Gadgets & Tech

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Robot scientists 'can think for themselves'

Reuters

Watch out scientists -- you may be replaced by a robot.

Two teams of researchers said on Thursday they had created machines that could reason, formulate theories and discover scientific knowledge on their own, marking a major advance in the field of artificial intelligence.

Such robo-scientists could be put to work unraveling complex biological systems, designing new drugs, modeling the world's climate or understanding the cosmos.

For the moment, though, they are performing more humble tasks.

At Aberystwyth University in Wales, Ross King and colleagues have created a robot called Adam that can not only carry out experiments on yeast metabolism but also reason about the results and plan the next experiment.

It is the world's first example of a machine that has made an independent scientific discovery -- in this case, new facts about the genetic make-up of baker's yeast.

"On its own it can think of hypotheses and then do the experiments, and we've checked that it's got the results correct," King said in an interview.

"People have been working on this since the 1960s. When we first sent robots to Mars, they really dreamt of the robots doing their own experiments on Mars. After 40 or 50 years, we've now got the capability to do that."

Their next robot, Eve, will have much more brain power and will be put to work searching for new medicines.

King hopes the application of intelligent robotic thinking to the process of sifting tens of thousands of compounds for potential new drugs will be particularly valuable in the hunt for treatments for neglected tropical diseases like malaria.

King published his findings in the journal Science, alongside a second paper from Hod Lipson and Michael Schmidt of Cornell University in New York, who have developed a computer program capable of working out the fundamental physical laws behind a swinging double pendulum.

Just by crunching the numbers -- and without any prior instruction in physics -- the Cornell machine was able to decipher Isaac Newton's laws of motion and other properties.

Lipson does not think robots will make scientists obsolete any day soon, but believes they could take over much of the routine work in research laboratories.

"One of the biggest problems in science today is finding the underlying principles in areas where there are lots and lots of data," he told reporters in a conference call. "This can help in accelerating the rate at which we can discover scientific principles behind the data."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

I can't see the point of this
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Friday, 3 April 2009 at 01:31 pm (UTC)
What is the point of spending so much time trying to artificially reproduce.....what we ourselves already are? We're so much better than robots. We can do so much more.

Is this the ultimate vanity of the human race? Trying to mechanically build a replica of our own selves?
Re: I can't see the point of this
[info]gary52 wrote:
Saturday, 4 April 2009 at 03:44 am (UTC)
Maybe they could build an A.I. economist, it couldn't do any worse than the human(?) ones we have. Just don't program-in the greed and corruption and we should be fine.
[info]asmodanus wrote:
Friday, 3 April 2009 at 01:53 pm (UTC)
Making their own discovers means that this IS artificial intelligence, which means that we are much closer to the future then we thought :D
Actually..
[info]stanley_oz wrote:
Sunday, 5 April 2009 at 01:56 am (UTC)
Man already created [Abrahamic] "God" in *his* own image.
By working towards building a more sophisticated robot, Man is actually trying to build a more productive, efficient and precise *worker* in his own image. The latter is going to be useful to our continued survival in a world relying on high technologies. The former may one day hopefully find its way to the junkyard of history.

One should take a moment to reflect the progress we already made however: bronze-age brains create "God", information-age brains create "Robot".
Anyone else see a parallel?
[info]0191mark wrote:
Saturday, 4 April 2009 at 11:23 am (UTC)
"Is this the ultimate vanity of the human race? Trying to mechanically build a replica of our own selves?"

Well, if that is what's happening here then what else does it mean, because according to the bible God created us as an image of himself - so what would that make these scientists, and what would it make the bible?

And, could that mean a new bible is already in it's early stages?
Actually ....
[info]stanley_oz wrote:
Sunday, 5 April 2009 at 01:57 am (UTC)
Man already created [Abrahamic] "God" in *his* own image.
By working towards building a more sophisticated robot, Man is actually trying to build a more productive, efficient and precise *worker* in his own image. The latter is going to be useful to our continued survival in a world relying on high technologies. The former may one day hopefully find its way to the junkyard of history.

One should take a moment to reflect the progress we already made however: bronze-age brains create "God", information-age brains create "Robot".
This is not AI, just a sophisticated algorithm
[info]stanley_oz wrote:
Sunday, 5 April 2009 at 01:50 am (UTC)
The field of robotics and artificial intelligence badly needs additional funding, especially in Europe and USA, just to stay competitive with Japan. So I cannot blame them for claiming "a huge breakthrough" in artificial intelligence with these robots.

However, because they did not actually furnish a better explanation of what it is they actually built, here it is:
These robots are designed to "mindlessly" perform repetitive tasks. What separates these robots from those that build cars at a factory, is that these have instruments that give better feedback about the end result of the task they perform. They store the result. Calculate the "progress" being made between this iteration and a previous iteration. Plot a "hypothetical" goal based on this and alter the task (eg the chemicals being injected into the petri-dish) accordingly to try out that goal.
In pharmaceutical industry, before a drug is tested, thousands of slight variations on the drug - strength, purity, additional drugs (for a more comprehensive effect) etc have to be mandatorily tested for our own safety.

These robots will simply mean that instead of having some University post-grads perform 10,000 iterations over a week, working double-shifts, the robot will do it overnight with less chance of an error.
They'll even include test-sampling for Quality Assurance by a human to verify that the robot was not "off" in its experiments.

These robots are actually a fundamentally good development for researchers, but Artificial Intelligence they are not.

It is funny to see people post alarmist comments without first getting to understand what it is they are commenting on. Anthropologically, I get to experience what it must have felt like for my great-grandparents to hear radio for the first time. Or see an automated production line. lol

"Oh teh nos, teh robotsez r going 2 kill us allz!!!!!!11!!one!!!eleven!!!"
The promise of AI just never materialises
[info]corporeal4now wrote:
Sunday, 5 April 2009 at 04:57 pm (UTC)

There has been talk of AI for the last 30 years and more.
But when an AI robot can pass its driving test on a busy work day at school finishing time, I'll believe it.
I dont think it will happen, mainly because the world as we know it wont last long enough ...
Wobblerly Machines
[info]humble_sparrow wrote:
Monday, 6 April 2009 at 08:08 am (UTC)
Maybe one day they will secretly research their own locomotion and wobble out of the lab only to take over the world and then where we will be ?

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date