Food & Drink

Rain (AM and PM) 3° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Store renames fish to spare embarrassment

By Martin Hickman, Consumer affairs correspondent

A handout photo issued by Sainsbury's of Red or Dead founder Wayne Hemingway with a limited edition packaged pollack

A handout photo issued by Sainsbury's of Red or Dead founder Wayne Hemingway with a limited edition packaged pollack

Sainsbury's has renamed Pollack as Colin because, it said, potential buyers were too embarrassed to ask for pollack, a cheap and plentiful cod substitute. After a marketing revamp by the designer Wayne Hemingway, and extensive market research, Sainsbury's hopes colin will revitalise the market for the fish.

Colin is to be pronounced "colan", after the French term for cooked pollack. France buys 70 per cent of stocks from British waters. Packs of fish, in new packaging, will go on sale in 10 stores to determine whether the rebranding will appeal. "It seems daft that pollack isn't more popular, particularly when it's readily available off our own coast, tastes great and is cheaper than cod," said Hemingway, founder of the Red or Dead fashion brand.

"Image really is everything; so to help colin stand out on-shelf we've used bold, bright colours and a design that is cheekily inspired by another well-known 'Pollock' [the artist Jackson Pollock]. The new-look colin sleeve will be the star of the Sainsbury's store; we expect coach-loads to travel by land and sea to see it."

If this works, other little-eaten fish that could be renamed include gurnard (Derek?), ling (Timothy?), saithe (Jilly?) and flounder (Bert?).

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

This story should have gone out on April 1st!
[info]fourpie wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 04:47 am (UTC)
This is almost beyond belief. I now need something to restore my faith in human capabilities!
[info]northwest0161 wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 05:36 am (UTC)
These are the kind of people who end up shooting their family and burning down their house rather than face up to the fact they are in financial difficulties. How ridiculous.
[info]fenham wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 06:13 am (UTC)
what a load of cobblers!
Why would anyone be ashamed of buying fish?
Someone @ Sainsbury's has way too much time on their hands if this is the result of being paid to think
april is reallly here
[info]orangiey wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 06:14 am (UTC)
and the word colan is similar to...??
Fish Names
[info]peteaholbrook wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 06:45 am (UTC)
Wouldn't a better name for the Flounder be a 'Gordon' ?
Re: Fish Names
[info]the_kegs wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 07:08 am (UTC)
Nice one!
The all powerful supermarkets
[info]jeanshaw wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 06:59 am (UTC)
What with Tescos banning sheepdogs from herding sheep and now this it is clear that supermarkets believe they can do what they like .
Pollacks
[info]the_kegs wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 07:07 am (UTC)
What an absolute load of pollacks.
What a relief!
[info]acidpen wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 07:10 am (UTC)
well actually last week i did fancy the fish formerly known as Pollack...but i just couldn't bring myself to ask for it, i don't know! i guess i was just to ashamed to say Pollack, its such a relief that now i can ask for a nice piece of tasty colon for my supper! Thank you Sainsburys!

While we are on the subject... you don't think you could change the name of fagots do you? they also look very tasty but i just don't have the confidence to be seen with fagots at the check out, whatever would the neighbors think?!

And maybe whole your at it, you could change your slogan to "we've gone fu*king nuts at sainsburys"
What's wrong with good old poll@ck
[info]veomar wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 07:32 am (UTC)
Nothing. I'll continue asking for poll[o/a]ck.
rename of fish
[info]beeston1 wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 07:36 am (UTC)
Another good free advertising stunt from Sainsbury's. Pollock has always been called pollock and I am not embarrassed to say the word. There is no way I would go and ask for a pound of "colan" it sound like a body part - how disgusting. Who ever thought this one up should give Sainsbury's customers more respect.
There's nothing wrong with poll@ck
[info]veomar wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 07:36 am (UTC)
Pollocks! I'll continue asking for it by its proper name.
Store remanes fish
[info]arbutwarrif wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 08:24 am (UTC)
What nonsense.
Oh dear
[info]jinglebunny wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 09:25 am (UTC)
After reading this story, I'm not sure I could stand the humiliation of admitting to neighbours that I've ever shopped at S--------'-.

