the UK, US and other countries are not strangers to exerting pressure on this or that vote in international fora, but Japan's careful cultivation of its bloc at the IWC is unique. (The world waits with bated breath to see how new IWC members Eritrea, Tanzania and Congo will vote at the June annual meeting.) Perhaps instead of straining to produce terms under which commercial whaling can continue, the other eighty-one countries of the IWC should be working to assist, encourage and support Japan, Norway and Iceland, the last three engaged in whaling for commercial purposes, in ending this cruel, unsustainable practice in the 21st century.
The next IWC meeting
[info]miley1434 wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 03:30 am (UTC)
European Parliament moved to ban whaling for scientific purposes and strengthen the current International Whaling Commission (IWC) moratorium on commercial whaling this week.

When he was still a US Senator, President Obama told us: ?Allowing Japan to continue commercial whaling is unacceptable.?

The only problem here Japan's vote buying by giving grands to poor African farm nations to attend to The IWC meetings and vote at Japan's side, that would be real worry, nobody is returning back to commercial whaling, whales are threatened with, baby deaths due to environmental pollution, increasing marine traffic, deafness due to noise pollution that leads collusions with ships, lack of fish and or krill due to ever fishing and climate change.

In addition the stocks that is subjected to this proposal are around 2000 minke whales, Japan targets 1000 whales for its phony research every year. Japan already said no to that.

EU and other anti whaling nations should worry about more how to gain 2/3 majority to stop lethal research on whale indefinitely.

the addition of a good number of 20 new anti-whaling nations to the IWC would solve all the problems, If there is any left my suggestion for anti-whaling nations is to recruit some poor nations to the IWC so that this deadlock can be broken.

Thanks for reading.
Whaling
[info]memburns wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 04:16 am (UTC)
This is disgusting. The only way to stop countries like Japan is to totally bad the killing of whales for any purpose whatsoever. It is a bad day for mankind when money is put before everyother consideration and the 'leaders' of ther world simply give in to 'terroriat' activites of the Japanese.
Saving the Whale
[info]schumi2008 wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 04:24 am (UTC)
Whether or not it is a 'political fix', I think the ban should be lifted and hunting allowed that does not unduly diminish whale stocks
Venus & Mars
[info]royhaines wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 07:48 am (UTC)
How obscene!
We tend to spend thousands of millons to find microbes on mars when we destroy the creation we have in our own house. Not seeing the would for the fees?
We "would" have done something to stop this or that going extinct - BUT - we peferred to look for microbes like us on another planet.
What a sorry lot "humanity" is sometimes.
International arrogance
[info]kosobai wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 07:57 am (UTC)
While not a suporter of whaling myself, I think the crux of the issue is that Japan is exploiting whales as a kind of two-fingered salute towards Western arrogance and preaching. There is a distinct lack of objectivity, as it's an emotive issue, and a lot of hot air is spouted on both sides.

Hunting whales is cruel, but is it any crueller than keeping livestock and poultry in mechanised farming? Lift the ban on whaling, and agree sustainable quotas with Japan and other whaling countries. If they break their agreements, or the catch becomes unsustainable and they refuse to review the quota, put trade tarrifs on Japanese products.

In other words, make Japan responsible for its actions.
Re: International arrogance
[info]adampooler wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 01:43 pm (UTC)
In relation to current animal welfare standards in farming, there are signs that things are improving i.e. the EU-wide ban on battery cages which is due to come into force this year. I hope more regulations like this follow, and that consumers pressurize some of the less ethically minded supermarkets (i.e. Asda, Tesco) into following the lead of the more progressive supermarkets (Waitrose, Co-op) who require their suppliers set higher standards for animal welfare than the legal minimum.

However, the key issue is being able to treat animals humanely: this means doing one's best to avoid causing pain, suffering, and distress. Given that it's absolutely impossible to slaughter a whale without causing a great deal of all of the above, I would say that yes, in general, hunting whales is more cruel than mechanised farming. There is more at stake than the issue of 'sustainability': it really comes down to whether or not we are prepared to let other nations inflict a great deal of suffering on other creatures in pursuit of a food source they do not require.
medievil times
[info]mind_ful wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 08:25 am (UTC)
we have gone back so far in time - witch-hunting decent scientists like Wakefield, and papers like this one attempting to outlaw freedom of choice in medicine, and embracing ludicrous and bestial relgious practices in place of human rights. So why not start whaling again. When will the cock-fights begin?
How incredibly sad
[info]jenniebayliss wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 09:49 am (UTC)
The Japanese like whale meat. They have never wanted to stop eating it and using products sourced from whales. Their Government has continued to support their people in allowing whaling to continue. And yet it also appears that the Government manages to suppress news on this topic, as the ordinary people (I lived there for 2 years) are largely oblivious to what the rest of the world thinks about them for continuing with their practices, nor do they know about the inhumanity of whaling.

