Health & Families

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 7° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

More sugar in rusks than a chocolate digestive

Study finds 'healthy' baby foods contain 'staggering' levels of saturated fat

By Martin Hickman, Consumer Affairs Editor

The study found that some products were worse than junk food for fat and sugar

REX

The study found that some products were worse than junk food for fat and sugar

Some baby foods contain "staggering" amounts of sugar and fat that make them worse than junk food, according to a survey published today.

Farley's Original Rusks contain more sugar than McVities Chocolate Digestives, and Heinz Toddler Mini Cheese Biscuits have proportionately more saturated fat than a McDonald's quarter pounder with cheese. Cow & Gate's Baby Balance Bear Biscuits meanwhile contain harmful trans fats that were improperly labelled, according to the Children's Food Campaign.

Its researchers examined the nutritional content of 107 foods marketed for babies and young children in UK supermarkets in March. Only half of the products were low in saturated fat, salt and sugar. Among Heinz products, the figure was just one in four.

In the case of Cow & Gate, one in nine products was high in sugars, with more than 15g of sugar per 100g.

"The results of this survey are staggering," said Children's Food Campaign joint co-ordinator Christine Haigh. "Many foods marketed for babies and young children are often advertised as 'healthy'. In reality, in terms of sugar and saturated fat, some are worse than junk food.

"In particular failing to correctly label products that contain dangerous trans fats is outrageous."

After being tipped off about the research, the Food Standards Agency contacted Cow & Gate to express concern at the company's labelling.

"The FSA is aware of this product and has been in contact with Cow & Gate to advise on labelling requirements for ingredients listing declarations of partially hydrogenated animal or vegetable fats or oils," the FSA said in a statement.

"We recommend to all companies that they reduce trans fats levels to a minimum by removing or replacing the hydrogenated vegetable oils with other ingredients, but without raising levels of saturated fat."

Cow & Gate said it reformulated its baby foods in 2007 so more than 90 per cent contained only naturally-occuring sugars. " Of our babyfoods tested by Sustain, only four had sugar levels above 15%. Three of these are biscuits, which require sugar in the recipe and contain 18% total sugars. This is less than most comparable adult varieties and other baby biscuits," a spokeswoman said. "In discussion with the Food Standards Agency we have already taken the decision to discontinue our baby biscuits, when we became aware of presence of hydrogenated fat, which contains a very small amount of trans-fats."

Heinz said it sells reduced sugar rusks with 30 per cent less sugar than Farley's Original Rusks which, it said, have been enjoyed by "generations of babies". It accused the Children's Food Campaign of misleading the public by comparing mini cheese biscuits, with a 25g portion size containing 1.8g saturated fat, with a 194g McDonald's quarter pounder containing 13g saturated fat.

The Children's Food Campaign, an arm of the food and farming group Sustain, carried out the survey to see if baby foods had become more healthy since another group, the Food Commission, published a report in 2000 called Good for sales – bad for babies.

"Nearly a decade on, the survey demonstrates that some companies have taken virtually no action to improve the healthiness of products marketed for babies and young children," said Ms Haigh.

"In addition, Cow & Gate failed to provide our researcher with the requested summary of the nutritional information for all its foods marketed for babies and young children."

She called on the Government to obtain a commitment from companies marketing food for babies and young children to remove trans fats and reduce levels of saturated fat, salt and sugar. In addition, she said, they should develop an understandable labelling system for parents.

The Food Standards Agency said that although babies require fatty food to grow, parents should check the healthiness of products on labels.

How children's foods compare

Heinz Farley's Original Rusks
29g of sugars*
7.4g of fat
3.4g of saturated fat
0.02g of salt

McVities Plain Chocolate Digestives
27.3g of sugars
24g of fat
12.5g of saturated fat
0.3grams of salt

Heinz Toddler Mini Cheese Biscuits
12g of sugars
14.6g of fat
7.3g of saturated fat
1.1g of salt

McDonald's quarter pounder with cheese
5g of sugars
13g of fat
7g of saturated fat
1.1g of salt

* all figures per 100g

source: www.ocado.com

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

So how much is OK?
[info]mr_pedanticke wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 03:40 am (UTC)
We have seen reports of apparently well-fed children suffering malnutrician because their parents have been frightened by mis-information and don't realise that "healthy" adult diet is not appropriate for growing kids.

So it is all very well listing what is in the food, but wouldn't it have been helpful to tell us just how much is actually required by our children?
a load of misiformation..
[info]tommytcg wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 04:16 am (UTC)
based on ignorance, stemming from a faulty study in Framingham, Massachusetts in 1953. As neither dietary saturated fat, nor raised blood cholesterol cause heart disease, most of this article is based on pseudo-scientific nonsense: Taking away the saturated fat from childrens diets will cause them tol suffer from undernutrition, by missing out on healthgiving eggs, butter, organ meats etc. The identified causes of heart disease are raised tri-glycerides, blood fats raised by sugars, carbohydrates and alcohol; raised lipo-protein alpha, lowered with Vitamin C supplements; and raised homocysteine, lowered with Vitamin B6, B12 and folic acid supplements. Or if you are ery lucky, enough of these vitamins are in the diet. Trans fats yes, a culprit, but to group saturated fats with transfats is basing that statement on a fallacy, and is harmful. As the medical profession remains up to 55 years behind on nutritional advice, (taking 400 years to accept the natural cure for scurvy that was vitamin C, and still not accepting, after 2000 years the natural malaria cure, artemesia absinthium, wormwood, ) one must seek knowledge from outside of mainstream medicine. Unfortunately for most, doctors only get , a few hours of nutiriton lectures in 6 years of med. schoo, and that mostly misinformation. What one need is the real science that comes from science, biochemical, clinical nutrition, orthomolecular medicine etc journals, which few doctors read. I have been absorbing this for nearly half a century, as a professional in the health industry.
Re: a load of misiformation..
[info]fitness4london wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 07:43 am (UTC)
You're completely wrong when you say that saturated fats don't contribute to heart disease. There is mountains of evidence that it does. Noboby is saying avoid all foods that contain some saturated fats, as you rightly say there are healthgiving foods like eggs and red meat that contain varying proportions of saturated fats. But it is possible to choose low fat versions of these foods.

But you're wrong to say that without eating foods that contain saturated fat, children will suffer from undernutrition. That's a crazy statement. Have you not heard of monounsaturated fats and polyunsaturated fats, the good fats? Yes, without these, children would be undernourished. You're getting muddled between saturated and unsaturated fats.

You're competely wrong again when you say that raised blood cholesterol doesn't contribute to heart disease. I think you're getting muddled up between cholesterol in food and blood cholesterol.
Re: a load of misiformation..
[info]tommytcg wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 12:10 pm (UTC)
Good fats, bad fats is hype to market polunsaturated fats. these that take up oxygen rapidly and rancify, they change their chemical composition when heated. Try the Dr S L Malhotra study in Lancet that showed those on the high sat. fat diet had one tenth the heart disease of pure vegetarians, same age group, same, activity level and same genetics, but geographically separated. The badly flawed Framingham study seems to have fooled most, and the corn oil marketers jumped on the false-hype bandwagon. No I havent mixed up my fats.
Re: a load of misiformation..
[info]fitness4london wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 02:55 pm (UTC)
I've not heard of the study you mention.

All the evidence I've seen is that monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats only rancify when re-heated, not when heated first time. But these fats are good for you (in moderation) when cold (such as nuts) or when heated only once (oily fish, olive oil in hot food).

You mention pure vegetarians, but even vegetarian diets can have high saturated fat content, such as coconut oil.

At least we agree that hydrogenated fats are bad for you!
Re: a load of misiformation..
[info]tommytcg wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 06:41 pm (UTC)
a little more reading will line you up, up and away from the BS cholesterol hoax. http://www.townsendletter.com/AugSept_2002/heartdisease0802.htm

In the study on Lancet sat, fats I mentioned, the pure vege group got their planr oils from seeds, smaller than the coconut. Also, polyunsaturated fats rancify rapidly without any heating.
Not to be taken at all seriously.
[info]sdioknou wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 10:54 am (UTC)
Who on earth are the "Children's Food Campaign"? Why do they need a "joint co-ordinator"? Is there any evidence whatsoever that these people have any idea whatsoever what they're talking about? I'll make it easy for you - the answer is no. Please do not waste the credibility of your newspaper on quoting self appointed experts, with no idea who are working to a (not very well) hidden agenda.
Re: Not to be taken at all seriously.
[info]fitness4london wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 03:10 pm (UTC)
The Children's Food Campaign does great work to champion healthy eating among young people, to boost their health. What hidden agenda are you referring to?

There is overwhelming evidence of the adverse health-effects from foods which contain high levels of saturated fat, hydrogenated fat, salt, and sugar.

Could it possibly be that the food manufacturing industry uses highly paid lobbyists to discredit health campaigns like those of The Children's Food Campaign?
rusks
[info]perrykeane wrote:
Monday, 4 May 2009 at 05:51 pm (UTC)
I am shocked that rusks are being removed from shops I was born in 1980 and i remember having rusks,theres nothing wrong with me.Keep them in the shops and let parents decide if they buy them or not.
Stop the govenment dictating every little part of our lives. Englands becoming a hitler nation!

Re: rusks
[info]worriedmother wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 07:18 pm (UTC)
Where in Hitler's manifesto did it say that they couldn't have rusks in shops? I knew he was a bad man but I didn't realise he had a problem with baby biscuits.


Free gym pass

Get fit for summer with Fitness First gyms in London

Download a free gym pass from Fitness First today

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date