Maybe they could change the company name to spare me embarrassment.
Rename it "Moronic PR-crazy Tw*ts PLC", or something similarly inoffensive.
POLLACKS TO THE FRENCH
[info]dkayedon wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 09:30 am (UTC)
JUST BECAUSE THEY CAN COOK BETTER AND PROBABLY LIVE BETTER THEN US BRITS. WE NOW HAVE TO SAY "COLAN/COLIN TO THE FRENCH.

HOW DAFT CAN STORES GET

"POUND OF POLLACKS PLEASE"
It's just good old-fashioned, British COLEY
[info]2barrows wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 09:44 am (UTC)
It is also called Coley but that obviously that doesn't have same exotic undertones as Colin. Traditionally, coley is what the cat got. Remember that, when Sainsburys try to charge more for it.
Re: It's just good old-fashioned, British COLEY
[info]edinburghemma wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 10:25 am (UTC)
eeee, I remember the days when I oft bought coley in Safeways. Huzzah I shall again. Just for the thrill of saying pollocks aloud in public.Pollock! Sainsburys suck the proverbial and no mistake.
No it isn't
[info]jinglebunny wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 10:30 am (UTC)
Coley or saithe (lieu noir, in French), hake (merlu / colin) and pollack (lieu jaune) are all similar members of the cod (morue) family. But they are different (check them out on the fishmonger's slab), and they do taste different.

S--------'- have made plonkers of themselves.

Not only is their argument spurious, but they've nicked the wrong French word. Serves them right for hiring a wanky trendmonger to repackage a perfectly good product instead of educating their customers.

Of course, that wouldn't be a cool thing to do, and they wouldn't have any "business justification" for putting the price up, would they.

They're pathetic, and I'll be damned if they get any business from me in future.
PC gone mad again
[info]mike_spain wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 12:00 pm (UTC)
What a load of Pollacks !
Spelling
[info]gary2057 wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 12:07 pm (UTC)
Now I thought they were called "Pollock" ,
not Pollack as wrtten in article !
Maybe this was for political correctness..............
Fishy
[info]over325one wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 12:32 pm (UTC)
You lose faith in both retailers and consumers. Too timid or snobby to ask for Polack. The mind actually boggles at these people.
[info]nedsky wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 01:28 pm (UTC)
Is Wayne Hemingway a character out of Private Eye's "It's grim up North London"?

It's time he was renamed and repackaged.
Nice one!
[info]westbrit wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 01:31 pm (UTC)
You missed April Fool's by almost a week...LOL
Call cigarettes vaginas
[info]prof_use wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 01:32 pm (UTC)
Aren't marketing people fantastic to come out with something like this. Only in England is the embarrassment factor liable to be so influential. If we apply this logic to other products we could instantly become a healthier nation. We could call cigarettes vaginas, a cigar a penis and in one fell swoop we will cut down tobacco purchases. Which respectable old codger would go into a shop and ask for "a large old Havanna penis please"?

And if we called condoms lollipops we could reduce the spread of HIV. "Anything for the weekend sir?"
"A packet of lollipops please"

Why do people continue to buy cod? Have they not heard of the embarrassing cod-piece?
[info]nedsky wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 01:41 pm (UTC)
In Germany the fish is called "Seelachs" (=sea salmon) and is immensely popular.

Renaming fish to make it seem more palatable isn't new. Dogfish became huss became rock salmon.