I am sadden that this behind the doors deal has been struck, because now Japan has been given the green-light, they will again push to kill more whales (they wanted to kill Humpback for 'scientific' purposes last year) and Norway and some of the other past whaling nations will want the same. What will it take for people around the world to simply leave these beautiful, intelligent creatures to live in peace?
Jennie Bayliss - Weymouth
Whaling
[info]rogerjoselyn wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 11:07 am (UTC)
I was told that Japan only started eating whales during the American blockade that led to Japan entering WW2. It is not a traditional (culturally sensitive) food.
KILLING WHALES
[info]lustyglaze wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 11:23 am (UTC)
It is always difficult to leave behind culturally entrenched practices, even if they are antiquated and in some cases barbaric - e.g cannibalism, fox hunting and seal clubbing. But a return to whaling would be a huge step backwards at a time when we have come to know about the intelligence and value of whales. There is no genuine economic or scientific reason to hunt them. Japan is, I believe, trying to make a point rather than anything else, so here is a challenge for the diplomats, to find a solution that doesn't use whales as bargaining chips. At the same time, we should not lose sight of the fact that whaling is not the only thing killing whales - depletion of fish stocks, pollution, fish farming practices and climate change are factors too, and we all have a degree of power to do something about that.
Sea Shepherd raid
[info]barbara49 wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 01:04 pm (UTC)
My brother who helped on this anti whaling ship says it has been raided today by the Australian Federal police and all their log book info and photos have been taken. Captain Paul Watson is a hero and has dedicated years to trying to alleviate suffering of earths creatures.
We have been given a beautiful planet which is being willfully and cruelly destroyed, please do everything to stop this. See this site.
http://www.seashepherd.org/who-we-are/captain-paul-watson.html
These beautiful creatures must be protected, their suffering is horrible when they are caught and dragged onto the ships.
What is going on that we seem to be appeasing the Japanese, is corruption everywhere?
Will he people going into the meeting be honest?
Return of the ignorant
[info]richarddubs wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 01:09 pm (UTC)
I thought the human race had moved on and this sort of thing was part of our history. We live on a fragile planet and what hope is there of tackling the big green issues if we can't even save the whale.

The planet of on the brink and it would appear that our politicians have caved in at the slightest economic hurdle and put the environment on the back burner.

Come on Brown do something your fool. Where is our leadership and what on earth our politicians doing.

Vote GREEN
Save the Whale
[info]abubbler wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 02:05 pm (UTC)
Is it not about time for a campaign to boycott trade goods from nations who participate in whaling. In this way the countries involved will be obliged to recognise a cost to their industry if they are to proceed.
SAVE THE WHALES AND BOYCOTT THE JAPANESE
[info]leo_argu wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 02:42 pm (UTC)
Japan is a rich country and it doesn't need whale meat to feed their people, it's just a crime to kill these marvelous creatures under the scientific research guise, even some of the members of the international whales club,their countries don't have a sea access so they're no a legitimate vote, Japan will buy their votes given some kind of bribes to get what they want: continue to kill whales.
Leo Arguello
Re: SAVE THE WHALES AND BOYCOTT THE JAPANESE
[info]richard_kefalos wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 04:35 pm (UTC)
I wish someone would torpedo a Japanese whaling ship and send it to the bottom, with crew and all. That would get the Japanese's attention like nothing else, the bastards that they are.
Re: SAVE THE WHALES AND BOYCOTT THE JAPANESE
[info]leo_argu wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 05:38 pm (UTC)
yes they deserve it, japanese need to start educating their children about to save the whales not to kill them, thanks.
Two wrongs make a right No
[info]leonore35 wrote:
Sunday, 22 February 2009 at 03:32 pm (UTC)
Because one thing is bad does not legitamise another bad thing. The cow etc argument is often used but the cow etc have been domesticated and used by humanity for thousands of years. They would and in some cases could not not exist in their present form without human beings.
The whale and dolphin which is also killed by the Japnese are wild animals which have never been domesticated. We protect all kinds of animals and insects as well as plants, this is no differnt
Many scientists are studying whales in the wild as it is not practical to keep them captive, only the Japanese find it necessary to kill large numbers of them
The number of people in Japan who want to eat whale meat is not a large percentage of the pop.
They consume huge quantities of fish as it is, they don't need meat from whales
Re: Two wrongs make a right No
[info]schumi2008 wrote:
Monday, 23 February 2009 at 09:58 am (UTC)
So are you saying that it is OK to kill a species that you have domesticated but not OK to kill a species you have not domesticated? I cannot see how 'being domesticated' is the basis for a moral argument. Fish are not domesticated, yet they are killed and nobody complains. If 'being domesticated' was the basis for your oppostion to whaling then it would be logical to also be against fishing. The last sentance is irrelevant. I think the Japanese can decide wheter or not they want to eat whale or need to eat whale. Are you also against indigenous people fishing as part of their tribal custom? You must be, for their fish also are not domesticated!
SAVE THE WHALES AND BOYCOTT THE JAPANESE
[info]leo_argu wrote:
Monday, 23 February 2009 at 01:55 am (UTC)
I did some digging and i remember that I've been fighting the international whaling commission, that is in the UK, this is the place to call and whom is in charge of all this fiasco:The International Whaling Commission
The Red House,
135 Station Road,
Impington,
Cambridge,
Cambridgeshire CB24 9NP, UK.

Tel: +44 (0) 1223 233 971
Fax: +44 (0) 1223 232 876
so send a fax or call him and let him know that he will be ashame of all this killing...
Ban whaling or boycott Japan
[info]rowdy74 wrote:
Monday, 23 February 2009 at 01:00 pm (UTC)
A return to commercial whaling is the most disgusting act our planet can enact on nature. After all Japans phoney years of 'researching' whaling and how to kill whales humanely they still cant do it. The deaths of these huge animals is slow and tortured and says a lot about the world if we allow its return. I for one will boycott anything and everything made in Japan or any other whaling nation if commercial whaling returns. I cant even describe how angry i feel at this. A return to this form of utter barbarism is unbelievable. Next the Japanese will want endangered tigers on the menu for cultural reasons. Whaling is wrong, pure and simple, and shame on any politician or nation that gives in to Japans demands
Whaling by Japan
[info]whalesaviors wrote:
Monday, 23 February 2009 at 05:19 pm (UTC)
How is it that humans can be so intelligent yet so morally corrupt? Perhaps it is time to lift the ban on hunting humans. That would accomplish many things. Imagine an end to hunger, sustainable resources for the remaining populations. The planet earth could once again find it's balance. Perhaps the first groups of humans we should hunt down should be the morally corrupt. I'll help write a list. Simple solution, but humans consider themselves worthy of being stewards of this planet. I contend that we are not and if there is a god in heaven, he should destroy us all immediately.
Moral Values
[info]whalesaviors wrote:
Monday, 23 February 2009 at 05:25 pm (UTC)
Maslow was right. There are people that have not evolved along with the rest of us.
[info]americanlass wrote:
Monday, 23 February 2009 at 05:30 pm (UTC)
Disgusting and pathetic, Japan. We all know what happens when governments roll over and let other nations do exactly what they want. The earth's ecosystems cannot afford yet more unbalancing by killing its largest creatures, "in the name of science". Pah.
hunting humans
[info]leo_argu wrote:
Tuesday, 24 February 2009 at 12:00 am (UTC)
whalesaviors
good idea, first go to island of japan and hunt the complete float of the maru ship that specialize in killing whales after just choose whatever you want there's plenty, bankers barons , automotive honchos, madoffs, stanfords and alike,Cranford texan rancher (bush) and all corrupted politicians in the world, you have my support...
Damn the Japanese
[info]billylad wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 12:08 pm (UTC)
I support the Environmental Investigation Agency that does much to conserve vanishing and endangered species and suggested they consider launching an attempt to boycott Japanese products. I can't see any other way of making them reconsider this disgusting and utterly indefensible behaviour. EIA rejected the idea out of hand.
Killing WHales
[info]whale_gurl wrote:
Thursday, 26 February 2009 at 07:18 am (UTC)
What good does it do to give in to the Japanese. It is brutal, and barbaric and personally distressing.

My company, Blue Waters Kayaking, takes people to see the Gray Whales where the are born in Baja, Mexico. We can definitely see the intelligence and trust in the the Gray Whales. These whales show more humanity than some humans. We could all learn from these gentle beings.

Don't give in to the Japanese!
saving the whales
[info]leo_argu wrote:
Friday, 27 February 2009 at 03:50 am (UTC)
i don't know how long it'll take to fight this against the hedonistic barbaric society of japan, to get them know that killing whales is inhumane and completely disrespectful of the rest of the humanity, while in california they have trips to encounter this beautiful creatures and south of baja california are sanctuary s to the whales, this insatiable country is taking all the whales that they can get, who in the world give this nation to kill whatever they want, the ocean already is in the brinks of some species extinction, japan has one of the mos efficient fish predatory float in the world, they think that they just can fish whatever they want, nobody will confront them, what a shame not only in humanity but in pride of our nations, as i see we're at mercy of the most hedonistic unethical society i remember...

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date