David Prosser: Pru's shareholders hold it to account
Thursday 03 June 2010
Outlook It is too early to say whether Tidjane Thiam can carry on as chief executive of Prudential in the wake of his misjudgement of the willingness of investors to back the insurer's purchase of AIA. But what has happened at Pru is that this has been a triumph for those who want shareholders to assert themselves more aggressively.
If only, for example, leading investors in Royal Bank of Scotland had been prepared to stick their heads above the parapet in this way, rather than supinely accepting that the bank's management knew best when it got into a bidding war for ABN Amro just as the credit crisis was taking hold.
For too long, the attitude of many large institutional investors has been that it is not their place to make a fuss at the companies in which they hold stakes. At the extreme, investors have reduced their exposure to companies where they disagreed with management decisions. More commonly, they have simply shrugged their shoulders and not bothered voting their shares at the AGM.
That bred a generation of executives who knew their actions would very rarely be scrutinised by those to whom they were in theory accountable. This was one reason why bank bosses were able to expose their companies to the sorts of risks that eventually prompted the credit crisis.
Does the Pru rebellion – and the fact that shareholders' revolts over pay are now so much more common – prove that investors have learned their lesson? Well, to a point. It is to be welcomed that shareholders are now more likely to challenge their executives. But engagement does not have to be so confrontational – there has been rather too much grandstanding during the Pru affair.
This, by the way, is the problem for Mr Thiam. It should be possible for a chief executive to propose a course of action only to change his mind after a reasoned debate with leading shareholders. In Pru's case, the debate became a public fight in which the loser was eventually humiliated. It may be too late to restore relations.
- 1 Nigel Farage: Me vs Russell Brand on Question Time – he's got the chest hair but where are his ideas?
- 2 Harry Potter fans can apply to the Hogwarts-inspired College of Wizardry
- 3 Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
- 4 Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
- 5 Orange Wednesdays are no more
Weather bomb in pictures: Storms cuts power for tens of thousands – and snow is on the way
Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
Russell Brand was rendered speechless on Question Time by this man
Fury at Airbus after it hints the super-jumbo may be mothballed
Disgruntled RBS worker writes hilarious open letter to Russell Brand after anti-capitalist publicity stunt leaves him hungry
Nigel Farage's approval rating hits 'record low' as popularity suffers in wake of Ukip sex scandal
Nigel Farage defends Kerry Smith 'ch***y' comment: 'If you are going for a Chinese, what do you say you’re going for?'
Pakistan school attack live: Taliban kill at least 132 children in 'horrifying' massacre
Sony hack: Angelina Jolie branded 'seriously out of her mind' in further embarrassing leaked email saga
Panic Saturday: 13 million Britons spend £1.2bn – while 13 million others across the country live in poverty unable to afford food
iJobs Money & Business
$200 - $350 per annum: Carlton Senior Appointments: Managing Producer Office...
$125 - $225 per annum: Carlton Senior Appointments: San Fran - Investment Advi...
Up to £70,000 per annum + benefits: Sheridan Maine: Are you a qualified accoun...
Up to £65,000 per annum + benefits: Sheridan Maine: Are you a qualified accoun...