Micah L. Sifry: Lessons on social media from America

On his first full day in office, U.S. President Barack Obama issued an executive memorandum that may someday be seen as signaling the most important shift in how government works in America since the rise of the New Deal.

His subject? Not jobs or health care or the environment, but transparency and open government. In five succinct paragraphs, he promised to create an “unprecedented level of openness in government”, arguing that it would: “strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in government.”

Most significantly, and in what can only be understood as an explicit tip-of-the-hat to Web 2.0 thinking, he declared that in addition to making government more transparent, it should become more participatory and collaborative:

“Public engagement enhances the government’s effectiveness and improves the quality of its decisions. Knowledge is widely dispersed in society, and public officials benefit from having access to that dispersed knowledge. Executive departments and agencies should offer Americans increased opportunities to participate in policymaking and to provide their government with the benefits of their collective expertise and information… Executive departments and agencies should use innovative tools, methods, and systems to cooperate among themselves, across all levels of government, and with nonprofit organizations, businesses, and individuals in the private sector.”

The language is dry but the message is clear: It is time to replace Big Government and know-it-all bureaucracy with a more inclusive and porous kind of collaborative governance. Could Obama be calling for the federal government to embrace the wisdom of crowds? Signs abound.

First there were the experiments undertaken by his transition team during the weeks after the election and before the inauguration. On Change.gov, the official transition website, visitors were invited to ‘Join the Discussion’ on topics like healthcare reform, the economy, and community service, and rate the comments made by others. Several thousand people participated. Then the transition team launched ‘Open for Discussion’, a gigantic open forum where people were invited to post questions and vote the best ones to the top. Over the course of two rounds, more than 120,000 people voted nearly six million times on more than 85,000 questions. In both cases, top administration officials offered answers to the top-voted issues. Finally, there was the ‘Citizens’ Briefing Book’, an attempt at making sure that at least some iconoclastic ideas from the public made their way directly and unfiltered into the President’s hands. More than 125,000 people voted on more than 44,000 submissions, and several months later, the White House Office of Public Engagement released a 32-page .pdf along with a video showing Obama holding the report.

Then there were Obama’s own declarations about how his approach to government, and in particular the giant spending plan for economic recovery, the major legislative priority of his first months in office, would be informed by direct public participation in the process. In one online video, he told his supporters that this program would be conducted “with unprecedented transparency and accountability”. Clearly aware that his critics were already predicting that Big Government would waste hundreds of billions in taxpayer dollars, he added:

“I’ll appoint an aggressive Inspector General and a cabinet level oversight board to make sure your money is spent wisely. More importantly, I’ll enlist all of you. As soon as this plan is signed into law, Recovery.gov goes live and you’ll be able to see precisely where your tax dollars are going. Because this is your democracy, and as I said throughout the campaign, change never begins from the top down. It begins from the bottom up.”

A day later, selling his recovery plan at a town-hall meeting in economically devastated Elkhart, Indiana, he went further in explaining his vision for crowdsourcing the watchdogging of government spending:

“We’re actually going to set up something called Recovery.gov – this is going to be a special website we set up, that gives you a report on where the money is going in your community, how it’s being spent, how many jobs are being created so that all of you can be the eyes and ears. And if you see that a project is not working the way it’s supposed to, you’ll be able to get on that website and say, ‘You know, I thought this was supposed to be going to school construction but I haven’t noticed any changes being made’. And that will help us track how this money is being spent... The key is that we’re going to have strong oversight and strong transparency to make sure this money isn’t being wasted.”

“I’ll enlist all of you.” “You can be the eyes and ears.” These are the words of someone who clearly understands the power and wisdom of a crowd, and the axiom that all of us are smarter than any one of us.

But it’s one thing for the President to issue memoranda and make statements about involving the public in a fundamentally new way in their government, and another to get government agencies and leaders to actually change how they do business. So far, the implementation of Obama’s vision remains sketchy at best. Recovery.gov, which is meant to play a central role in collecting, displaying and tracking how billions in new monies are spent, is so far just a placeholder of a website. The Inspector General in charge of that program admits it will take at least until the fall before the site contains much detailed information, and no one is really sure whether it will actually enable visitors to look up information as granular as a specific school construction project or report a subcontractor for failing to deliver promised services or jobs.

In terms of involving the public in a meaningful discussion of policy priorities, the Obama administration has clearly chosen to crawl before it walks, let alone runs.

