James Moore: Hank Paulson may regret his lenient line on bankers
Outlook Talking of banking, and common sense, has no less a personage than Hank Paulson undergone a damascene conversion and joined the ranks of those questioning the financial world's addiction to bonuses?
Well, up to a point. It's taken a while, five years in fact, but Mr Paulson has expressed some misgivings about the vast sums paid out by banks that enjoyed a similarly vast injection of cash from the American taxpayer. Courtesy of Mr Paulson, who was then the US Treasury Secretary having joined the Bush administration from Goldman Sachs, where he was not unfond of a bonus or three himself.
Mr Paulson's argument, in an interview with the New York Times, is that he needed all banks to sign up to his Troubled Asset Relief Programme and that had he imposed restrictions on pay he wouldn't have been able to achieve this. He's now criticised a "lack of self awareness" from the industry (and its leaders) in the wake of the public blowback stateside.
But, Mr Paulson argues, he was faced with a choice between seeking stability, or pursuing accountability for those responsible for creating the crisis. He chose stability. It's hard to deny that the Tarp programme in the US was highly effective in recapitalising the banking system, and the US economy is in a far better state than, say, Europe's. But Mr Paulson, a banker remember, could certainly have pushed harder for both. In not doing so, his legacy goes beyond a resentful public. It has left an industry which has barely acknowledged any culpability for what went on.
Not only have the guilty gone unpunished, they've actually been rewarded. As such, while the US is reaping benefits economically from Mr Paulson's work, behind the scenes problems are festering.
JPMorgan's London whale, who was allowed to rack up billions of dollars in losses, is one example of what this largely unreconstructed industry is capable of.
Mr Paulson believes the root cause of crises is "flawed government policies". That might be partially true. But the last crisis was just as much about a flawed industry model operated by flawed people, people who ought to have been called to account. The US may yet have cause to regret that. And so may we.
- 1 Kim Jong-un shows off airport designed by architect he likely had executed
- 2 Tunisia hotel attack: Locals form 'human shield' to protect hotel from gunman Seifeddine Rezgui
- 3 German ethics council calls for incest between siblings to be legalised by Government
- 4 Fifty Shades of Grey author E.L James's Twitter Q&A didn't go exactly as planned
- 5 Facebook rainbow profile pictures likely being tracked by social network
The moment a Queen's Guard soldier lost it and drew his gun at annoying tourist
Greece crisis: The wider lesson is that it’s time to abandon this failed experiment in currencies
'I wish the BBC would stop calling it Islamic State' – David Cameron unleashes frustration at broadcaster
Pentagon accuses Russia of 'playing with fire' over nuclear threats towards Nato
They are neither a 'state' nor 'Islamic': Why we shouldn't call them Isis, Isil or IS
Tunisia beach attack: How can British Muslims respond to the latest outrages?
iJobs Money & Business
£40000 - £60000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Compliance Manager is require...
£22500 - £27000 per annum + OTE £45K: SThree: Since our inception in 1986, STh...
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: This extremely successful and well-established...
Competitive with monthly bonus: Guru Careers: We are seeking an experienced FX...