'Legal highs' crackdown is doomed to failure, say experts
Clubbers stay one step ahead as the Government lags behind on drug reform
Dealers of recreational drugs will barely be affected by the Home Office's crackdown on "legal highs" because manufacturers have already developed alternative substances that will escape prohibition.
The British Government has been so far behind other European countries in tackling drugs like GBL and BZP that revellers have already moved on to the next high, according to toxicology experts.
The Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, announced on Thursday that shewas planning to classify BZP – a drug similar to ecstasy which is also known as "Benny" and was originally a worming treatment for cattle – as a class-C substance, outlawing its trade and possession in the UK.
But specialists say that manufacturers in China and on theContinent have already diverted their resources to producing large batches of mephedrone, a drug with effects similar to cocaine which will remain entirely legal.
Mephedrone, nicknamed "meph" and sometimes marketed as plant food, is sold for as little as £15 a gram online and in high street "head shops" (which sell bongs and rolling paraphernalia). It is a member of the methcathinone family of substances which is distantly related to the khat plant. Metabolism of cathinone produces chemicals structurally similar to amphetamine and adrenaline. "Legal highs" is the catch-all tag for an array of drugs that take users out of their bodies while staying within the law.
A coroner called for BZP to be banned after the death of 22-year-old mortgage broker Daniel Backhouse, who had mixed the substance with ecstasy powder, while last month in Brighton, Heather Stewart, 21, died after taking the party drug GBL, an industrial solvent.
"The UK is slow and behind the times in banning BZP," said Dr John Ramsey, a toxicologist at St George's University of London, who is also the director of Tic Tac Communications, a drug analysis body that studies recreational drugs. "We can't rely on the Home Office to play catch up when it comes to these drugs. We need a sensible debate in the media about their potential risks."
But it is mephedrone that is increasingly partygoers' legal high of choice. Users report intense euphoria, talkativeness and increased levels of energy. It is already illegal in Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Israel, but at present there are no plans to ban it in Britain.
The Swedish ban came after mephedrone was linked to the death of an 18-year-old woman in Stockholm last December.
Because the substances are legal, little is known about their side-effects or circulation. "Nobody is investigating them," said Dr Ramsey. "The problem is to try to collect the information. It's all under the radar, and people [who arrive] in A&E aren't very honest about what they have taken."
He continued: "No one has the remotest idea of what the long-term effects of taking these substances are – they could interact with legitimate medication such as contraceptive pills and HIV medication, or they could cause birth defects. But because they are not [illegal] drugs they're not tested by the pharmaceutical industry so we simply don't know how bad they are for you yet."
Prior to the development of legal synthetic drugs, the market was full of so-called "herbal highs" that were relatively benign products containing caffeine or ephedrine from the herbs guarana and ephedra whose effects were not much more powerful than a strong cup of coffee.
The popularity of legal highs grew sharply when BZP substances were introduced to the market in the late 1990s and it has taken governments across Europe a decade to classify it as illegal. In March 2008, the European Union decided that all member states should control the use of BZP by March 2009, but in the UK it remains legal, pending the change in the law. On YouTube, videos promoting meph are quickly "flagged" as offensive by other meph users, to try to keep the substance's profile low (and hence postpone any legislative action against it).
Dr Ramsey said: "I don't think your average 15-year-old would dream that he could buy a something legal from a 'head shop' on the high street that might kill him."
The user: 'It's easy to get – all you need is a debit card and internet access'
Sebastian Scott, 26, lives in Clapham, south London. He is originally from Australia and works as a project manager in local government.
"I have tried ecstasy, acid, ketamine, weed, mushrooms, MDMA, and coke. Up to last year I used MDMA and coke on a regular basis when I went out clubbing. But then I heard about meph[edrone] through a friend who raved about it. All I had to do was Google it and lots of shops came up as selling it. I bought two grams for €40 (£35) and the postman delivered it to my front door two days later.
"By the end of the weekend it was all gone. It's very similar to the effect you get with coke but much cheaper, so now I only do meph. It's easier to get hold of because all you need is a debit card and internet access. It makes you talkative, happy, a bit spaced, energised and time seems to go faster. Because the high is short you end up using quite a lot. The comedown is worse than for any of the illegal stuff I have tried; it makes you really emotional and anti-social. But I feel safer using it and I know it's legal.