Echoing the experiments on Change.gov, the Recovery.gov office did ask the public for suggestions on how best to structure its data-gathering systems, and it crowdsourced the prioritisation of those comments. More recently, the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Science and Technology Policy have embarked on a more ambitious ‘open government initiative’, inviting the public to brainstorm recommendations on how to implement Obama’s day – one transparency memorandum. The goal, in the words of Beth Noveck, the deputy chief technology officer for open government, is to create a structured dialogue aimed at the ‘co-creation of government’ with ‘many people participating in the process’. After a week of open consultation, just over 2,000 people had posted about 900 ideas, thousands of comments, and cast 33,000 votes to help rank them. In later stages of the initiative, government experts were slated to lead an in-depth conversation on the WhiteHouse.gov blog about the top suggestions, and then detailed recommendations were to be drafted using a wiki editing platform.

In late March, the White House press office also took at least one big step towards a more interactive approach to the public, holding an ‘online townhall’ on the economy, where for two days anyone could post a question or vote one to the top of the pile. Then Obama held a live webcast from the White House where he pointedly responded to most of the top-voted questions. Nearly 93,000 people submitted more than a hundred thousand questions, and more than 3.6 million votes were cast on them. The event was generally deemed a success, but it hit one discordant note when Obama made fun of the fact that questions about legalising marijuana did surprisingly well in the online voting. “I don’t know what this says about the online audience”, he chuckled, ignoring the fact that somewhere between 40 and 50 per cent of American voters favour the reform.

It remains to be seen just how far the administration will go towards implementing Obama’s vision of change. In part, this is because he is juggling many difficult priorities at once. In part, it’s because he is traveling uncharted territory. And finally, by offering to involve and empower the public in ‘co-creating’ government, Obama is unleashing an inherently disruptive force. As his administration’s early experiments with crowdsourcing have shown, hundreds of thousands of Americans are eager to take up his call to participate in new ways – and that’s without his having pushed hard to publicise the opportunity. What happens when those numbers climb into the millions, and people who have been invited to have a voice now expect to be listened to?

It isn’t just that online collaborative platforms for public input and participation can be gamed, and thus special interest groups or semi-organised pranksters can seemingly hijack such sites to make mischief. Ideally, the more often government enables such interaction to happen, the less meaningful those disruptions will become. It’s only when the chance to participate is kept rare that the value of gaming these sites stays high.

The more difficult issue for advocates of opening up a process of ‘co-creating’ government is what might happen when newly empowered citizens inevitably collide with entrenched interests. Obama’s vision of enlisting the public in a new, socially-conscious and transparent process of improving how government works – “You can be the eyes and ears” – may be exhilarating, but it also may lead to all kinds of unexpected consequences. The subcontractor who is skimming Recovery funds that are supposed to be spent on building that new school may be a cousin of the local mayor, who may be tied to the Democratic Party, or his workers may belong to a construction union that endorsed the President’s election. In other words, local e-democracy, Obama-style, could easily crash head-on into local power politics.

We don’t know yet how this story will play out. But the evolving history of the social web offers one encouraging hint. From Wikipedia to Craigslist to Amazon to Google, the web keeps rewarding those actors who empower ordinary users, eliminate wasteful middlemen, share information openly, and shift power from the centre to the edges. Applying those same principles to government will undoubtedly be messy, but Obama has one thing going for him: it is where technology is already taking us.

Micah L. Sifri is Co-founder and Editor of the Personal Democracy Forum

This essay is one of a collection of viewpoints which will be published to launch NESTA’s ‘Reboot Britain’ programme. Reboot Britain will explore the role new technologies and online networks can play in driving economic growth and radically changing our public services. The programme will begin with a one day event on 6th July which will look at the challenges we face as a country and how the combination of a new digital technologies and networked 'Digital Britons' can produce innovative solutions to tackle them. For more information please visit www.nesta.org.uk

