Putting your life in the hands of medical robots
Robots as assistants to the surgeon
This week I will be speaking at the Cheltenham Science Festival on use of robots in surgery, and I’m keen to increase awareness and support for this growing field, through festivals and my support of the "Science: [So what? So everything campaign]".
Since I helped to start this area, some 20 years ago, it has developed internationally and now has a major influence on surgery. As the world's first Professor of Medical Robotics at Imperial College, London, I developed a robot for prostate surgery called Probot, which was used clinically in April 1991, and was thus the first robot in the world, to be used to autonomously remove tissue from human patients. As a result of my experiences, it became clear to me that the surgeon needed to be an integral part of the procedure and not just be limited to observing what was taking place whilst his only activity was to keep his hands on the emergency-off button.
I then developed a concept of what I call "hands-on" robots in which the surgeon is an integral part of the activity. The surgeon holds a force-controlled handle at the tip of the robot and moves the robot around within the required region, whilst the robot actively constrains him to a safe and precise location. This synergy between the ability of the surgeon to be part of the procedure, whilst the robot provides accuracy and constraint, seems to be very acceptable to both surgeons and patients. The term Active Constraint ROBOT led to the formation, together with Orthopaedic Surgeon Professor Justin Cobb, of my spin-off from Imperial College London called the ACROBOT Company limited. Using the Acrobot robotic systems for orthopaedic surgery, ACROBOT have demonstrated that the robot gives a superior performance to that of the unaided surgeon for procedures that are difficult to carry out conventionally.
In my view surgical robots should not only have the surgeon in-charge, but be relatively simple and low-cost systems that conduct procedures which the surgeon finds difficult to undertake. There is little point in having a robot which performs tasks which the surgeon can perform reasonably well without a robot, since it will be difficult to justify the extra cost, and possibly time, required for the surgery. The reason that time is important is that, whilst we as patients may wish to have the most accurate surgery, the surgeons are under pressure to complete their surgical lists. Thus there is likely to be pressure on the surgeon from the hospital administration to sacrifice accuracy, whose benefits may be seen at a later date, for time-saving today.
Over the last decade, surgical robots have become smaller, simpler and dedicated to specific tasks. As sensors and computer-controlled systems have become more powerful, we are starting to see the emergence of smaller "intelligent tools" in the hands of the medical community as a whole, not just surgeons. These should be developed to provide the sensing and tool actions which the medical practitioner finds difficult, whilst allowing the medic to undertake tasks which he finds relatively straightforward. In this way, we hope to minimise the cost and complexity of robotic systems, whilst maximising their benefit to both the medical community and to patients. I may be biased, but I for one would trust my life with one of my robots.
Professor Davies is speaking at the Cheltenham Science Festival, 3-7 June
Liam Neeson's Downton dreams
Thriller is set in the secret world of British espionage
Bomber jacket worn by Mary Berry sells out within an hour
Life & Style blogs
Hipster hate is everywhere - but is there a little bit of them in all of us?
Jennifer Lawrence nude pictures leaked: Reddit removes 'The Fappening' board dedicated to sharing naked pictures of celebrities
A bottle of wine a day is not bad for you and abstaining is worse than drinking, scientist claims
iOS 8 download: how to free up space on your iPhone or iPad to install update
U2 album removal tool released by Apple (but you can't escape: Bono is always on your iPhone)
- 1 Scottish independence: Learn from Quebec's mistakes and beware of promises. Vote Yes.
- 2 iOS 8 is full of shiny new features - but it's terrible news for app developers
- 3 A bottle of wine a day is not bad for you and abstaining is worse than drinking, scientist claims
- 4 Hitler’s former food taster reveals the horrors of the Wolf’s Lair
- 5 Cocaine and cannabis haul hidden in Vatican car seized by French police
Unpaid Voluntary Position : Reach Volunteering: Promising volunteer Trustee op...
£30000 - £35000 Per Annum: Clearwater People Solutions Ltd: Our client is curr...
£110 - £130 per hour: Randstad Education Reading: Psychology Teacher needed fo...
£85 - £120 per day: Randstad Education Cheshire: Randstad Education are curren...