Business

Showers (AM and PM) 10° London Hi 15°C / Lo 8°C

Low-carbon energy sources need $10.5trn investment, warns IEA

Global policies key to beat climate change, says IEA

By Sarah Arnott

The world's energy systems will need an extra $10.5 trillion (£6.3trn) in investment between now and 2030 to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and avoid "irreparable damage to the planet", the International Energy Agency (IEA) warned yesterday.

In the run-up to next month's climate summit in Copenhagen, the IEA's annual global outlook outlined parallel forecasts – one based on the current trajectory of global energy consumption, the other a lower-carbon model requiring major international policy co-ordination.

"The outlook provides both a caution and grounds for optimism," said Nobuo Tanaka, executive director of the IEA. "Caution, because a continuation of current trends in energy use puts the world on track for a rise in temperature of up to 6C and poses serious threats to global energy security. Optimism, because there are cost-effective solutions."

Recession has severely dampened demand for energy, but while energy use will fall in this year for the first time since 1981, demand is still set to rise by 1.5 per cent every year until 2030.

Without intervention, fossil fuels will remain the primary energy source and emissions will also rise by 1.5 per cent per year, pushing up global temperatures and leading "almost certainly to massive climatic change and irreparable damage to the planet", the IEA fears. The price of oil will be back up to $100 a barrel by 2020 and $115 by 2030.

Recession has also sent investment in energy plunging. The IEA estimates that upstream oil and gas investment budgets fell by 19 per cent, or more than $90bn, this year. End users are also spending less upgrading to energy-efficient appliances and vehicles.

The danger is that once economies recover and energy demand rebounds, insufficient supplies will be available. "The financial crisis has cast a shadow over whether all energy investment needed to meet growing energy needs can be mobilised," the IEA says.

Some $26trn in investment will be required to meet projected energy demand through to 2030, more than half of it in developing economies.

All is not lost, however. According to the IEA's second scenario, "radical and co-ordinated policy action across all regions" can keep emissions of harmful carbon dioxide into the atmosphere below a safe threshold.

The biggest tranche of savings will come from energy efficiency, particularly in buildings, industry and transport. But demand will still rise by 20 per cent and the extra $10.5trn cost of re-setting the balance towards renewable sources will take the total investment needed to $36.5trn.

The IEA estimates that $197bn per year will be needed by fast-growing, developing countries by 2020 to avoid older, dirty technology – nearly twice the €100bn (£89.7bn) figure put forward by EU leaders last month. The Clean Development Mechanism, under which carbon credits can be earned by investing in poorer countries, will also need to be massively expanded and upgraded to cope with a much more central role, the IEA says.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Cut Heating Bills by 50% and UK CO2 by 4%
[info]redroseandy wrote:
Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 05:25 am (UTC)
From the moment that we switch our radiators on half of the heat given off by them is lost as it goes into the wall behind them. We can, however, get around this problem with an invention from a then schoolboy that got onto the ‘Tommorow’s World’ program decades ago. He had learned from School that heat is given off by way of conduction, convection, and radiation, so when his Grandmother had problems meeting her heating bills the schoolboy reasoned that heat loss due to conduction and convection could be stopped by putting a lining of cardboard covered with silver cooking foil behind his Grandmother’s radiators. Heat loss through the wall is now slashed by nearly 50%, and rooms heat up faster when the heating comes on. The Fire Brigade said at the time that the cardboard was not a fire hazard as behind the radiator is the least damaged part of a room in the event of a fire. And this saving cuts the CO2 emissions of your house.
The UK has 107 main power stations that produce 30% of CO2 production, that is, one power station produces 0.28 % of our CO2 emissions. 26% of our energy is used in space heating so we can guess that the equivalent of 27.82 power stations are used for space heating. If we can cut our space heating needs by nearly half with this simple invention we can reduce the number of power stations that we need by 13.91, and thus cut the total UK CO2 emissions by 3.9%. And we do not need as many new power stations as we did. How about it?
Re: Cut Heating Bills by 50% and UK CO2 by 4%
[info]nightside242 wrote:
Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 12:57 pm (UTC)
Damn, that's some good maths. Will talk to my partner about this when I get home, we have plenty of spare cardboard boxes as we've just moved house. Thanks!
Re: Cut Heating Bills by 50% and UK CO2 by 4%
[info]dunque123 wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 08:03 am (UTC)
perhaps if you put a jumper on over that T-shirt (which frankly looks ridiculous on so many levels) then maybe you wouldn't need to put on the radiator so often :o)
Re: Cut Heating Bills by 50% and UK CO2 by 4%
[info]redroseandy wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 04:33 pm (UTC)
Thanks for the cutting edge critique (which frankly looks ridiculous on so many levels)
Re: Cut Heating Bills by 50% and UK CO2 by 4%
[info]palmersperry wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 10:31 am (UTC)
One slight problem with your reasoning (though I agree that reflective-insulation behind radiators, particularly those on external walls is a good idea). Most radiators are heated by either a gas or oil-fired boiler installed in the property itself, so the improvement you suggest isn't going to result in any power stations becoming surplus to requirements.
Re: Cut Heating Bills by 50% and UK CO2 by 4%
[info]redroseandy wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 04:30 pm (UTC)
It will still have the effect of cutting the CO2 emissions of the equivalent of four power stations even if all the heating is not electric (assuming that household heating is as efficient as power stations).
Re: Cut Heating Bills by 50% and UK CO2 by 4%
[info]mostlymumbling wrote:
Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 04:15 pm (UTC)
That's a brilliant idea! A simple yet effective way of cutting climate change and saving money... I've got some cardboard up in the loft
BEST WAY TO CONtRIBUTE
[info]sawfer wrote:
Friday, 13 November 2009 at 10:47 am (UTC)
the best way to contribute is through some new ideas, such as the idea of Playing poker to save the environment.

The idea was launched by the site pokerice.com, allowing a part of the revenues to be redirected for that particular reason, of fighting the global warming, pollution reducing and other problems...

Read more on http://www.pokerice.com