"I still hide the bag of meph in my shoe when I go out. To a bouncer it doesn't matter, they will assume it's coke. It would be frustrating to get thrown out when you are not on the wrong side of the law."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited






Comments
All the smears and lies about the effects of cannabis has proved to young drug-takers that you can't believe anything the government says.
The very few cases of death from BZP have been from people mixing it with Ectasy. Mixing drugs is always a danger. The number of deaths are not statistically significant.
It is better that people take drugs that are clinically controlled with warnings rather than some tablet bought from a criminal that contains bleach or any number of harmful substances.
Say if you deccrimalized canabis you could sell cakes & tea a move that would enable users to digest rather than smoke which could well reduce things like lung cancer & other illnesses associated with smoking. The trouble is we live in a drug culture you have alcoholic beverage makers enticing young kids to drink. Alcohol is very much a toxic neurological drug. I wonder if the tabacco firms acted in the same maner as these alcoholic beverage manufacters, making ciggerettes different colours to attract kids, they'd be outrage, why the difference with alcohol?
In fact the lighter clear resins are actually more, pure more, refined in the United States they call it Honey oil.
Black resin is actually the cheaper less a slot after. And in the United States they call Mexican hash. It's not very good stuff.
Using a low heat distiller you can easily purify the cheap stuff and turn it into the more expensive and hard to find amber resins.
Cannabis is illegal, but it's my drug of choice.
Why am I not (yet) free to choose?
Everything with the government is about taxes, the reason marijuana it is illegal is because it cannot be controlled and properly taxed.
Anyone can grow it, and just about anywhere, the same cannot be said for tobacco. It is controlled and it is taxed. The same goes with alcohol, not everyone can make alcohol that you would want to drink, it is a controlled substance that the government makes money off of by taxing it.
It doesn't matter that alcohol kills thousands upon thousands of people every year either through auto accidents or health related alcohol problems. They don't really care what they care about is the money that comes from the taxes. And of course the same goes for tobacco it doesn't matter that smoking tobacco causes cancer kills tens of thousands of people the year they don't care. All the government cares about is control and taxes.
Almost every illegal drug, is only illegal because they cannot control it and cannot tax it.
But actually it's not quite fair to say the only reason alcohol is illegal is for commercial reasons. Many countries, including the UK experimented with legislation to control alcoholism. In the early 19th century, the British government were very concerned about the amount of alcohol being consumed, especially amongst the working classes.
They dabbled with legislation, such as the Beer Bill, to try and reduce the amounts of spirits being consumed. But this didn't really work because the new savvy middle classes were capitalizing on the commercial profits of alcohol. When prohibition was even mentioned to be introduced, the population would just not have it and in this aspect the government was powerless.
I understand what you're saying, and I personally hate alcohol, but my point is, yes the government are making huge tax profits from alcohol, but that doesn't mean that people don't love going out boozing, getting legless and razzed on friday and saturday nights.
Maybe cannabis would cause less deaths per year, and it's easy to say for us, as I suspect most people in this forum talking about drugs aren't the biggest boozers. But alcoholism is a deep rooted problem within british society and has been for many hundreds of years, and the main problem of it is that people love it so much. When the working man in the 19th century had no where to go but his dirt ridden house, cramped with his 12 children or the public house, which do you think he turned to? This was something the working man had that the government could not take from him.
Any sensible government would have de-criminalised safe recreational chemicals like MDMA, LSD and cannabis years ago.
When will the govournment take a stand on the alcohol abuse in this country, thats a big no,no eh, alcohol brings in far too much revenue so that one gets swept under the carpet.
I`m in my 40`s and have tried most drugs that have come and gone in the past 25 yrs and to be honest, I`ve had a ball, none of my mates dropped dead from a clean E but i have had a friend die from being hit by a drunk driver and another that has wrecked his internal organs from drinking.
As i`m getting older i can`t rave all night like i used to so i treat myself and my wife to some mephedrone once every couple of weeks and we have a great night in,we don`t force our indulgence on anyone else and do no harm to anyone else, we have been doing this since the "research chemical" came on the market over two yrs ago. I hold down a highly technical job and this chemical doesn`t interfere with my life at all.
I thought i would just put in a point of view from the other side to even things up a bit.
Don`t knock it until you have tried it.
Does it really look like they are going to be band?