Business

null 27° London Hi 27°C / Lo 13°C

Shell unveils £1.5m-an-hour profit

By Graeme Evans and Alan Jones, PA
Thursday, 31 January 2008

Royal Dutch Shell reignited anger over excessive profits today after revealing it made $27.6 billion (£13.9 billion) in 2007 - a new record for a UK company.

The figure - equivalent to more than £1.5 million an hour - prompted a fresh call from unions for a windfall tax on oil companies. It also comes at a time when motorists are paying forecourt petrol prices of more than £1 a litre.

Royal Dutch Shell's profits haul for 2007 was 9 per cent higher than a year ago and comes after the price of crude oil rose towards 100 US dollars a barrel.

The Unite union said profits in the industry were "obscene" and urged the Government to take action, especially because of rising energy prices.

Joint general secretary Tony Woodley said: "Shell shareholders are doing very nicely whilst the rest of us, the stakeholders, are paying the price and struggling."

Mr Woodley said that amount of money, added to oil industry profits he put at more than £50 billion in the last three years, was "quite frankly obscene".

He added: "This Government took the brave step of putting a windfall tax on the greedy privatised utilities to fund the New Deal. With pensions injustices still to be addressed, fortune should favour the brave again and the greedy oil companies should be asked to contribute for the common good."

The oil firms, including Shell, argue that they make very little money from forecourt operations, adding that they already pay high levels of tax to the Treasury. In 2005, Chancellor Gordon Brown increased a North Sea tax on energy companies from the 10 per cent he introduced in 2002 to 20 per cent.

Today's figures benefited from a better-than-expected finish to 2007, with fourth quarter profits ahead 11 per cent at $6.68 billion (£3.36 billion). That was higher than consensus forecasts for a figure of around $5.82 billion (£2.95 billion).

The boost came from exploration and production, with the division posting earnings of $4.87 billion (£2.45 billion), against $3.54 billion (£1.78 billion) a year earlier.

This reflected the impact of higher oil and gas prices on revenues, which was partly offset by lower production volumes, higher taxes and rising costs.

Shell has also ratcheted up capital spending to seek out new sources of oil and gas, with chief executive Jeroen van der Veer selling off maturing assets to "rejuvenate" the oil major's portfolio.

He said today: "Overall these are satisfactory results. We made good progress in 2007, launched new projects upstream and downstream, and achieved exploration successes."

AA spokesman Andrew Howard said the responsibility of the oil companies was to produce enough oil to meet world demand.

A windfall tax would just mean more money going to the Government, and less spent on exploration and building new refineries, he said.

"It's a little bit unfair to criticise the oil companies.

"The world market decides oil prices, not the oil companies.

"It's the world market that leads to oil companies making big profits."

Countries such as India and China, which do not produce their own oil, were pushing up the price through increased demand, he said.

"The oil companies need to reinvest this profit back into securing future supplies, and hopefully pushing prices down. They need to explore new oil fields and build more refineries so that there is no shortage in world supply.

"The key measure is whether, when the world oil price comes down again, petrol prices come down as fast as they went up when the oil price went up. That will show whether the oil companies are profiteering."

He added: "What the Government can do is not put 2p on a litre in April. But every time the fuel price goes up the Government makes its own windfall."

Kate Gibbs, spokeswoman for the Road Haulage Association, said: "Everyone that works, works to make a profit, but the profits announced today are above and beyond.

"If the general haulier tells you he is breaking even then he is doing well. A lot of them are operating at a loss because they have to keep passing on the price of fuel. What we would like to see is something taken off the pump price, but we don't live in a perfect world."

She said hauliers could not face another 2p on the price of petrol in April.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

It is absolutely true that you can not blame the oil companies for making obscene profits nor can you blame them because what you can expect from a company is exactly that, the unbounded goal of profit acquisition with little interest in how or from whom they extract this profit. Armed with that knowledge, as most people are finally beginning to be, the responsiblity to act according to put restrictions on these actions using the means granted to us by the mostly representative governments of the States from which these predator oil companies originate. Unfortunately when the leaders of these states are themselves also profitting not only from oil companies but from other exploitative international agencies and corporations, you can then see how far we really haven't progressed in last 500 years, since the power structures remain roughly the same, controlled by the same classes that use the same techniques to stupify the masses.

Posted by Edwin Uribe | 31.01.08, 20:07 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

>>Joint general secretary Tony Woodley said: "Shell shareholders are doing very nicely whilst the rest of us, the stakeholders, are paying the price and struggling.">>

Halfwit. The share price was higher 3 years ago.

Posted by ted | 31.01.08, 18:47 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

What's obscene is the amount of tax we have to pay at the pumps for a litre. Labour, get rid of, quickly.

Posted by Andy | 31.01.08, 17:01 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

If you want more oil from the N Sea, the Shetland and possibly the Irish Sea I'd rather have BP or Shell prospect it than GaZProm and for that you need massive investment. What a tiresome article
- I'm going to switch to the FT.

Posted by KING | 31.01.08, 16:09 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

You might want to investigate what is happening with an onshore gas pipeline in county mayo, Ireland. Shell refused to make it an offshore as it was too expensive (the irony), and is now busy wrecking a site of special scientific interest. There are 24/7 activists on site that have been attacked by hired thugs and even by the Irish police, who also seem to work for Shell. There are videos of the attacks on YouTube. Please look into it, what's happening is disgraceful.

Posted by Marcus | 31.01.08, 14:32 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

In all the frenzy about Shell profits over the past couple of hours there has been no mention of the margin that is being delivered. The key is not the final operating profit, but rather the margin of income which is then turned into profit. This is the true measure of how a company is really doing.

The child-like comments of Unite are both depressing and predictable. Their views are indicative of a country where the most basic details are lost in a froth of indignation. Shell generates wealth for us all. Unite does not.

Posted by Roy | 31.01.08, 10:53 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Perhaps it is not the amount of profits earned, but how they are earned that is newsworthy.

Some argue a windfall tax is appropriate. When you consider Shell's role in climate change and human rights abuses (http://archive.corporatewatch.org/publications/shell.html) a windfall tax strikes me as insulting.

How much money is it worth in the form of a windfall tax to allow Shell to operate in such a fashion?

In other words, what is the value of our moral and ethical obligations to our planet and fellow man?

Posted by Brian | 31.01.08, 09:59 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Funny how the article does not mention that 60 pence of the £1 per litre is tax.....The call for a windfall tax is nonsense....They are worldwide profits not just the UK....Imagine if every government in every country that Shell operated levied a windfall tax.....Pure nonsense from the Unions.

Posted by martin alexander | 31.01.08, 09:35 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Honestly, petrol is so expensive to get out to you little people.
We only make profit on the chocolate and sandwiches, the reason fuel is so expensive at the moment is the Government taxes, the price we are forced to pay OPEC, the transport costs, the Russians, the Gulf states, the er er er er............
So last year our profits were mediocre at best, just thirteen thousand million pounds.
So as you can see things are tight at the moment, but if we all tighten our belts and you keep pouring money into us then we should be fine.

Posted by Geoff Haigh | 31.01.08, 09:19 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Most popular in Business