Steve Jobs 'not strong enough' to attend meeting
Thursday 30 April 2009
Latest in News
On Facebook
Life & Style blogs
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
London Fashion Week countdown
London Fashion Week is nearly upon us (again) and the invites are fast piling up. Our fashion team w...
HIV orphans in Thailand prepare for the future
In Baan Gerda, a community for HIV infected or affected youngsters in Northern Thailand, a group of ...
Ailing Apple CEO Steve Jobs was too weak to attend a meeting on Tuesday, according to his lawyer.
Jobs, who is on extended medical leave from the electronics giant, was due to attend a Woodside Town Council meeting about a historic Californian mansion that he wants to demolish.
His lawyer Howard Ellman told the council: "I don't think he would be strong enough if we were here until 1 a.m., and I think there's a strong possibility of that," according to the Mercury News report.
He referred to health issues that have seen him on leave from Apple since January.
There was been much talk about Jobs' health since he appeared at several industry events in 2008 looking extremely thin. The internet lit up with speculation as to what was wrong with him.
He then publically admitted that he was suffering from a hormone imbalance, but saying he would continue to run Apple. A week later he said that his health issues were "more complex" than first thought and temporarily stepped down as CEO.
He did not present his usual keynote address at this year's MacWorld conference in San Francisco, further fuelling rumours about his health issues.
The 54-year-old pancreatic cancer survivor is scheduled to return to Apple in June, which board member Arthur Levinson said is still going to happen.
"Nothing has changed," Levinson said in February.
Jobs' appearance at the council meeting was the latest chapter in a battle over a dilapidated 14 bedroom mansion that he wants to demolish to build a new house.
He was given permits in 2004 to knock down the building, but preservationists sued him to stop the demolition.
It will cost $13.3 to restore the mansion, originally built for mining mogul Daniel C Jackling in 1925. The new house would cost $5.1 million less to construct.
This article originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald
- 1 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 4 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Police confiscate passport from Brooks' assistant
- 7 Nauru and Abkhazia: One is a destitute microstate marooned in the South Pacific, the other is a disputed former Soviet Republic 13,000km away, so why are they so keen to be friends?
- 8 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
No secularism please, we're British
Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
New Arsenal face an old question of credibility in San Siro




Comments