Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

`Is there a tension in the congregation, a little shiver of embarrassme nt? I hope so - because embarrassment is gradually being excluded as a legitimate response to contemporary art'

Promisingly squirm-inducing...

Tom Sutcliffe
Friday 01 September 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

T he first naked woman I saw - the first one that moved anyway - was on stage at The Royal Court. The play was David Storey's Life Class, to which I had been taken for a birthday treat. My parents didn't know, I think, that the evening would deliver this huge and unexpected bonus. I looked on, dazed by my good fortune. My first thought was that this was what people meant when they made remarks about a women being a real redhead; my second was of the dormitory glory this moment would deliver me when I went back to school; my third was of how I could bring my opera glasses to bear without looking like a cartoon dog whose eyeballs had just gone boingg! After five minutes I edged the little red plastic binoculars upwards, sweating casualness. I scrutinised each of the other actors with scrupulous care, doing my best to look like a connoisseur of English acting style. Then finally, after staring at every portion of the stage but that incandescent detail, I edged the field of view towards the burning bush. At that precise moment the actress spoke for the first time in many minutes. I have forgotten her exact words in the scalding flush that followed but it was something like "Getting a good look, are you?", a line delivered in tones of withering contempt.

The embarrassment there was largely accidental - though I suppose that Storey quite relished the little frisson of discomfort that stage nudity will always engender in an audience. But I was reminded of the occasion by going to see Mona Hatoum's much-discussed installation at the Tate Gallery's exhibition "Rites of Passage", which ends today. Corps tranger, for those of you who've been away, consists of a circular structure with two small apertures and a dark interior. Inside, projected onto the floor like the image in a camera obscura, is footage of the inside of the artist's body, taken with an endoscope. You stand in worshipful silence ("my body is a temple") as the camera probes and burrows. The result is a moist, pink speleology, a journey strongly reminiscent of the film Alien, with its exploration of organic, threatening corridors. What, you wonder nervously, is lurking round this dark corner?

This is all fine and dandy (and worth seeing, I would say) but by far the most interesting moments come when the image is on the threshold of telling us where we are, moments when the possibility of embarrassment is raised. It might seem that sticking a camera up your butt is the ne plus ultra of artistic candour (not to say a vindication of some gloomy predictions about the ultimate destination of modern art). But actually Ms Hatoum's innards are so unplaceable and unfamiliar a part of the body that there's no discomfort in looking at them. The anxiety arises when we emerge - when we begin to suspect what that thicket of saplings might be and just where that bolster of damp flesh is located. As the camera grazes Ms Hatoum's nipple - a massy outcrop of pink coral - is there a tension in the tiny congregation, a little shiver of embarrassment at this magnified intimacy?

I hope so - if only because a world without embarrassment would be a worse one and because it can sometimes feel as if embarrassment is gradually being excluded as a legitimate response to contemporary art. It is as though embarrassment is a badge of the naive or the unsophisticated, when quite the opposite is the truth. It is the most social of emotions - it's possible to be embarrassed when you're on your own but only if you imagine yourself in company. The sociologist Erving Goffman wrote: "Embarrassment is not an irrational impulse breaking through socially prescribed behaviour but part of this orderly behaviour itself." And we need more of it in a world so blase.

Ms Hatoum isn't alone in addressing the problem - next week, visitors to the Serpentine Gallery will have the chance to see Tilda Swinton, lying for eight hours at a time in a glass vitrine. This art work, called Maybe, has aroused almost as much scornful copy as Corps tranger, but it sounds promisingly squirm-inducing to me. Watching someone sleep is an unusual privilege, fraught with strange feelings of power and hazard. It is undeniably fascinating but, unless the sleeper is a child, you feel a nervous sense of breaking the rules. What if Swinton were to suddenly open her eyes just as you were staring at her face? What will she do about eye contact with the passing crowd? By sleeping in public she risks the familiar embarrassments of unconsciousness - drool and gape. By watching her we take the risk of catching ourselves as peeping Toms, and so exercising our ability to blush.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in