House & Home

Rain (AM and PM) 11° London Hi 12°C / Lo 10°C

House prices rise for seventh month

By Nicky Burridge, Press Association

House prices rose for the seventh month in a row during November but there are further signs that the pace of the recovery is beginning to ease, figures showed today.

The cost of a home increased by 0.5 per cent during the month, pushing average property prices up to £162,764 - a level last seen in August 2008, according to Nationwide.

Martin Gahbauer, Nationwide's chief economist, said: "The monthly rate of house price inflation was unchanged in November at a seasonally adjusted 0.5 per cent, leaving the average price of a typical property 2.7 per cent higher than a year earlier."

But there are signs that the recent pace of the recovery may be moderating, with the 0.5 per cent rise recorded for both October and November, the smallest since prices stopped falling in April.

The three month on three month growth rate, which is generally considered to be a smoother indicator of the underlying trend, also moderated during November to 2.8 per cent, down from 3.5 per cent in October and 3.8 per cent in September.

Today's figures come the day after the Bank of England reported that the number of loans approved for house purchase had increased for the 11th consecutive month in October, rising to 57,345, their highest level since March 2008.

The housing market has recovered quicker than expected during 2009 as a shortage of properties on the market has pushed up prices.

However, many economists are predicting a return to price falls during 2010 as more homes are put up for sale.

Nationwide said the housing market remained "crucially dependent" on labour market conditions.

It added that while unemployment had increased noticeably, the rise had not been as rapid or as pronounced as previously feared.

Mr Gahbauer said: "Despite continued uncertainties about the future, the better than expected performance of the labour market has probably contributed to the surprise rebound in house prices this year.

"Together with the fact that mortgage rates have fallen sharply as a result of base rate cuts, this has meant that far fewer borrowers have fallen into arrears than would normally be the case in such a deep recession.

"As such, the downward pressure on house prices from distressed sales has so far been significantly lower than expected."

Howard Archer, chief UK and European economist at IHS Global Insight, said: "While the Nationwide data indicate that house prices are still on an upward track from their February low, the reduced month-on-month increases in both November and October suggests that the rally is beginning to get heavy legged.

"This fuels our suspicion that house prices are likely to suffer a modest relapse in 2010."

Ed Stansfield, property economist at Capital Economics, said: "November brought further evidence that the upswing in the housing market may be running out of steam.

"Although the timing of any switch remains very difficult to call, our central view remains that the recent gains in average house prices will not be sustained and that house prices will drop back, by perhaps 10%, during 2010."

But the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors was more upbeat.

A spokesman said: "A key driver of the rebound in prices has been the lack of new instructions coming on to the market.

"However, there are now a few signs that this is changing, with the latest RICS housing market (survey) showing a little more property being registered with estate agents.

"Nevertheless, the imbalance between buyer interest and the available stock of property is still sufficiently large to point to further price increases into the new year."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

The Return of the Ponzi Scheme
[info]thorntongate wrote:
Tuesday, 1 December 2009 at 09:41 am (UTC)
If you've negative equity, it's good news.

If you're a first time buyer, it's bad news.

If you understand it's been a national Ponzi Scheme since the 1970s, it's a disaster.

Let me offer an example

Year Cost of House Retail price Index Average Earnings
1969 3,050 n/a n/a
1981 26,000 13,093 15,432
1994 70,000 50,095 65,539
2009 212,000 (*) 104,344 122,231

This is the history of our house buying experience, comparing the cost of the house to RPI and Average Earnings using the Measuring Worth calculator.

http://www.measuringworth.com/calculators/ppoweruk/

In terms of physical assets - floor spacem, sq meters - we've moved up the ladder slightly.

In terms of 'wealth' we've outpaced the other measures by ludicrous amounts.

This money will either pay for time in a corporate care home, plus costs of chemical cosh, or it will be a tax free windfall to the nephews.


The damage it has done the economy is incalculable.
[info]starlingnl wrote:
Tuesday, 1 December 2009 at 09:43 am (UTC)
Damn.

Oh well, let's face it, soon we have a small elite that owns houses and a large bunch of poor people renting mouldy hovels from dodgy landlords. It was fun while it lasted, I suppose, but we're sliding rapidly back to Victorian times where housing is concerned.
Return of the Ponzi Scheme
[info]thorntongate wrote:
Tuesday, 1 December 2009 at 10:46 am (UTC)
If you've negative equity, it's good news.

If you're a first time buyer, it's bad news.

If you understand it's been a national Ponzi Scheme since the 1970s, it's a disaster.

Let me offer an example

Year Cost of House Retail price Index Average Earnings
1969 3,050 n/a n/a
1981 26,000 13,093 15,432
1994 70,000 50,095 65,539
2009 212,000 (*) 104,344 122,231

This is the history of our house buying experience, comparing the cost of the house to RPI and Average Earnings using the Measuring Worth
calculator.

http://www.measuringworth.com/calculators/ppoweruk/

In terms of physical assets - floor space, sq meters - we've moved up the ladder slightly.

In terms of 'wealth' we've outpaced the other measures by ludicrous amounts.

This money will either pay for time in a corporate care home, plus costs of chemical cosh, or it will be windfall to the nephews.

The damage it has done the economy is incalculable.
Are house prices really that relevant?
[info]twellian057 wrote:
Tuesday, 1 December 2009 at 10:47 am (UTC)
If the volume of sales is low, due to small supply and demand figures, then the prices are bound to remain stagnant - much the effect we are seeing. There is no real recovery in the housing market and there surely will not be while the price of a house is totally disproportionate to its true worth.
House Prices
[info]manc_saint wrote:
Tuesday, 1 December 2009 at 12:44 pm (UTC)
The article says that "RICS was more upbeat" in reference to their expectation of more price rises. When will people realise that for anyone trying to get on the housing ladder AND ANYONE WISHING TO CLIMB THE LADDER (ie most people) house price rises are a BAD thing! There is always a bias in the media towards rises (aided by the printing of comments from those with a vested interest ie estate agents), wihich causes people to accept continually paying more than something is worth. One day we'll all be living in tiny boxes.