Business

Partly Sunny with Showers 11° London Hi 13°C / Lo 7°C

Review calls for letting agents shake-up

By Mark Leftly

Property agents in the rental sector must be better regulated, a major housing report launched tomorrow will conclude.

The Carsberg Review of Residential Property is expected to argue that the 1979 Estate Agents Act needs to be updated so that estate and letting agents require an entry-level qualification.

It is also likely to conclude that letting agents should be included in the definition of estate agency and regulated to the same standards. This would ensure that all letting agents become members of a trade body; only about 50 per cent are at present.

The report, led by the former director-general of the Office of Fair Trading Sir Bryan Carsberg, is expected to argue that the existing voluntary arrangements among agents confuse consumers. A summary of respon-ses given to the review panel concluded that customers do not understand the property buying process and that they believe estate and letting agents are licensed.

There will be criticisms that estate agents make up rival offers to interested buyers and inaccurate property descriptions.

Ian Fletcher, director for residential property at the British Property Federation, said: "The current regulatory regime is a patchwork quilt which leaves landlords and tenants confused and unprotected.

"Letting agents collect over £12bn in rent each year, so we need to see money-protection schemes for all agents."

The review was commissioned by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, the Association of Residential Letting Agents and the National Association of Estate Agents.

Sir Bryan published his initial consultation paper in September last year and responses were invited by January this year. More than 100 responses were received.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

ABSOLUTELY TRUE- THEY SHOULD UNDER MORE STRICT REGULATIONS
[info]pearpearl wrote:
Monday, 2 March 2009 at 09:46 pm (UTC)
FOR EXAMPLE:

ST MARTINS PROPERTIES, EAST HAM, E62BD

THEY LET US A FLAT FIRST ALL WHICH WAS COUNCIL FLAT WHICH WE NEVER NEW WAS ILLEGAL TO RENT OUT

SECONDLY THEY NEVER GOT THE REQUIRED MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS AND CLEANING DOEN IN THE FLAT BEFORE WE MOVED IN

FINALLY WHEN WE LEFT THE FLAT WITHOUT A SCTRACH ON THE GLASS AND MUCH MORE TIDY, EQUIPPED, THEY NEVER GAVE US OUR DEPOSIT BACK

MADE US WAIT FOR NEARLT THREE MONTHS AND THEN SAID ACCORDING TO LAW WE DONOT KEEP RECORDS WHICH ARE THREE MONTHS OLD AND TOOK OFF ALL OUR DEPOSIT MONEY AWAY.

PLEASE PLEASE I BEG TO TAKE PROPER ACTIONS AND ISSUE A REALIABLE ACT WHIC PROTECTS THE TENANTS AND LANDLORDS FROM THESE MONEY GREEDY HUNGRY HOUNDS (LETTING AND SALES AGENTS LIKE ST MARTINS PROPERTIES, EAST HAM, E6 2BD)

EDITOR'S CHOICE

Most popular in Business