Andy Heath and his partner Rhona Kirkwood, both 36, are keen to move to a bigger home for their growing family.
At present, the couple live with their two children, Angus, four, and Isabella, two, in a three-bed house in Coventry. He works for international development charity Practical Action as a media officer, while she is a legal adviser with the civil service. They have a combined salary of £60,000, alongside £500 a month in childcare vouchers.
Andy says: "I love my job, as the charity helps provide technology for long-term solutions to the problems the poorest people in the world face, but there isn't much prospect of salary rises for either Rhona or myself in the near future."
The couple bought their home eight years ago for £130,000, and are in the process of applying for a £90,000 repayment mortgage over 12 years fixed at 2.65 per cent for two years with Coventry Building Society.
"Our house is in a nice part of Coventry and currently worth around £160,000," says Andy. "We are remortgaging but it hasn't gone through yet – at present, our repayments are £769 over 17 years, but we want to reduce the length of the mortgage."
A few years ago they paid £30,000 for an extension to add a separate toilet and bigger kitchen. "However, there is no way of adding a fourth bedroom without spending a fortune," he says.
"Although we are happy where we are living, in reality we will need to move in a couple of years' time because we can't extend our house further, and Bella's room is only a box room – when she's old enough, she'll want a much bigger space."
At present, their ideal is to find a four-bed house in the area, but these are priced at around £325,000, so currently out of their range.
However, fortunately, aside from their mortgage the family is debt-free as while they use a credit card they make sure to wipe out the balance each month. But they have little in the way of short-term savings, with just £2,000 in National Savings and Investments' premium bonds.
Turning to pension planning, Rhona pays into the Civil Service Pension Scheme. Andy worked for the police for five years and paid into their scheme, but has yet to sign up to his current employer's offering.
"I know this is a massive error, and I should rectify it," he says. His employer will be paying into his pension scheme too.
They have no protection policies in place.
The couple really need to reassess their financial priorities, stresses Tony Byrne, from independent financial adviser (IFA) Wealth and Tax Management.
He warns: "While they want to upsize their home, this should be lower down on their to-do list, after purchasing adequate insurance cover, and joining the employer's pension scheme – only once these are ticked off should they consider saving towards buying a bigger property."
As Andy and Rhona have a young family it is crucial they are better protected, stress our panel of IFAs.
Mr Byrne said: "They should buy life insurance and, ideally, income protection to cover outgoings in the event of death, a serious illness or disability."
Neil Mayfield, from Mayfield Investment Management, adds: "They should at least have life cover in place to provide enough capital to repay the mortgage in the event of death, plus an income while the children remain dependant."
As a first step they should check what cover is available through their employer. Rhona will have death in service included with her pension scheme, and Andy could benefit from this too if he joins his employer's scheme.
For example, if Andy and Rhona took £90,000 level term assurance over 12 years, this would cost just £6.65 per month each with LV=, according to broker Lifesearch, although ideally they should opt for more than this to cover everyday living costs.
To provide £1,500 per month tax-free income protection cover for Andy, deferred for three months to age 60 in the event of long-term illness or disability, would cost around £32 a month with Exeter Family Friendly.
Given they expect to take on a larger mortgage in the future, the family will need to look to increase life cover at that stage.
Andy and Rhona should review their pension provision to understand what it is likely to provide for them at retirement.
As Andy has pointed out he should definitely join his employer's scheme. He is effectively turning down a pay rise by failing to do so, given his employer will double his contributions.
Warren Shute from Lexington Wealth Management says: "If Andy pays £125 into the scheme his employer will contribute £250 – a total of £375 a month.
"However, this contribution would only cost Andy £85 a month in his take-home pay owing to tax and national insurance savings."
Based on current property values they will have a house to sell worth £160,000 with a mortgage outstanding of around £78,000 after two more years of repayments on a reduced term, says Mr Mayfield, giving total equity of £82,000.
However, Jonathan Harris, a director of mortgage broker Anderson Harris, says reducing the mortgage term might not be the wisest move. "This will push up the monthly mortgage payments when they would be better off saving towards the deposit on the new property. It would make much more sense to opt for a 25-year term rather than reduce their existing mortgage to 12 years," he says.
To help the couple budget effectively they should make a note of their monthly expenditure to see where savings can be made to help build an emergency fund and move towards a future property purchase, agree the advisers.
Ideally, they should aim to increase their instant access savings to at least £8,000. They could keep their premium bonds, but ideally use instant access cash Individual Savings Accounts for short-term savings to benefit from tax-free interest.
Do you need a financial makeover?
Write to Julian Knight at:
The Independent on Sunday, 2 Derry Street, London W8 5HF