One in six psychiatrists has tried to 'turn gays straight'
Therapists admit using harmful practices to 'cure' homosexuals despite evidence they do not work
REX FEATURES
A study of psychiatrists and therapists found that 17 per cent said they had treated at least one client to alter their homosexual feelings (Picture: Posed by a model)
Psychotherapists are offering to help "cure" gays and lesbians of their homosexuality without any evidence that such treatment is beneficial or safe. One in six said they had tried to turn gays straight, or reduce their gay or lesbian feelings, even though the mainstream medical view is that this is impossible.
The idea that homosexuality can be cured has a long and dubious history and the disclosure that a significant minority of therapists and doctors still think it is possible is "worrying", Professor Michael King, of the University College Medical School, said. "Heaven knows what they do. We didn't attempt to ask them because there is no evidence that anything works. We didn't expect it to be happening at this rate and we are really rather concerned. It ought to stop. It is distressing and harmful and there is absolutely no evidence it works," he said.
A study of more than 1,400 psychiatrists and therapists in BMC Psychiatry found that 222 (17 per cent) said they had treated at least one client to alter their homosexual feelings at some point. The researchers expected the cases to be concentrated in the past, but the 400 to 500 cases recorded were distributed evenly across the decades. "It is happening up to the present moment," Professor King said. It might only be the "tip of the iceberg".
Many therapists seemed uncomfortable with giving treatment, or admitting to it. When asked if they would attempt to change someone's sexual orientation if requested, only one in 25 (4 per cent) said they would – far fewer than the one in six who reported actually doing so. Pressure from clients demanding help because of bullying or discrimination or family pressures may have pushed the therapists into delivering it, the professor said.
The idea that homosexuality is an aberration from the norm which can be "corrected", rather than a natural state, was current for most of the last century. Everyone was thought to be basically heterosexual and homosexuality was regarded as a deviation from the norm, the result of "faulty learning" in childhood.
During the 1950s and 1960s, when belief in psychological behaviourism was at its height, aversion therapy was used to "cure" homosexuals. Male patients were given a slide show which included pictures of sexually attractive men and women and a lever that allowed them to change the slides. If they lingered too long over the pictures of the men, and did not move on swiftly enough to the pictures of the women, they received an electric shock. A variation of this treatment involved a drug that would make them vomit.
Aversion therapy, famously employed in Anthony Burgess's novel A Clockwork Orange to cure Alex, the leader of the Droogs gang, of his obsession with violence, was used up to the 1980s, but has since been discredited.
Other treatments included advice to masturbate to a homosexual fantasy and then switch to a heterosexual one near orgasm. Covert sensitisation was a method which required patients to counter homosexual thoughts with shameful fantasies of arrest by the police or discovery by their family. Hypnotherapy and psychoanalysis were also used.
Although not uncommon, these treatments never became mainstream in Britain. In the US, however, the idea that homosexuality can be cured retains wide support. There is an ex-gay movement, led by right-wing Christian groups, which promotes "reparative" therapy to return people to the heterosexual "norm". Supporters cite findings that depression is two to three times more common among young gay men as evidence that a homosexual orientation is itself harmful – rather than the responses of bullying and discrimination that it engenders.
Professor King, head of the psycho-sexual clinic at University College Hospital in London, said: "We do not have the same attitudes in Europe. But young people go on the internet, they see this stuff and they pop off to see a psychotherapist. If the therapist is not wise enough to say that this is a part of them and there is nothing pathological about it, they may get seduced into trying to change them. Instead, the therapist should be saying that it is very unfortunate they are being bullied and that they can try to help them come to terms with their situation and learn to cope with it."
Derek Munn, of the gay rights organisation Stonewall, said: "So-called gay cure therapies are wholly discredited. The conclusions of this research are a welcome reminder that what gay and lesbian people need is equal treatment by society, not misguided treatment by a minority of health professionals."
A patient's story: 'I got an electric shock if I looked at the man'
I think I always knew I was gay but there was, in the Sixties, an enormous social pressure on you not to be. I was a day pupil at a boarding school and there was some fairly broad-minded sexual play. Some people stayed there and some moved on to heterosexual activity – while your peer group and natural development is telling you that there is a very fuzzy edge, society is telling you that there is this very hard, black-and-white precipice. So, it becomes an area that you don't talk about with parents and people like that.
While I was a student back then, I had some successful heterosexual relationships. However, during that time I got involved in a strong relationship with a school friend which went on for a long time. When that broke up, it caused me a lot of anguish.