But calling a fish colin is just plain stupid.
What prats marketeers are
[info]lush_laroo wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 03:17 pm (UTC)
What complete and utter cr*p
I love pollack but would never buy from Sainsbury's
It just goes to show how stupid these marketing idiots are but come on the Sainsbury's managers are fools to go with it
Renaming Fish
[info]abubbler wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 03:39 pm (UTC)
What a load of pollack! If Sainsburys want to rename a fish Colin why not use a more imaginative name - like Denzil!
Just ask for Colin
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 04:50 pm (UTC)
"Colin" is even more embarrassing than "Bollocks"..er..." Pollack. Imagine the scene at the fish counter:

"Have you got Colin in today?"
"Yes, he's in on Fridays"
"Is he ready gutted?"
pollack
[info]angusogg wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 05:42 pm (UTC)
the other proper name is Lyth. excellent fish but the secret is to freeze it first to firm up the flesh.
Wayne Hemingway
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 05:49 pm (UTC)
Is there anything Wayne Hemingway won't stick his nose into? When is he going to be out of our faces?
pollack
[info]eligius wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 06:23 pm (UTC)
When will this lunacy end! How utterly ridiculous to rename a fish because asking for it in Sainsbury's might cause embarrassment. I should think the only embarrassment should be felt by Sainsbury's themselves for this piece of idiocy.
yeah and Zanulabour will.......
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 06:36 pm (UTC)
........... rename income tax as a happiness payment. oh Orwell where are you when we need you?
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 06:39 pm (UTC)
couldn't flounder be renamed Gordon?
[info]nyamuzihwa wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 07:12 pm (UTC)
What a plethora of inane drivel ! We don't need this kind of nonsense during a recession.
What's in a name
[info]hannah_stones wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 07:23 pm (UTC)
What utter stupidity! It takes a certain mentality of person to be concerned about the name of a 'bone fide' product. Presumably this will keep the 'moronic' none intellectual members of our society relatively happy - and prevent them from sniggering when ordering or selecting this perfectly good and nutritious fish when shopping. Are these the same people who may refuse to discuss planets such as Uranus, even if they had astronomical knowledge?

Do please remember that the Dogfish was renamed Rock Salmon (possibly because they were upset at eating a canine) and following the complaints made regarding the fact that the Dogfish was not in any way connected to the salmon genus - it was renamed yet again.

Possibly those that eat pouisson in a restaurant are concerned about a toxic chicken? Why do we constantly have to pander to dimwitted people? The world is full of them. Still it provides humour to those with a grain of intelligence who have the knowledge to be able to note the difference between a paedophile and a paediatrician!
Pollock/ bollocks
[info]awestbere wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 11:26 pm (UTC)
Is the average British consumer daft, that such a good eating fish has to be renamed just because the marketing guys think it will sell. Such lack of maturity with shoppers. Stick with your beer and curries you Brits
and let those who enjoy pollock as plain pollock. What next ,call something muriel? Remember if you mis pronounce Colan wrong you get people asking for Colon! A. Westbere
And how much is all that flashy packaging going to cost?
[info]davkt wrote:
Tuesday, 7 April 2009 at 07:39 am (UTC)
Funniest thing I've read since the Tesco sheep dog story! But how much is all that fancy packaging going to a) cost at the checkout and b) if pollock suddenly becomes the nation's favorite fish add to landfill?
I fail to see...
[info]sickofstupidity wrote:
Tuesday, 7 April 2009 at 03:49 pm (UTC)
I fail to see how renaming a fish whose old name, admittedly, sounds a little too close to 'bollock', to a new name whose sound and spelling is rather similar to 'colon', can make it more appetizing to consumers.

I mean - Anus or testicle? You decide!

And how much, pray, did Sainsbury's spend on this utterly pointless and stupid piece of market research? Marketing psychology like this is clearly a load of Pollacks, and clearly shows that those who subscribe to it must have their heads shoved firmly up their Colins!
[info]franchise999 wrote:
Tuesday, 16 June 2009 at 02:03 pm (UTC)
old but funny story from this Food Franchise

Tuck into our A-to-Z of recipes

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date