Fund managers `not investing in best performers'
The figures followed a day after an analysis from WM, the Edinburgh- based fund management performance specialist, showing pension funds failing to match the return achieved by the FTSE All Share Index in the first quarter of this year. According to WM, pension funds only managed a 4.6 per cent return on their UK equity holdings in the three months to March, compared with a 5.3 per cent return from the market as a whole.
The two surveys are bound to fuel concerns that expensive fund managers are failing to earn their keep and they could accelerate the trend towards index-tracking funds. These attempt no more than matching an index but at a considerably lower cost than actively managed funds.
Derek Casey, head of Baring Houston's research department, said: "We are trying to put direct property performance into context. These figures add to the current debate about the spread of institutional portfolios, and suggest that property returns are vastly underrated, and that institutions are surprisingly underweight."
According to the research, the balance of institutional portfolios represented by direct property holdings has fallen from 11.3 per cent in 1990 to just 5.2 per cent last year. That has been despite a 9.6 per cent compound growth in the total return (capital gain plus income) from property in the last 10 years.
That performance put property in fourth place behind UK and US equities and UK bonds but ahead of UK cash, European equities, index linked gilts and other overseas equities. Despite their relatively poor showing, overseas equities now account for a larger proportion of institutional portfolios than six years ago and the balance given over to UK bonds has risen sharply from 11.2 per cent to 14.7 per cent.
According to Baring Houston, that leaves institutions particularly badly placed this year, when good growth in GDP is expected to result in a good year for property. In 1987, when GDP was strong, property outperformed all its main competitor classes by a wide margin. Property returns were 26 per cent compared to 8 per cent for UK equities, 15 per cent for gilts and a fall of 9 per cent for overseas shares.
The chances of that sort of performance being repeated this year were highlighted by figures this week from Land Securities, Britain's largest landlord, which showed a 13 per cent rise in net assets as rental growth in good quality buildings took off.
If property enjoys another bumper year, funds will fail to enjoy the benefit thanks to their reduced weightings. They are also much more heavily exposed to equity markets which, after strong runs on both sides of the Atlantic, look vulnerable to a correction, especially if the Chancellor makes widely expected changes to the tax credits that gross funds enjoy on their dividend income.
- 2 Why this father didn’t hide his daughter’s heroin overdose in her obituary
- 3 Company breaks open Apple Watch to discover what it says is 'planned obsolescence'
- 5 The most powerful passports in the world
Nepal earthquake in pictures: Photos show devastation caused by 7.8 magnitude earthquake
Smartphones are making children borderline autistic, says psychiatrist
Nepal earthquake: The race is on to help thousands trapped under rubble around Kathmandu, while remote villages face a long wait for help
Royal baby: Live updates as superbug closes ward at St Mary's Hospital where Duchess of Cambridge is due to give birth
Teaching profession headed for crisis as numbers continue to drop and working lives become 'unbearable'
General Election 2015: Chuka Umunna on the benefits of immigration, humility – and his leader Ed Miliband
The sickening truth about food banks that the Tories don't want you to know
Migrant boat disaster: Ukip candidate mocks victims in sickening Twitter post
Nigel Farage wants the BBC to stop making programmes like Doctor Who, Strictly Come Dancing, and Top Gear
Global warming: Scientists say temperatures could rise by 6C by 2100 and call for action ahead of UN meeting in Paris
Rupert Murdoch berated Sun journalists for not doing enough to attack Ed Miliband and stop him winning the general election
iJobs Money & Business
£24000 - £26000 per annum + benefits : Ashdown Group: A highly successful, glo...
£50000 - £55000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Business Analyst - Financial Service...
£18000 - £23000 per annum + OTE £45K: SThree: At SThree, we like to be differe...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + competitive: SThree: Did you know? SThree is the o...