During my early twenties (the early 1970s), I became increasingly depressed and went to my GP. I ended up meeting one of the leading lights in treatments for homosexuality at the (local) university department of psychology. He used aversion therapy and an electric shock machine that was tied to the ankles and wrists. You then watched a number of slides, some [of men] which you find sexually attractive, some which [of women] were best identified as your heterosexual goal.
If you switch from the "gay" picture to the "heterosexual" picture then you don't get the electric shock. By today's standards, the pictures used were about as stimulating as a Reader's Digest. Each session lasted 30 or 40 minutes and I had about 30 sessions. In the fullness of time I got married and the sex thing... well, it never worked out.
My wife knows about these gay feelings. She tends to regard them as a threat in her own mind. It's still a very, very sensitive area. A few casual but long-term sexual friendships ensued with people who were – almost without exception – married.
My wife knows of these encounters and has tolerated them with increasing difficulty.
Increasingly I feel betrayed by the promises of treatment. After I left treatment where was the back up? My deepest feelings, the very structure of my being, had been torn apart in the name of science and left abandoned while the psychologists got on with building their own careers and lives.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited




Comments
If this cannot be proved,then I can see absolutely no harm in 17% of qualified psychiatrists attempting to resolve their patients' very real difficulty in determining how best to handle their sexual preferences.
A little less arrogance and 'I know best' please.
I grew up in a somewhat conservative city in the Midwestern US. When I was fourteen my family converted to Catholicism. I also realized that I was gay at this time. "Reparative therapy" based in religion stresses submission to God and praying for Him to take these urges away. If it were possible, I'd have "prayed the gay away" five years ago. Believe me, at that point, I though it would work. I also became quite homophobic to try and cover who I was and possibly give myself an extra push away from homosexuality. By the time I graduated, however, I realized that it was useless; my loving men is something more inborn than I thought. So inborn, in fact, that perhaps God had made me this way and it couldn't be changed. It was at this point that I stopped hating myself and started to love life. All the anguish I'd felt about being gay suddenly went away. Once I came out last year, I was truly able to be who I am instead of the me I'd created to hide who I truly was.
I hope this made some sense and gave you some insight. If you really want to see scientific proof, all you have to do is an online search. It's that easy. Trust me, you'll find nothing that proves that it's effective enough to be recommended nor safe enough to be allowed.
Dr. Hector H. O.
Bs. As.
Argentina.
It is heartening to hear that you have found happiness and are now living the good life.
I am not opposed to homosexuality in any way.
Indeed some of my best friends are...
I do however disagree with the idea that there is only one authorised way of handling sexual difference and that a minority group of some 17% of psychiatrists should not be 'allowed' to deviate from the norm.
The rather pompous dismissals attributed to the 'Establishment' represented by King and Mann come across as politically correct platitudes rather than the sort of hard evidence needed to demonstrate their certainties.
That's the actual problem.
Dr. Hooker found that out in the 50s when she asked the question without using a polluted sample (gay men with a history of mental illness). She said that prejudice is the problem when it comes to the mental health of gay people, not their sexuality. Yet, there continues to the faulty reasoning employed that says that gays are responsible for the bigotry they are met with. That's like trying to change blacks into whites or Jews into Christians. It's absurd.
Stop asking if homosexuality can be "cured" and start curing homophobia. That's the problem and it most certainly can be cured with education, not with some bizarro BDSM ritual.
Leave us alone!!!
Could you publish the reference for this paper - I can't find it anywhere on the BMC site
Philip Timms
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2
it was the first featured article on the bmc psychiatry site:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2
Sorry, and precisely which rights would those be, eh?
They are talentless wankers practicing ju-ju hokum CRAP.
These charlatans should be kicked out of the NHS permanently and made to do a proper job instead.
The american therapy culture where everyone worships the religion of therapy and counselling is utterly vile and pointless. Mumbo Jumbo nonsense and dangerous at that. And expensive. So some nosy mental counsllor be paid by you so you can tell her/him you secrets? WAKE UP PEOPLE! GET A LIFE! 90% of all therapy is utterly pointless and has been shown to be damaging, not to mention the dependence and lack of resilience it promotes. IT'S A SCAM FOLKS.
Sex does not exist just to procreate; it was a Darwinian development whi evolved in higher animals such as mammals to bond. The fact it make dem baby is not the purpose but just a byproduct of instinctive behaviour - like squirreks burying nuts and forgetting where some are so inadvertantly planting acorns which grow into great oaks.
And there is a big difference between gay behaviour (practised by all dem african americans in gaol) and innate orientation. And of course, animals such as apes, dolphins, dogs and many other mammals also indulge in gay behaviour so it is, literally, 'natural'.
(Oh and a third of straight couples practise anal sex and a third of gay couples don't... which is nice...)
