Rhodri Marsden: Should my employer be allowed to snoop on me online?
Wednesday 18 November 2009
Each week turns up new warnings of the dangers of revealing too much about yourself online. It's not long since the wife of the current head of MI6 unwittingly posted sensitive details of their London residence, while tabloid journalists constantly mine social networking sites to provide astonishing revelations that human beings really enjoy drinking alcohol and having sex. And we're routinely told that our often undeletable online presence – our digital tattoo, as some now call it – may as well be stapled to our CV when we apply for jobs; fervently hoping that a prospective employer won't curiously Google our name is as naive as attending an interview for the position of Housing Benefit Investigation Officer while wearing a gimp mask and a rubber apron and hoping it won't affect our chances.
But at the weekend the Law Society warned employers that using social networking sites to vet employees could leave them vulnerable to discrimination claims. "It's possible to obtain information about a person's sexual orientation or religious beliefs," said John Morris, chair of their Employment Law Committee, "that can impact or be perceived to impact on the decision to recruit or not recruit that person." The Employment Practices Data Protection Code also states that employers should only use this kind of vetting under special circumstances – eg for a job working with the vulnerable – and that any information that they glean is potentially unreliable.
As we seem unable to resist the urge to share everything online, from holiday snaps to thoughts on capital punishment, it's heartening to see the Law Society throwing some of the onus back on employers to ignore all this guff, or at least treat it with scepticism. But let's be frank: people get crossed off shortlists for spurious reasons all the time – untidy handwriting, sweating profusely, laughing inappropriately during job interviews – and whatever a rejection letter might say, we never get to find out the real reasons. Regardless of the fact that a picture of us drinking gin while wearing a tutu has no bearing on our ability to use Microsoft Excel, we're never going to stop employers making negative judgements about us based on our online presence – indeed, a survey in the US back in August suggests that around 35 per cent regularly do so. What to do? Well, you could delete your MySpace – come on, it's old hat; lock down your Facebook and ignore friend requests from strangers; and shove any vaguely impressive information on LinkedIn, a website so dull as to effectively resemble a CV in any case.
Email any technology gripes to email@example.com
elephant appealThe first 23 lots in our charity auction have now gone. But there are 22 more still up for grabs
Look beyond the usual shows for the best festive telly
Geoffrey Macnab does not like the comedian's big screen debut
The battle for control of Stieg Larsson's £30m legacy
Life & Style blogs
The 10 Best Scotch Whiskies
America's 'virgin births'? One in 200 mothers 'became pregnant without having sex'
GTA 5: Rockstar bans gamers stealing in-game money worth millions
Winter Solstice 2013: Shortest day of the year marked with 'knitted' Google Doodle
In pictures: Christmas in London through the ages
- 1 Tim Sherwood challenges Daniel Levy to set out vision for Tottenham Hotspur’s future
- 2 French pub fined €9,000 after customers returned empties to bar - because it's 'undeclared labour'
- 3 Sun will 'flip upside down' within weeks, says Nasa
- 4 #Teamnigella: It’s the only side to be on
- 5 Christmas comes early: Justin Bieber is 'retiring from music'
- < Previous
- Next >
iJobs Gadgets & Tech
£25000 - £35000 per annum + benefits+bonus+package: Harrington Starr: PHP Deve...
£380 - £410 per day: PCR Recruitment Limited: Agile Business Analyst with expe...
£70000 - £80000 Per Annum: Clearwater People Solutions Ltd: Solutions Architec...
£30000 - £36000 per annum: PCR Recruitment Limited: We are looking for an inno...