The Economist, a respected global economics publication, tweeted on July 1 the announcement of their second Twitter debate entitled 'Should the trading of human organs be allowed?' scheduled for July 6 at 3pm UK time.
Here are the two sides as outlined by The Economist's Facebook event page:
FOR:
-There is a desperate shortage of organs. Around 1,000 people die in Britain alone each year waiting for transplants
- In 1988, Iran changed the law to allow people to sell their kidneys. Within three years, the country no longer had a waiting list for kidney transplants
- Banning the sale of organs drives the trade underground. That makes transplants riskier for both donors and recipients
AGAINST
- The British Medical Association says that allowing organs to be traded would put pressure on poor people to sell
- There are alternatives. Countries in which people's consent to donating their organs is assumed unless they opt out have shorter waiting lists
- Legalising the trade in organs would turn the human body into a commodity. That is taking free markets too far
To tweet your position, follow @theeconomist on July 6 at 3pm UK time. The event is tagged #WDYS.
If you are not current on the organ trade/donor situation worldwide take a look at these articles:
http://delicious.com/wheredoyoustand/organtrading
http://www.emro.who.int/pressreleases/2010/no2.htm
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/what-are-your-organs-worth-1903552.html
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies