Rebels move to stop Moss Bros wedding
Family shareholders step up attack over chairman's acquiescence to Baugur bid. Lauren Mills reports
Sunday 09 March 2008
Moss Bros shareholder David Moss has lambas-ted Keith Hamill, the struggling retailer's chairman, for failing to defend the high-street chain against a £40m takeover offer.
Hamill is due to step down as chairman of Moss Bros – whose brands include Savoy Taylors Guild, Canali and Hugo Boss – in April. He had hoped to leave on a high note, completing the sale to Baugur. But the row over control is becoming increasingly bitter, with Moss, a member of the founding family and a major investor, furious about the way in which Hamill is conducting the sale.
"Hamill's reputation is best served by flogging the business and not being succeeded by a strong, retail-minded chairman who drives the changes that are required," he said on Friday.
But Hamill poured cold water on Moss's attack: "It has nothing to do with my position. This is about doing the right thing for the company and the shareholders."
Moss insists the founding Moss and Gee families want to achieve the best outcome possible. "We are not emotionally attached to this. We are not saying we will never sell. But we think this business is worth more and deserves a board able to stand up and say that."
However, Baugur, the Icelandic retail raider, is determined to press ahead with a formal bid. Members of the founding families, who between them own 26 per cent of Moss Bros, believe the 42p-a-share offer undervalues the business.
"We are talking about a company with £150m of sales, £16m cash in the bank, no debt, no pension liabilities and a collection of well-known brands. It is worth twice what is being offered," said one insider.
In a move to scotch Baugur's plans, Michael Gee, a member of the Cecil Gee clan, whose chain became part of Moss Bros in 1989, is trying to raise funds to buy out its stake. He reckons the Icelandic investment fund would sell two-thirds of its 29 per cent holding in Moss Bros at around 50p a share. Last week he approached HSBC for backing. The outcome of the talks is not yet known.
There is certainly a rising tide of City sentiment that believes Baugur may turn from buyer to seller. "There is a sense they have overstretched themselves," said a City banker.
For the moment Baugur is keeping its cards close to its chest. The acquisitive investor, which already owns swathes of the high street from Woolworths to Oasis to Hamleys, is keen to be seen as a player in the mergers and acquisitions market. With the Icelandic economy causing concern, doubts are growing about the firepower of its banks.
Moody's, the credit agency, recently downgraded its ratings for the country's three largest banks – Kaupthing, Landsbanki and Glitnir – citing concerns about the quality of their assets after years of rapid growth.
While Baugur often teams up with such banks, other City sources believe the com-pany is determined enough to fund a bid out of its own pockets. So even if the families find a way to raise the cash, they reckon Baugur is not a seller at anything close to 50p a share.
"Why would they sell a stake at an effective loss when they may be able to buy the company cheaply, turn it round and make a profit out of it?" asked one retail analyst.
Certainly a deal this size is small fry to Baugur. Yet it is worth doing. The Icelanders plan to increase capital expenditure at the company, edit its brands and improve sourcing. They hope to revive the former glories of Moss bros– such as when shares soared after Prince Charles announced his engagement to Lady Diana Spencer, on the belief that wedding guests would hire their suits from Moss Bros.
Moss believes changes should have been initiated by the current management, regardless of ownership.
"It is an overdone myth that change can only be accomplished in the private arena. Moss Bros needs to buy better product, manage the brands better and take the business more upmarket. The board should get on with it."
Hamill disagrees. "It is generally accepted that strategic changes are easier in a company if it has gone private. It is also generally accepted it is difficult to operate a listed company below a certain size."
- 1 Sofyen Belamouadden murder: The inside story of a crime that horrified Britain
- 2 How to turn off/stop 'seen by' on Facebook: Disable it to make your chats seem less passive aggressive
- 3 Company breaks open Apple Watch to discover what it says is 'planned obsolescence'
- 4 'We're not heroes, just tourists': Swedish police officers on holiday stop vicious assault on New York subway
- 5 Buckingham Palace guard who attacked passers-by in 'most most violent piece of CCTV footage' police officer had seen walks free
The sickening truth about food banks that the Tories don't want you to know
Migrant boat disaster: Ukip candidate mocks victims in sickening Twitter post
Nigel Farage wants the BBC to stop making programmes like Doctor Who, Strictly Come Dancing, and Top Gear
Global warming: Scientists say temperatures could rise by 6C by 2100 and call for action ahead of UN meeting in Paris
General Election 2015: Britain would become a 'communist dictatorship' under Ed Miliband and Nicola Sturgeon, claims wife of Michael Gove
Rupert Murdoch berated Sun journalists for not doing enough to attack Ed Miliband and stop him winning the general election
iJobs Money & Business
£50000 - £55000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Business Analyst - Financial Service...
£18000 - £23000 per annum + OTE £45K: SThree: At SThree, we like to be differe...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + competitive: SThree: Did you know? SThree is the o...
£22000 - £24000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an opportunity to join ...