voicesMoyes' tragedy is one the Deputy PM understands all too well, says Matthew Norman
Arts & Entertainment
Such tweet sorrow: Will's gone digital
Matthew Mcnulty and Jessica Brown Findlay in 'Jamaica Inn'
mediaHundreds complain over dialogue levels in period drama
Arts & Entertainment
Rocker of ages: Chuck Berry
musicWhy do musicians play into old age?
Arts & Entertainment
With Jo Joyner in 'Trying Again'
tvHe talks to Alice Jones on swapping politics for pillow talk
Jilly's jewels: gardener Alan Titchmarsh
peopleCountry Life magazine's list of 'gallant' public figures throws light on what it means to be a gentleman in the modern world
John Terry goes down injured in the 70th minute
sportAtletico Madrid 0 Chelsea 0: Blues can finish the job at Stamford Bridge, but injuries to Terry and Cech are a concern for Mourinho
<b>Rebecca Adlington</b>
<br />This, the first British swimmer to win two
Olympic gold medals in 100 years, is the eversmiling
face of the athletes who will, we're
confident, make us all proud at London 2012
peopleRebecca Adlington on 'nose surgery'
Arts & Entertainment
tvJudge for yourself
Life & Style
Life & Style
Tough call: is the psychological distress Trott is suffering an illness? (Getty)
healthJonathan Trott and the problems of describing mental illness
Life & Style
23 April 2014: Google marks St George's Day with a drawing depicting England's patron saint slaying a fire-breathing dragon
Life & Style
On the dogwalk: a poodle on the runway during a Mulberry show in London
fashionThe duo behind Asos and Achica have launched a new venture offering haute couture to help make furry companions fashionable
peopleEmma Appleton says photographer said he would shoot her for magazine if she slept with him
peopleRevealed: Goop.com's losses - and the pay rises
Travel Shop
the manor
Up to 70% off luxury travel
on city breaks Find out more
Up to 70% off luxury travel
on chic beach resorts Find out more
sardina foodie
Up to 70% off luxury travel
on country retreats Find out more
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition iPad app?
Independent Dating

By clicking 'Search' you
are agreeing to our
Terms of Use.

ES Rentals

    iJobs Job Widget
    iJobs Gadgets & Tech

    Projects Financial Analyst - Global Technology firm

    £55000 - £62000 per annum + outstanding benefits and bonus: Pro-Recruitment Gr...

    Commercial B2B Pricing Specialist - Global Bids and Tenders

    £35000 - £45000 per annum + excellent company benefits : Pro-Recruitment Group...

    Senior Finance Business Partner / Projects Analyst

    £55000 - £67000 per annum + Benefits + Bonus: Pro-Recruitment Group: Senior Fi...

    SQL DBA Lead Database Administrator (SQL, UNIX, Sybase, T-SQL)

    Negotiable: Harrington Starr: SQL DBA Lead Database Administrator (SQL, UNIX, ...

    Day In a Page

    Brits who migrate to Costa del Sol more unhappy than those who stay at home

    It's not always fun in the sun: Moving abroad does not guarantee happiness

    Brits who migrate to Costa del Sol more unhappy than those who stay at home
    Migrants in Britain a decade on: They came, they worked, they stayed in Lincolnshire

    Migrants in Britain a decade on

    They came, they worked, they stayed in Lincolnshire
    Chris Addison on swapping politics for pillow talk

    Chris Addison on swapping politics for pillow talk

    The 'Thick of It' favourite thinks the romcom is an 'awful genre'. So why is he happy with a starring role in Sky Living's new Lake District-set series 'Trying Again'?
    Why musicians play into their old age

    Why musicians play into their old age

    Nick Hasted looks at how they are driven by a burning desire to keep on entertaining fans despite risking ridicule
    How can you tell a gentleman?

    How can you tell a gentleman?

    A list of public figures with gallant attributes by Country Life magazine throws a fascinating light on what it means to be a gentleman in the modern world
    Pet a porter: posh pet pampering

    Pet a porter: posh pet pampering

    The duo behind Asos and Achica have launched a new venture offering haute couture to help make furry companions fashionable
    A History of the First World War in 100 moments: The mutiny that sent a ripple of fear through the Empire

    A History of the First World War in 100 moments

    The mutiny that sent a ripple of fear through the Empire
    Hot stuff: 10 best kettles

    Hot stuff: 10 best kettles

    Celebrate St George’s Day with a nice cup of tea. Now you just need to get the water boiled
    Sam Wallace: Why Giggs is perfect fit as Manchester United boss... in the longer term

    Sam Wallace

    Why Ryan Giggs is perfect fit as Manchester United boss... in the longer term
    Renaud Lavillenie: The sky's the limit for this pole vaulter's ambitions

    Renaud Lavillenie: The sky's the limit for this pole vaulter's ambitions

    Having smashed Sergei Bubka's 21-year-old record, the French phenomenon tells Simon Turnbull he can go higher
    Through the screen: British Pathé opens its archives

    Through the screen

    British Pathé opens its archives
    The man behind the papier mâché mask

    Frank Sidebottom

    The man behind the papier mâché mask
    Chris Marker: Mystic film-maker with a Midas touch

    Mystic film-maker with a Midas touch

    Chris Marker retrospective is a revelation
    Boston runs again: Thousands take to the streets for marathon as city honours dead and injured of last year's bombing

    Boston runs again

    Thousands of runners take to the streets as city honours dead of last year
    40 years of fostering and still holding the babies (and with no plans to retire)

    40 years of fostering and holding the babies

    In their seventies and still working as specialist foster parents