Fashion

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 14° London Hi 15°C / Lo 8°C

Size-zero hero: Fashion's high priestess calls time on 'size zero'

'Vogue' admits to retouching photos as editor calls on world designers to stop producing clothes that even the skinniest models can't get into

By Susie Mesure

It is the ultimate "size zero" backlash. The editor of Vogue has lambasted the world's top designers for making their clothes too tight for even the skinniest models.

In a letter sent to the biggest names in fashion, from Prada to Chanel, Alexandra Shulman has blamed fashion houses for forcing fashion magazines to find unrealistically tiny models to squeeze into their designs. Photos of models with "no breasts or hips" encourage eating disorders, which affect more than a million people in Britain, campaigners believe.

Her letter to designers from Stella McCartney and John Galliano to Karl Lagerfeld and Alexander McQueen comes as new designers are being urged to "recast the beauty ideal" by designing catwalk clothes that might actually fit real women. For the first time, this autumn's London Fashion Week will feature an event celebrating all shapes and sizes, rather than the "size zeros" that prevail in a typical catwalk show.

The British Fashion Council, which organises the capital's biannual fashion extravaganza, is backing the initiative from Beat, Britain's leading eating disorder charity, which will showcase curvier, older models than the likes of such skinny catwalk superstars as Agyness Deyn and Lily Cole. "It will celebrate and represent a range of body shapes and sizes," said Caroline Rush, the BFC's joint chief executive.

Caryn Franklin, a fashion writer and broadcaster who is working with Beat on the event, said: "It's about expanding the imagery that comes out of LFW so that women can for once see themselves mirrored [in the catwalk photos]."

The supermodel Erin O'Connor, who is deputy chairman of LFW, is also working with Beat on the event. She backed Ms Shulman's call for designers to rethink their sizing, fashion's dark secret that lies at the heart of the "size zero" furore, which has claimed the lives of several models who starved themselves to shoehorn their bodies into tiny catwalk designs. Ms Franklin added: "It's fantastic that Alex, from her position of power and respect, is saying that even Vogue has had enough."

Ms Shulman's letter pointed out that Vogue frequently had to retouch photographs to make models look larger – the opposite of the sort of vanity airbrushing that usually goes on at magazines. It is the first time that a fashion magazine has ever locked horns with designers over their skimpy sizes.

Ms Rush added: "We are pleased that Vogue has chosen to highlight issues of sample sizing and identify their readers' concerns for model health and the photographic representation of fashion."

Although designers claim their samples are sized 8 to 10, fashion insiders admit that these bear no resemblance to anything you might find hanging on the size 8 or 10 hangers at a high street retailer.

Even some of the hottest newer models, such as Daisy Lowe, are too big for most sample sizes.

So far, no designer has responded publicly to the Vogue editor's letter, which was sent at the end of last month. Instead, designers have defended their sizing as "perfectly reasonable", according to Ms Shulman.

But for Beat's LFW event, which will be held at Somerset House in September, designers will have to cut their clothes more generously. Susan Ringwood, chief executive of Beat, said: "We want to encourage the fashion industry to show diversity and to challenge the aesthetic. The beauty ideal needs to be recast. It's not about being very tall or very thin."

It is the first time that the eating disorder charity will be involved with an event at London Fashion Week.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]joanking wrote:
Sunday, 14 June 2009 at 06:46 am (UTC)
Thin Girls are beautiful. Fat girls are ugly. Personally, I think fat girls shouldn't be a model. The model industry is not a charity, why should they be made responsible and try to make fat women feel better about themselves?
Fashion models all sizes available
[info]millytant wrote:
Monday, 15 June 2009 at 01:01 pm (UTC)
Although models traditionally show off swimwear and beachwear and don't really want to become known as "the whale" I feel that the above sweeping statement is a little harsh.
[info]ceekerr wrote:
Sunday, 14 June 2009 at 12:07 pm (UTC)
It isn't about thin girls vs fat girls, it's about healthy women and not just appearance-wise but medically healthy. Surely it is a sign that the situation of models within the fashion industry has become somewhat skewed if even a respected figure of this industry has now come forward saying that even the skinniest of models can no longer fit into sample sizes. I am not so naive as think that magazines should never and will never touch up photographs but I doubt that it was ever common practice for them to make their models look bigger.

Of course, women come in all shapes and sizes including the naturally tall and thin but that is different from unnaturally jutting, protruding bones.
Sky news.You comment and .column shows three comments .Page expands. And it does for thirty-five min
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 14 June 2009 at 05:11 pm (UTC)
I give up, just give up. This women only bone no one to mate her appeared in Australia. I have her, Australia: Miss Universe runner-up Stephanie Naumoska re-ignites ...
24 Apr 2009 ... The appearance of a super skinny contestant in Australia's Miss Universe pageant has re-ignited the debate over size zero models
Latest News
The pattern of burn marks on her bones showed that after she died, ... As he sees it, there was no later migration and replacement "Only one species of human .... Mungo Man also appeared to mock the findings of previous scientists: His mtDNA ... wolves and coyotes, dromedaries and Bactrian camels also cross-mate. ...
21 Sep 2006 ... This is the young model who died at a catwalk show after days without eating. Her death, during Uruguay's fashion week, led to the ban on ...
I am sorry I just lost my eggs on toast and am looking for these. With any luck by the ants, I will come back eat them.
I saw this in the Sky news. I hate one thing. Not just the nudes no shapes but the comments column. You comment and go back after some time to see if your comments the comment column shows three comments and there is a small line .. Page expands. And it does for thirty-five minutes and you do not see your comment that was one line. Boy these models and SKY get me at times. Other ting I see is the fat lady who talks about the Vogue magazines and these zero and 1111 the bits and bytes cannot come. I agree they are not worth to hyenas but the lady Ms Shulman says. Ironically, the highly respected fashion editor also revealed that some cover images only show faces - not the clothes - because readers are "uncomfortable". I swear I am very interested. My fish can play with them.
The Times has now published parts of the lambasting letter, which was not intended for publication, from Ms Shulman about so-called size-zero models.
"During the time I have been at Vogue the sample sizes that models are required to wear have become substantially smaller," she wrote in the missive.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Vogue-Editor-Alexandra-Shulman-Complains-To-Fashion-Designers-Size-Zero-Samples-And-Skinny-Models/Article/200906215303592?lpos=UK_News_Third_Home_Page_Feature_Teaser_Region_0&lid=ARTICLE_15303592_Vogue_Editor_Alexandra_Shulman_Complains_To_Fashion_Designers%3A_Size-Zero_Samples_And_Skinny_Models#comment
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla


[info]moddy888 wrote:
Sunday, 14 June 2009 at 06:11 pm (UTC)
It is hilarious that in an era where people are growing up bigger and bigger due to better nutrition and health, that the ideal woman according to designers is stick-thin. I find myself wondering how the actual styles of fashion might change if designers would design for more normally-shaped women. I wish the focus could be on Fit vs Unfit rather than Thin vs. Fat.
Why choosing size 0 model in the first place?
[info]shaunhng wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 01:07 pm (UTC)
If Vogue are so concern about the image of size 0 models.... why do they choose to use size 0 model in the first place and then complain about their size and retouching them?

They could easily used a bigger model and ask for a bigger size from the designers.... instead of just blaming them.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date