Business

Partly Sunny with Showers 8° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

CBI demands an overhaul of Britain's energy policy

Business group wants more clean coal and nuclear to end risky reliance on foreign gas

By Sarah Arnott

Business leaders are calling for a major shift in the Government's energy policy to avoid a dirty and dangerous reliance on foreign-sourced gas in two decades' time.

The current approach is both jeopardising the achievement of climate change targets and undermining future energy security, says a Confederation of British Industry report published today, just days before the launch of the Government's Renewable Energy Strategy (RES).

Incentives focused on ramping up wind power will draw investment away from other low-carbon energy sources such as nuclear and clean coal, the report warns. And the need to keep the lights on will force utilities to build extra gas power stations to fill the short-term gap left by the decommissioning, from 201 5, of ageing infrastructure. The result, according to consultants at McKinsey, is that by 2030 the UK energy mix will be unduly reliant on imported gas and not in line with carbon emissions reduction targets.

To be sure of a more balanced mix of energy sources, the Government needs to cut its 2020 renewable target from 32 per cent to 25 per cent, push ahead with plans for nuclear energy and carbon capture and storage (CCS), and accelerate grid upgrades. And there is no time to waste because investment decisions made now will set the energy balance for decades to come.

John Cridland, the deputy director general of the CBI, said: "The RES is the last-chance saloon to get the UK on a sustainable energy path. Our concern is that the current path for investment will leave us with a mix that is not sufficiently de-carbonised and not sufficiently secure."

The alternative suggested by the CBI sees a 2030 energy mix with 83 per cent from green sources – including 34 per cent from nuclear, 20 per cent from wind and 14 per cent from clean coal – compared with only 64 per cent green energy in the "business as usual" scenario, where 20 per cent is nuclear, 24 per cent wind and 8 per cent clean coal. Changing the balance will not cost more than the £150bn investment already predicted. Although it will require more reactors, they can fit on existing nuclear development sites.

The RES, due to be published on Wednesday, will set out how the UK will meet the target to produce 15 per cent of its energy from renewable sources – which equates to more than 30 per cent of electricity – by 2020. It is expected to include strategies for meeting delays in the planning system and upgrades to the National Grid.

So far, short-term progress is not promising. At a local level, most English regions are not likely to meet their interim targets for renewables, the British Wind Energy Association (BWEA) will say today. Just half of the plan envisaging more than 4,500 megawatts of capacity has been installed. And only London, which represents just 2 per cent of the total, is on track for 2010. Alongside the capital, the best-performing regions so far are the East Midlands and the South-east. At the bottom of the league are the North-west, East and South-west.

The BWEA says what is lacking is the political will to succeed. The top priority is to improve the planning system. Despite a target of 16 weeks per application, in reality wind-farm bids take an average of 14 months.

The regional survey's findings highlight a more serious debate around the division of power between central and local government, says the BWEA. Although the targets are set at Westminster, planning decisions rest with Local Planning Authorities. Even the creation of the new Central Infrastructure Authority this year will only take on the biggest projects, when the majority of on-shore wind farms are below the threshold. As long as LPAs are making decisions, influenced by a "not in my back yard" culture, progress towards the targets will be slow, it says.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Corporate pork barrel
[info]old_green wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 08:17 am (UTC)
Hey, doesn't British politics look like US politics? Now, why could that be?
When the lights go out
[info]derekcolman wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 09:25 pm (UTC)
This government has not got a clue about energy policy. Decisions about building new power stations that should have been taken 5 to 10 years ago are still being debated, while we are on a course for the lights to go out. Meanwhile they are listening to a load of greenie idiots who don't care about that, as they have their own agenda. They want to take us back to an imaginary idyll when people went to bed when it got dark and awoke at dawn. Far too much money is being ploughed into the unreliable sources of energy like wind farms and solar panels. No wind farm in the world has ever produced more than a third of its rated output, and solar installations only produce about 15% of their rating. Furthermore, their peak output does not correspond to the times of peak demand. We only have to look at Spain's experience to see the future that is being planned for us, as they have already gone down that road. The result has been companies moving out of Spain to countries where power is cheaper, and large job losses. Before greenies start spouting about green jobs, that did not work either. For every green job created in Spain, 2.2 other jobs have been lost.
We should have had 2 or 3 nuclear power stations already under construction just to replace old plants when they are decommissioned, but because the government has dragged it's heels while dithering over green energy, they will not be ready in time.
This government promised to end fuel poverty by 2016, but it is actually increasing as we already pay a green levy on our gas and electricity bills. That can only get worse as green energy is at least 50 to 60% more expensive. All of that is being done in the name of saving the planet from global warming, which is not actually happening.
I would advise everyone to fill the cupboard under the stairs with blankets, candles and hot water bottles, because you are going to need them in the next 10 years when your lights go out and your boilers go off. If you leave it till the last minute the prices of those items will skyrocket in yet another British rip-off.
Power Privateers
[info]cryptonemesis wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 06:52 am (UTC)
Since creating private monopolies and cosy cartels from the publicly-owned utility industries, successive governments have shown a craven willingness to protect the profits of these pirates preying on the basic public necessities of heat, light and water. They know that directorships, consultancies, party donations and jollies will dry up if any meaningful restriction is placed on this glittering 'free-market' gold rush.

We are now in an energy crisis. Similarly, the government will ask the public to pay for all the crisis-driven innovation that a healthy industry should deliver from its profits, rather than ruffle its golden goose in its feather bed.
Energy Planning
[info]bootlebarth wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 11:22 am (UTC)
Successive Governments have shrunk from making strategic energy decisions for many years. In the mean time the national science/engineering base was allowed to die on the vine.

It will take a major shift such as dropping Tridet and diverting resources to infrastructure to get us out of this mess. However if there is no fat brown envelope for the Freds of this world nothing will happen.

Greed rules today more than ever it has.