Is this meant to be the sort of psychiatrist who thinks he can cure gay people or is it one of the others? I think you should caption it better.
Alternatively, it's a random picture of a person which adds absolutely no value to this story but costs the Indie (and its readers) money. Doesn't Guy Keleny on Saturday rage about this regularly.
! (that's an example of the sort of emotion I've just had but isn't actually it at all)
And newspapers wonder why they're going down the pan? When they pay models to pretend to be a psychiatrist who may or may not attempt to cure people of gayness, is it any wonder??
How many of these idiots 'decided' to be attracted to their wives, just because it seemed the right thing to do? Or wait a minute....maybe they were NATURALLY attracted to them, in the same way gay people are attracted to people of the same sex.
No can choose what turns them on. The idea that that can be done is laughable, and makes me realise how ignorant of even their own thoughts and feelings some humans are.
To anyone who thinks they 'choose' to like women - could you get sexually excited by looking at an apple? Should be quite easy...it's just a choice after all according to you...
How, in your tiny little bigoted mind, do you managed to conjur up a parallel between homosexuality and burglary?
On second thoughts, just try abstaining from discussing your bigotry and prejudice - maybe that means you won't be a bigot. I am still convinced that CAN be cured.
Perhaps after all you share the arrogance displayed by King and Mann and cannot stand opinion at variance with your own.
Anyway,whatever your position,I am not convinced that minority psychiatric practice needs to be suppressed by the politically correct majority opinion which you seem to support.
I have to leave the subject now and wish you well in future.
The solution to this is quite simple. Gay men and women must learn to accept themselves. Also, it helps immensely to remember that homosexuality is just one of the rays belonging to the colourful spectrum of human sexuality. Each and every one of us is a sexual being. The desire to find a life partner or to link with a mate is innate. It sprouts at birth and matures when a person attains adulthood. Also, there is a growing understanding that one's sexuality is determined at conception, and it depends to a large extent on the cluster of genes one inherits from one's parents.
Yesh Prabhu
Plainsboro, NJ, USA
Ten years on I am still enraged by the hypocrisy and lack of honesty involved in this approach of denigrating LGBT behaviours as 'abnormal'. Freud and his disciples have left a trail of psychological wrecks in their wake through the application of dehumanizing and manipulative methods designed to 'cure' gays and trans people.
Psycotherapy is a lie.
With the study not being publicly available at this stage, it is difficult to know what the research specifically concluded and how the data relied on has been evaluated.
From what has been reported, the conclusions appear to be at odds with other scientific and medical research in this area which has shown the success of therapies for those wishing to leave unwanted same-sex desires and behaviour. This has been achieved without mental distress. The results are comparable with similar approaches for those wishing to leave a drug or alcohol addiction behind them.
It is surprising, given the successful results with the latter, that people should wish to deny the same freedom to obtain treatment to those wishing to deal with their unwanted same-sex desires.
For those interested in investigating this area further, sound scientific and medical research - or references to - can be found by googling "homosexuality+change", along with other key words such as Spitzer, NARTH, Jones and Yarhouse, Whitehead, and Satinover.
It is disappointing that we rarely hear about such research in the media or those who have overcome their unwanted desires as often is the case for those who have overcome their alcohol or drug, or another, addiction.
It would also be helpful if the Health Editor could provide references for his claim that "the mainstream medical view is that this ("to turn gays straight, or reduce their gay or lesbian feelings") is impossible".
Fred
Just a thought....
Beware of Psychos. of any order
No, animals need procreation to survive, nature doesn't, you foolish bigot. Nature is not just animals and plants - nature includes everything that exists independently of humans. And homosexuality exists in the animal kingdom too.
You seriously think you can 'choose' what makes you sexually excited? Could you get an erection purely from looking at a can of coke? By your logic, you can, which seems pretty remarkable to me.
When one of your best arguments against homosexuality is 'it doesn't help to reproduce', then it shows you've run out of arguments.
Whether humans have made it this way or not, our lives are about way more than just breeding other humans. We might be 'robotic' in the way our brains work, but we're sure as hell not going to choose to live like robots, to live purely to breed. I don't know if I ever want kids, I'm not sure yet. I'm hetrosexual, but I don't owe it to mankind to keep producing. It's my life and my choice. That doesn't make me unatural, just because I might die without 'contributing to evolution'.
Nature is full of natural sick things. Creatures that kill each other to eat them is one thing. Being intimate with someone of the same sex, when both consent to it, is not any more 'dirty' than a consenting hetrosexual couple.
Is it any wonder that those with mental health problems so rarely look for help!
You don't have to be religious to be sexist or homophobic, but it helps a lot.