Ready to Wear: "Winslet has lost some weight and if that makes her happy then good for her"
If ever proof were needed that we love to hate our icons it comes in the form of the suggestion that Kate Winslet's fan base might be alienated by the fact that she is photographed, nearly naked and, more importantly, ultra-slender on the front cover of this month's 'Vanity Fair'. The star's image has not been "air-brushed" her people claim (true, obviously – it's all done digitally these days) although a certain amount of "colour correction" may have been involved.
Given that Winslet has, in the past, objected to her photograph being manipulated in glossy magazines – notably 'GQ' where her body was stretched almost beyond recognition – perhaps any adverse reaction isn't so surprising. It is, however, thoroughly naive to expect any actress – or indeed actor – not to want to appear as gorgeous if not better than nature intended in a styled, conceptually motivated shoot. Is it okay that Winslet is wearing make-up in these pictures? Or that her hair is bigger than Barbarella's? Both are entirely her prerogative, of course, and, in the circles she moves in, no more than a question of human rights, as much a part of every-day requirements as hiring a naturopath/personal trainer/dietician.
In fact, people's mistrust of so-called photographic manipulation is almost as misunderstood and more out of control than, well, the photo manipulation itself. The old adage that the camera never lies is outdated, after all. It is not only the set up of the picture – hair, make-up, lighting and so forth – that is orchestrated but also the choice of lens, level of exposure, position of the photographer that will influence the end result as much, and often far more, than any work done post production.
Winslet has lost some weight and if that makes her happy then good for her. These pictures are a performance – the reference is Catherine Deneuve in the film 'Belle de Jour' apparently. The photographer is Steven Meisel, far from famous for his naturalistic representation of women. Instead, Meisel has made a career out of transporting anyone interested enough to look at his work to a preternaturally beautiful place. Neither the man himself nor anyone he works with would argue with that.
In the end, any disapproval springs from a peculiarly British mindset that dictates that vanity must be punished at all costs. Sackcloth and ashes, anyone? Failing that, those offended by the sight of a talented and lovely looking woman at the height of her power might simply resist buying the magazine instead.
Life & Style blogs
Who is Teresa Fidalgo? Debunking the fake ghost story that's got Instagram spooked
Google taken to court by ex-banker to remove defamatory material
Regin: Newly uncovered malicious software snooping since 2008 'was developed by a nation state'
Kim Kardashian recreates iconic Jean-Paul Goude naked 'Champagne Incident' photo
Henri de Toulouse Lautrec: Google celebrates 150th anniversary of French artist's birth
- 1 Lego letter from the 1970s still offers a powerful message to parents 40 years later
- 2 To help fuel their propaganda machine against the poor, our government has now decided to redefine the word 'welfare'
- 3 Naked free runner captured in breathtaking photographs above London's streets
- 4 Woman opens professional cuddling shop – gets 10,000 customers in first week
- 5 Grayson Perry: London needs affordable housing because 'rich people don't create culture'
£30000 - £60000 per annum + Excellent: Austen Lloyd: Employment Solicitor - Ke...
Negotiable: Argyll Scott International: Hi All, I'm currently recruiting for t...
Highly Competitive Salary: Austen Lloyd: HAMPSHIRE MARKET TOWN - A highly attr...
£23000 - £30000 per annum + pension, 25days holiday: Ashdown Group: An industr...