These are contradictory times for cinemagoing in the UK. For cinema-owners, optimism and extreme anxiety seem to go hand in hand. Box-office appears to be booming. For three years in a row, the Brits have broken the £1bn barrier in takings. Cinema admissions in Britain stand at about 170 million a year – in comparison with the 54 million admissions that we mustered in 1984. There are almost 4,000 screens in the country. The 3D boom prompted by James Cameron's Avatar in 2009 gave cinema-owners a windfall and helped finance the transition to digital.
The audience base has been expanding, too. Partially thanks to films such as The King's Speech and The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel, older (over 45) spectators are going to the movies in increasing numbers and now make up 30 per cent of the overall cinema-going audience.
Scrape beneath the surface gloss, however, and some worrying trends quickly become apparent. As David Puttnam recently noted, unemployment among 16- to 24-year-olds in the UK broke one million for the first time last year. "This amounts to one in five of that age group, traditionally the most frequent cinemagoers."
At the same time, the cost of cinema tickets has continued to rise. There is a growing threat that a new generation of young adults simply won't be able to afford to go to the cinema.
Another question is whether the young audience will still want to go to the cinema when there are so many other ways of watching films.
It is hard to credit now that cinemas used to be the only places where you could see movies. At a British Screen Advisory Council (BSAC) conference in London last month, attendees were told by an industry analyst that in this brave new digital age, there are nowabout 16 different ways in which films are watched by British movie enthusiasts. These range from the gigantic IMAX screen to the tiny portable device. In spite of continual predictions of its imminent demise, the DVD market remains resilient, albeit that Blu-ray has proved a disappointment. It has become far easier than before to stream films online. With broadband speed and digital technology improving all the time, the idea of having a cinematic experience in your front room no longer seems far fetched.
Cinema attendance has remained static. The increased box-office revenues trumpeted by trade bodies each year come largely from the rise in ticket prices. Exhibitors have used 3D to justify putting a hefty surcharge on tickets. Now, even if a film isn't being screened in 3D, there's a fair chance that spectators will still be invited to pay extra to see it with enhanced seating and sound.
No one really knows whether 3D will retain its popularity with British cinema audiences. In 2011, there were hints that these cinemagoers were either falling out of love with the format – or growing exasperated at having to pay extra to watch 3D movies. While several 3D movies nestled near the top of the box-office lists for 2011, their overall share of the market declined. There were 45 3D films released in 2011, generating £235.8m; this doesn't compare favourably with the £241.8m generated by 28 3D releases in 2010.
It will be revealing to see how British audiences react to a big-budget, character-driven, "literary" 3D movie such as Baz Luhrmann's adaptation of The Great Gatsby (released later this year). Cinemagoers who are willing to pay extra to watch James Cameron-style spectacle may balk at having to spend those extra pounds to watch Jay Gatsby and Daisy Buchanan make mooncalf eyes at one another.
In spite of the huge technological changes in film-making and film distribution, the British film industry is still run along surprisingly traditional lines. One principle that remains sacrosanct to the US studios and their British offshoots is "windows". This is the idea that films will travel in an orderly way, at staggered intervals, from the cinema to DVD, then on to pay-TV (or VoD) before turning up on free TV. Whatever the risk of piracy or audience fatigue at being made to wait to see movies, many cinema-owners cling doggedly to the old way of doing business.
One British distributor who rejects the idea of staggered releases is Philip Knatchbull, CEO of the Curzon Group. As Curzon owns its own cinemas, Knatchbull doesn't need to worry about upsetting exhibitors. He doesn't distinguish between releasing films in Curzon's London cinemas or making them available at the same time to anyone who wants to download them on Curzon's "home cinema" platforms. The cost is roughly the same. The cinemas themselves he describes as "shop windows" and "entertainment venues".
Should the exhibitors be worried that their core audience is about to vanish? Mark Batey, Chief-Executive of the Film Distributors' Association, argues that cinema in our age of austerity remains "affordable escapism" for even cash-strapped younger filmgoers. Others are not so optimistic. They fear that if there isn't some flexibility with ticket prices and windows, much of the core audience may soon be lost.