Why Jude Law’s Henry VIII is a Tudor king for the #MeToo era
As the actor’s performance in ‘Firebrand’ has drawn plaudits at Cannes, Geoffrey Macnab looks at how Henry VIII has been represented in films
Jude Law’s enormous bottom was the talk of the Cannes Crosiette last weekend. Following the premiere of Firebrand, Karim Aïnouz’s new costume drama in which Law plays Henry VIII opposite Alicia Vikander as the Tudor monarch’s sixth and last wife Katherine Parr, critics expressed their astonishment at the voluminous size of Law’s rump.
Reviews have carried reference to the “ham hock prosthetics”, which must have been used to turn the actor’s backside – seen fleetingly during one of the King’s animalistic trysts with the unfortunate Katherine – into the equivalent of the “giant, shaved arse of a sheep”, as The Guardian called it.
Not since Philip Seymour Hoffman’s posterior was similarly exposed in the sex scene which opens Sidney Lumet’s Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead (2007) has an A-list male actor looked quite so grotesque. Lumet’s movie was a contemporary crime drama set in New York in which Seymour Hoffman was playing a crooked financier. It was a long way removed from the court of Henry VIII, but the two movies have more in common than you imagine. Both are about family betrayal and show masculinity at its basest.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies